On 9/6/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The action is (intended to be) the class that handles the entire
request, whether that involves parcelling out the work to other classes or
not. An action was designed to be the end point of the request, not one of a
set that handles the request
Martin Cooper wrote:
This is the part that I've never understood. If it's intended to be a
helper
class, then why, oh why, do you insist on using an Action for this? If it's
a helper class, *make* it a helper class, not an action! And if the reason
is that you also use it as an action, then my r
Could someone please add permissions to my user account as well?
Username is 'rainerh'.
tia,
Rainer
On Aug 30, 2006, at 23:36 , Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 8/28/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/28/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 'signup' says no more users can be added.
On 9/5/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Paul et al,
Paul Benedict wrote:
> Everyone, thank you for the response.
>
> Martin Cooper wrote:
>> This sounds to me like a rather blatant mis-use of actions. In the
first
>> place, as Michael points out, action chaining has always be
Paul Benedict wrote:
All good points. But do end points have to be singular?
Well, I suppose I could have been being too semantic... an endpoint
means a point at which something, typically a line, ends. A point,
AFAIK, is always singular.
Like I said, it's possible I was being too literal
All good points. But do end points have to be singular? I do not believe
I have invented any sort of unique design. I have employed actions in
actually a very similar fashion to how a portlet server would work.
Additionally, I don't know exactly which project in Apache has done
this, but I know
Hi Paul et al,
Paul Benedict wrote:
Everyone, thank you for the response.
Martin Cooper wrote:
This sounds to me like a rather blatant mis-use of actions. In the first
place, as Michael points out, action chaining has always been an
anti-pattern in Struts.
As Michael later pointed out (and
Everyone, thank you for the response.
Martin Cooper wrote:
This sounds to me like a rather blatant mis-use of actions. In the first
place, as Michael points out, action chaining has always been an
anti-pattern in Struts.
As Michael later pointed out (and I should have explicitly said), this
I should have kept my mouth shut ;-) Paul's suggestion is *not* about
chaining (while it *may* indirectly promote it).
As I understand it, Paul builds a page out of smaller blocks, each
block is rendered by an action. I do the same thing and I do not
oppose Paul in this regard. You are saying tha
On 9/6/06, Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've needed this, too. You should be able to implement it with an
interceptor. Apply the interceptor globally to all your actions. ...
Clearly, we need those [s1] and [s2] subject line tags. :)
Paul's proposal is for Struts 1.
--
Wendy
-
I've needed this, too. You should be able to implement it with an
interceptor. Apply the interceptor globally to all your actions. If
the current action has a "private" parameter, the interceptor can
verify that it's being entered a second time (i.e., the first time was
through a public action whi
I'm not sure it's a common enough need to justify being built into the
core. For something like this, I'd be content with an app-specific
extension and using to mark private actions.
On 9/6/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For a lack of a better subject line. Let me explain.
I hav
On 9/6/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This sounds to me like a rather blatant mis-use of actions. In the first
place, as Michael points out, action chaining has always been an
anti-pattern in Struts. As such, I'd be against promoting / encouraging the
use of chaining in the way you
This sounds to me like a rather blatant mis-use of actions. In the first
place, as Michael points out, action chaining has always been an
anti-pattern in Struts. As such, I'd be against promoting / encouraging the
use of chaining in the way you describe (or in any other way, for that
matter ;).
M
I don't care much about this... I would say -0.
I see that you use includes primarily for composition. I use included
actions also as request targets, I need them to be accessed from
browser, i.e. public, so your suggestion is of no use for me.
If you need this feature then who am I to oppose :-
For a lack of a better subject line. Let me explain.
I have some actions which are not supposed to be accessed by users. They
are mostly for internal uses within the program. Specifically, I like to
include many actions on a page and build a poor-man's portlet. So what I
have, architecturally
On 9/6/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It didn't show my changes. I'm not sure if it's showing anything from
the POM under apps.
If I move the changes down to the blank POM, it works just fine.
I pasted the copy-sources config into struts-apps-parent, and then
from struts2/apps/blan
On 9/6/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Try this from the webapp that is not including the source code: mvn
help:effective-pom
Does that show your changes?
Right now I'm not sure if the config you added is present and not
working, or if it's not even getting picked up.
It didn't sh
Ahh... ok, noted. Changed the email address to direct to struts-dev malling
list (in svn head).
rgds
- Original Message
From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 5 September, 2006 9:37:09 AM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r439914 -
/struts/maven/trunk/stru
On 9/6/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/6/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/6/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I tried to update the S2 apps POM to bundle the source, as we do with
> > the S1 apps, but it didn't seem to work.
> ...
> > Is there somethi
On 9/6/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/6/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried to update the S2 apps POM to bundle the source, as we do with
> the S1 apps, but it didn't seem to work.
...
> Is there something else we need to do?
After you made the change to struts2
On 9/6/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know it's a little early for this, but I just purchased my
conference pass and plane ticket today (early discount ends soon). I
arrive Sunday evening around 8 pm.
I'm going to try to stay with Don Brown if they give him a room with
2 beds,
I know it's a little early for this, but I just purchased my
conference pass and plane ticket today (early discount ends soon). I
arrive Sunday evening around 8 pm.
I'm going to try to stay with Don Brown if they give him a room with
2 beds, however, in case that doesn't work out, please k
On 9/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have to validate Combo Box ...
Please ask this type of question on the user list.
You can find subscription information on this page:
http://struts.apache.org/mail.html
--
Wendy
---
On 9/6/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tried to update the S2 apps POM to bundle the source, as we do with
the S1 apps, but it didn't seem to work.
...
Is there something else we need to do?
After you made the change to struts2-apps-parent, did you 'mvn
install' it so the updated
For Struts Next, here are my personal goals.
* xStruts.
I would like Struts to become a framework so elegant that developers
working in other environments will want to implement it too. IOW, the
xUnit of web development frameworks.
Overarching vision: "Share the wealth."
* Struts DAO.
Today,
I tried to update the S2 apps POM to bundle the source, as we do with
the S1 apps, but it didn't seem to work.
...
maven-antrun-plugin
copy-sources
process-sources
Hi,
I have to validate Combo Box such that it should have only
Numeric Values by default it will hold value "NONE" ,so I put the mask
for the filed as given below
mask
28 matches
Mail list logo
