Re: Taglibs and Tiles Extraction Issues

Merry Christmas, btw! Le Dec 25, 2004, à 1:35 AM, Don Brown a écrit : I don't know about the other Struts folks, but I think this is would be a great addition to Tiles. This is not an addition to Tiles, this *is* Tiles. Perhaps I wasn't clear. I have extracted the Tiles code from Struts 1.1, in

Re: Where should the build system live?

Don Brown wrote: perhaps another neutral mock library should be used, jMock. It lets you extend a class, then write tests in it. .V -- RiA-SoA w/JDNC forums - help develop a coomunity My blog -

Re: Where should the build system live?

Martin Cooper wrote: The new build system will consist of a few shared build files, and a per-subproject build.xml file. This leads to the obvious question of where the shared build files should live. There are basically two options, as I see it: 1) In a 'build' subproject. This is the cleaner opti

Re: Taglibs and Tiles Extraction Issues

I don't know about the other Struts folks, but I think this is would be a great addition to Tiles. Initially, the Struts Tiles subproject could host Tiles, but as more adapters get added, and perhaps the Tiles community enlarges, there would be enough interest in hosting the Tiles project some

Re: Taglibs and Tiles Extraction Issues

Martin Cooper wrote: On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 12:22:33 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've made further progress in extracting tiles and taglibs, and have run into several issues I'd like to get some feedback on. 1. Tiles depends on TagUtils in taglibs. Tiles' version of TagUtils has a lin