Fwd: First Build via CVS and getting a LogFactory error. NEVER MIND

2004-07-14 Thread Michael McGrady
Never mind, figured it out from the notes in the source file. This is actually a bit of fun. Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:48:34 -0700 To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Michael McGrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: First Build via CVS and getting a LogFactory error. I am trying

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: TitleIndex

2004-07-14 Thread dev
Date: 2004-07-14T21:22:43 Editor: HubertRabago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: TitleIndex URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/TitleIndex no comment Change Log: -- @@ -8,145 +8,3 @@ --

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: TitleIndex

2004-07-14 Thread dev
Date: 2004-07-14T21:17:04 Editor: 210.82.106.156 <> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: TitleIndex URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/TitleIndex no comment Change Log: -- @@ -8,3 +8,145 @@ [[TitleIn

First Build via CVS and getting a LogFactory error.

2004-07-14 Thread Michael McGrady
I am trying to build Struts via CVS in order to get my hands dirty with a bit of assistance in documentation. I am having one difficulty (error) with the build. The error is: [javac] ^ [javac] C:\src\apache\jakarta-struts\src\share\org\apache\struts\act

LabelValueBean and BeanMap with and for indexed properties

2004-07-14 Thread Michael McGrady
I am using my version of a BeanMap built for instrumentation, cf. http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogMappedBeans, and am putting a series of java.util.LinkedLists holding org.apache.struts.util.LabelValueBeans into the BeanMap via setProperty(Object key,Object value). I am then accessi

::: ::: guaranteed behavior?

2004-07-14 Thread Michael McGrady
Hello, all, I am not sure whether this is a dev or a user question, so, I am double posting. If that is wrong, s'cuse, please! I am my version of a BeanMap, cf. http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogMappedBeans, and am putting a series of java.util.LinkedLists holding org.apache.struts.u

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30105] - bean-include.jsp example missing include file

2004-07-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30105] New: - bean-include.jsp example missing include file

2004-07-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide struts-html.xml

2004-07-14 Thread niallp
niallp 2004/07/14 08:13:17 Modified:doc/userGuide struts-html.xml Log: Add "Since Struts 1.2.0" to the action attribute in the RewriteTag docs Revision ChangesPath 1.79 +1 -0 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/struts-html.xml Index: struts-html.xml ===

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30030] - html:rewrite tag doesn't support action parameter

2004-07-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30102] - html:rewrite Tag does not support the action attribute

2004-07-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30102] New: - html:rewrite Tag does not support the action attribute

2004-07-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: HTML taglib: javascript

2004-07-14 Thread Joe Germuska
At 12:24 AM +0200 7/14/04, Wouter Zoons wrote: Hi Joe, Yes the content-type is properly set (after some investigation your concern crossed my mind too), but I don't think this is the problem anyway... The purpose of the CDATA is to have the XML parser ignore any escape characters such as & but unfo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30095] - Clarify rules for direct access of JSPs when using Modules

2004-07-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: getValidationKey()

2004-07-14 Thread Niall Pemberton
No its not used anywhere else at this point. I think this was a mistake when I originally coded the patch but I did have the thought that maybe it could be used in the future with generating the client side validations. Not having to specify the form name on the tag would be good, especially if

getValidationKey()

2004-07-14 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, just looked at DynaValidatorForm & DynaValidatorActionForm saw, DynaValidatorActionForm has no validate() more but getValidationKey() that returns the path... it is the overwritten method from DynaValidatorForm sawing also, that getValidationKey() gets trigered in DynaValidatorForm.validate

message-resources

2004-07-14 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
hi, whats against to set in message-resources the null default-value to "false"? so you got messages like (???net.wessendorf.fooBar???) this is in JSF default, too any comments? Matthias Weßendorf Aechterhoek 18 DE-48282 Emsdetten Germany Email: matthias AT wessendorf DOT net URL: http://www

RE: CVS reorg: jakarta-struts -> struts

2004-07-14 Thread James Holmes
+1 for svn -Original Message- From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 4:57 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: CVS reorg: jakarta-struts -> struts On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:41:32 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: > * Did we end up deciding to stick with CV

RE: CVS reorg: jakarta-struts -> struts

2004-07-14 Thread Ted Husted
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:48:37 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: > That would be excellent, Ted. That would let us all learn SVN as > well as play around with ideas without fear of messing things up > too badly. ;-) > > If I could have found the time, I'd been thinking I wanted to do > something like this

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30095] New: - html:form html response error in multi-module

2004-07-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu