I see. It has been a while since I have looked at master. Generally,
master is just used for cross-project settings like developer info, etc.
We could move versions down into the parent pom of the main repo and then
just have examples reference the parent. That way versions are controlled
at
Flink announced 1.1.4 release this weekend
slf4j is out with 1.7.22
and other dep jars that might change ...
On the other Apache projects I am on I see some of the jars being updated
with each release, so its expected that the master changes frequently.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Matt
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 4:27 PM Steve Blackmon wrote:
> This could be a breaking change to dependent projects.
>
> For example, if your internal streams repo's parent pom is streams-master
> and streams-master suddenly disappears in the latest release, that’s going
> to take
This could be a breaking change to dependent projects.
For example, if your internal streams repo's parent pom is streams-master
and streams-master suddenly disappears in the latest release, that’s going
to take some refactoring to fix.
Additionally, there’s significant impact to poms, to
Do we wanna target this for 0.4.1 or 0.5 release ?
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 10:00 AM, sblackmon wrote:
> Agreed - reopened STREAMS-255.
> On November 25, 2016 at 2:00:51 PM, Suneel Marthi (smar...@apache.org)
> wrote:
>
> Seems like we have consensus in merging
Agreed - reopened STREAMS-255.
On November 25, 2016 at 2:00:51 PM, Suneel Marthi (smar...@apache.org) wrote:
Seems like we have consensus in merging streams-master and streams-project.
If correct, let's target this for 0.5 release.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Ate Douma
Seems like we have consensus in merging streams-master and streams-project.
If correct, let's target this for 0.5 release.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 2016-11-14 12:22, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:27 AM, sblackmon
On 2016-11-14 12:22, Suneel Marthi wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:27 AM, sblackmon wrote:
On November 11, 2016 at 5:17:11 PM, Matt Franklin (
m.ben.frank...@gmail.com(mailto:m.ben.frank...@gmail.com)) wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:12 PM Suneel Marthi wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:27 AM, sblackmon wrote:
>
> On November 11, 2016 at 5:17:11 PM, Matt Franklin (
> m.ben.frank...@gmail.com(mailto:m.ben.frank...@gmail.com)) wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:12 PM Suneel Marthi wrote:
> >
> > > Why do we have 3 separate
On November 11, 2016 at 5:17:11 PM, Matt Franklin
(m.ben.frank...@gmail.com(mailto:m.ben.frank...@gmail.com)) wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:12 PM Suneel Marthi wrote:
>
> > Why do we have 3 separate projects - Streams-master, Streams-project and
> > streams-examples?
> >
>
The split
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:12 PM Suneel Marthi wrote:
> Why do we have 3 separate projects - Streams-master, Streams-project and
> streams-examples?
>
>
> While it may make sense to keep streams-examples separate from the others,
> what's the reasoning behind keeping
Why do we have 3 separate projects - Streams-master, Streams-project and
streams-examples?
While it may make sense to keep streams-examples separate from the others,
what's the reasoning behind keeping separate streams-master and
streams-project ?
Presently, we need to build, deploy, verify and
12 matches
Mail list logo