Done. The Ant build was deploying xwork 2.0-rc1-snapshot.
Don
Wendy Smoak wrote:
Struts 2 won't build against the XWork snapshot that is available in
the repository:
[INFO] Surefire report directory:
e:\svn\struts\current\struts2\core\target\sure
fire-reports
org.apache.maven.surefire.boote
I agree with both of you :) On one hand, I hate to maintain code in
Struts that doesn't provide any real added value and saps already
precious resources and time. On the other hand, I want to make Struts
immediately useful and having a powerful tag library is key.
I'm wondering if having aja
Very interesting... I wonder how much of the performance hit was due to
Freemarker and how much OGNL. Could you package this application in a
war and attach it to a JIRA ticket? I'd love to have it for future
comparisons.
Don
dice wrote:
They are my stats Ted. The stats are posted below al
On 12/13/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it's related to the new people.apache.org community website.
Someone changed the ownership of /www/people.apache.org/builds to
'apsite'. (I think it used to be apcvs.)
I just asked on irc, and they changed the group ownership back to
They are my stats Ted. The stats are posted below along with my sample JSP
code. I only tried the textfield tag but looking at the ftl and vm files for
the other tags I can't see how the results would be any different.
Perhaps an interim solution could be to remove the use of OGNL from core
func
Can someone please unsubscribe me from the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
emails. I've tried to:
1) Use the link at the bottom of the email to unsubscribe, but
confluence has no record of this e-mail when I try to retrieve my
username so I can't seem to unsbuscribe from there.
2) I tried to use the administr
On 12/12/06 4:31 PM, "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A plugin for enhanced tags, like treeview, seems reasonable, leaving
> the core tags to concentrate on cases with direct HTML 4 corrollaries,
> but that's something we could sort out for the next GA series.
I like this, using plugins.
On 12/13/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All of a sudden, about 2 days ago, my cron job cannot remove old
nightlies due to permissions. Did someone change something?
I think it's related to the new people.apache.org community website.
Someone changed the ownership of /www/people
All of a sudden, about 2 days ago, my cron job cannot remove old
nightlies due to permissions. Did someone change something?
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
Begin forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon)
Date: December 13, 2006 2:00:01 AM EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
One of the issues that I ran into while implementing solutions in Webwork is
how to handle bean array validation. The issue is that you can't validation
an array of business objects declaratively using the build-in xwork
validation xml. Has this been addressed yet or is this still something that
Yes, it does certainly "feel" easier to just go straight to bytecode. (well,
not exactly...I mean you're still basically just passing a String with java
code in it to javassist) At least it wouldn't involve as much hashing lookup
kind of operations to complete.
I'd still be open to doing whateve
I wouldn't jump straight to a bytecode solution, there's no reason it should
be that much faster than a well-designed plain Java solution.
Bob
On 12/13/06, Jessek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Last time I'll interrupt your normal dev cycle I promise.
Since it seems we are both equally screwed i
Last time I'll interrupt your normal dev cycle I promise.
Since it seems we are both equally screwed in the short term by any non ognl
solution it might be beneficial to consider just fixing it. I'm very
familiar with javassist bytecode manipulation and vaguely familiar with the
internal working
I wouldn't agree to have tags for every Dojo widget, which would be
insane, but keeping these few tags, can make life a lot easier for users
who only want to add some "ajax-behavior" here and there in their
applications.
musachy
Ian Roughley wrote:
This has been my concern for some time now..
I've got a tiles-core-2.0-SNAPSHOT.jar (128,880 bytes) from 9/14/2006
that is working fine with my project under JDK 1.4.2. How can I get the
source code for this date? If not that, then the latest source code
known to work with JDK 1.4?
Sam
-Original Message-
From: Dave Newton [mailto:
You may want to take a peek at the svn source tree in t5. It has a slightly
better version of these semantics. (though I doubt you'll find any advanced
sort of expr support like ognl might provde)
That being said, 1ms or so is all it takes to render a lot of tapestry
pages, so I wouldn't discount
From: Ian Roughley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This has been my concern for some time now... especially with the dojo
> / ajax tags. What we seem to be doing is simply wrapping the dojo tag
> with a s2 tag - providing ways to access the dojo specific attributes.
> [...]
> Perhaps this is best left
From: David H. DeWolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David H.
> Stone, Sam wrote:
> > Before I go through the trouble of building this and portlet and
> > wahtever else I might need - will it all compile with JDK 1.4? I've
> > been
> > using an older snapshot jar with WebSphere 5 (JDK 1.4.2
On 12/13/06, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you have the performance numbers that you can share? I'd really be
interested in them.
There are some interesting numbers here
*
http://javajmc.blogspot.com/2006/10/webwork-and-stripes-simple-performance.html
(be sure to read to the *e
And not to mention that debugging for new users is not a trivial task!
/Ian
Don Brown wrote:
The question is do we want to create one Struts tag library that does
everything, or focus on tags that require close ties with our
framework? While I like the idea of providing more features and ta
This has been my concern for some time now... especially with the dojo /
ajax tags. What we seem to be doing is simply wrapping the dojo tag
with a s2 tag - providing ways to access the dojo specific attributes.
There are then additional issues - such as the dojo code releasing more
often the
Do you have the performance numbers that you can share? I'd really be
interested in them.
Also, since you've considering JSF and performance is the deciding
faactor, do you have the performance information between s1, s2 and JSF?
/Ian
dice wrote:
The custom OGNLValueStack made little dif
Add spell checker capabilities to your Windows projects! With EffectiveSoft
Spellchecker SDK this is easy. The development library contains a common DLL
interface and interfaces for C++ and .NET with corresponding documentation and
examples (C++, C#, Delphi). It may be linked to any Windows pro
23 matches
Mail list logo
