In light of the positive feedback and input from Benjamin Young from W3C and
Suneel Marthi which hopefully will lead to a renewal of activity and a move
forwards for Apache Streams, I'm hereby cancelling this vote for retirement.
I'm looking forward to the next steps!
Kind regards, Ate
On 2016-09-19 17:07, Ate Douma wrote:
As was pointed out to me by the John Arment on general@, the process for
retiring a podling is a bit more elaborate, and with different consequences
compared to a TLP retirement (see incubator retierement guide link below).
The most notable difference is that the podling website, in this case
http://streams.apache.org, will be taken down as well.
To make sure everyone has taken note, I'm hereby restarting the vote:
As a final follow up on the earlier [discuss] thread, lets formally vote on
retiring Apache Streams and move it to the attic.
The process is described at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
[ ] +1 Move Streams to the Attic
[ ] ±0 Proceed according to the majority
[ ] -1 Do not move Streams to the Attic, because... [please add justification]
Ate
On 2016-09-18 23:27, Ate Douma wrote:
As a final follow up on the earlier [discuss] thread, lets formally vote on
retiring Apache Streams and move it to the attic.
The process is described at http://attic.apache.org/process.html
[ ] +1 Move Streams to the Attic
[ ] ±0 Proceed according to the majority
[ ] -1 Do not move Streams to the Attic, because... [please add justification]
Ate
