[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsTraining

2005-03-13 Thread dev
Date: 2005-03-13T23:59:28 Editor: EricSeynaeve Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsTraining URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsTraining no comment Change Log: -- @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@ ''Trainers'':

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33999] New: - [resources] move WriteTag.formatValue() to org.apache.commons.resources

2005-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33672] - struts-faces is incompatible with myfaces

2005-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33511] - 1.2.4 validator.xml problems

2005-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33876] - Javadoc typo (org.apache.struts.action.Action.java)

2005-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r157399 - struts/core/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/src/share/org/apache/struts/action/Action.java

2005-03-13 Thread martinc
Author: martinc Date: Sun Mar 13 22:46:54 2005 New Revision: 157399 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=157399 Log: Bugzilla #33876: Fix typos in Javadocs. Modified: struts/core/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/src/share/org/apache/struts/action/Action.java Modified: struts/core/bran

svn commit: r157398 - struts/core/trunk/src/share/org/apache/struts/action/Action.java

2005-03-13 Thread martinc
Author: martinc Date: Sun Mar 13 22:46:22 2005 New Revision: 157398 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=157398 Log: Bugzilla #33876: Fix typos in Javadocs. Modified: struts/core/trunk/src/share/org/apache/struts/action/Action.java Modified: struts/core/trunk/src/share/org/apache/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33998] - Some @link() tags are still there

2005-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r157397 - in struts/core/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/src: example/org/apache/struts/webapp/example/ examples/org/apache/struts/webapp/validator/ share/org/apache/struts/action/ share/org/apache/struts/actions/

2005-03-13 Thread martinc
Author: martinc Date: Sun Mar 13 22:20:47 2005 New Revision: 157397 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=157397 Log: Bugzilla #33998: Fix incorrect @link syntax. Modified: struts/core/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/src/example/org/apache/struts/webapp/example/LocaleAction.java st

svn commit: r157395 - struts/core/trunk/src/share/org/apache/struts/action/ActionServlet.java struts/core/trunk/src/share/org/apache/struts/action/RequestProcessor.java struts/core/trunk/src/share/org/apache/struts/actions/LocaleAction.java

2005-03-13 Thread martinc
Author: martinc Date: Sun Mar 13 22:00:56 2005 New Revision: 157395 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=157395 Log: Bugzilla #33998: Fix incorrect @link syntax. Modified: struts/core/trunk/src/share/org/apache/struts/action/ActionServlet.java struts/core/trunk/src/share/org/ap

svn commit: r157394 - in struts/apps/trunk: examples/src/java/org/apache/struts/webapp/validator/LocaleAction.java shared/src/java/org/apache/struts/apps/mailreader/actions/LocaleAction.java

2005-03-13 Thread martinc
Author: martinc Date: Sun Mar 13 22:00:29 2005 New Revision: 157394 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=157394 Log: Bugzilla #33998: Fix incorrect @link syntax. Modified: struts/apps/trunk/examples/src/java/org/apache/struts/webapp/validator/LocaleAction.java struts/apps/tru

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33998] New: - Some @link() tags are still there

2005-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Shale] subview component XML composition extension

2005-03-13 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:52:17 -0500, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Geary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think this is all good stuff, but I'd rather see integration with > > Tiles instead of reinventing Tiles. Tiles has already covered some of > > this ground and I see no re

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33996] - ChainAction does not support non-default catalogs

2005-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Shale] usecases app

2005-03-13 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:27:39 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf >public static Object getBean(String name) { Over my development career, about 98% of the time I have implemented static utility methods like this, I have been sorry later. Inevitably, someone wants to specialize the behavior of the (t

Re: [Shale] usecases app

2005-03-13 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 16:11:04 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am just starting to play with Shale framework by > building some simple JSF/Shale web apps. > > The ViewController interfaces is very nice and the its default > implemention (both in *core* framework) a

Re: Compiling STRUTS and STRUTS-FACES with servlet 2.4 and jsp 2.0

2005-03-13 Thread Niall Pemberton
Having the wrapper extend the HttpServletRequestWrapper (introduced in Servlet 2.3) resolves this - just need to remove the "dummy" methods. Niall - Original Message - From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 4:11 AM Subject:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33996] New: - ChainAction does not support non-default catalogs

2005-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Compiling STRUTS and STRUTS-FACES with servlet 2.4 and jsp 2.0

2005-03-13 Thread Craig McClanahan
FYI, as soon as I apply some recent patches (to remove the wrapper class) this whole area will become a non-issue for struts-faces. In the general case, however, it is not currently feasible to create a wrapper that works across 2.3 and 2.4 unless you're willing to do a little work with Java refle

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33995] - ActionServlet.initChain() fails to load additional config files

2005-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33995] New: - ActionServlet.initChain() fails to load additional config files

2005-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33672] - struts-faces is incompatible with myfaces

2005-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Shale] subview component XML composition extension

2005-03-13 Thread gvanmatre
> Ah, okay, I see. This capability, which essentially lets you plug > component attributes (including managed bean properties) into > components at runtime, is more fine-grained than Tiles and is certainly > JSF-specific. In fact, a while back, I had a client ask for something > like this: they

Re: [Shale] subview component XML composition extension

2005-03-13 Thread David Geary
Ah, okay, I see. This capability, which essentially lets you plug component attributes (including managed bean properties) into components at runtime, is more fine-grained than Tiles and is certainly JSF-specific. In fact, a while back, I had a client ask for something like this: they wanted to

Re: [Shale] subview component XML composition extension

2005-03-13 Thread gvanmatre
> David Geary Wrote: > Perhaps, but assuming we want the same functionality that Tiles > currently provides, such as XML tile definitions, tile inheritance, > role-based tiles, controllers, etc., you're going to have to reinvent > it unless you leverage Tiles somehow. You can have layout compone

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33989] - ant test.tomcat.40 fails: taskdef class org.apache.cactus.ant.RunServerTestsTask cannot be found, task name runservertests

2005-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Shale] subview component XML composition extension

2005-03-13 Thread David Geary
Le Mar 12, 2005, à 3:52 PM, Mike Kienenberger a écrit : David Geary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think this is all good stuff, but I'd rather see integration with Tiles instead of reinventing Tiles. Tiles has already covered some of this ground and I see no reason for us to follow. I haven't used J

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33989] - ant test.tomcat.40 fails: taskdef class org.apache.cactus.ant.RunServerTestsTask cannot be found, task name runservertests

2005-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33982] - taglibs build failure

2005-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33991] New: - test date formatting for the bean:write tag

2005-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Shale] subview component XML composition extension

2005-03-13 Thread gvanmatre
> Mike Kienenberger wrote: > I haven't used JSF enough to see if it fits the same pattern, but the > component-based frameworks I've used in the past have always made Tiles > unnecessary. Components are "tiles". I think that many might prefer using a component XML base technique for page com

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33989] New: - ant test.tomcat.40 fails: taskdef class org.apache.cactus.ant.RunServerTestsTask cannot be found, task name runservertests

2005-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu