>Are you absolutely sure that all i18n reloading is off? There are a
couple of ways to enable it, not just one.
Yes, I'm sure because changing the entry in the property file doesn't
change the label printed.
Also, not all take the same time.
Some take 1ms, most 50~100 and a few take up to 3
Brian Pontarelli wrote:
>
>
> Hey all. I wanted to drop the developers a few notes regarding my recent
> experience with Struts2. I've been a Struts/WebWork user for quite some
> time and recently attempted a stab at the Struts 2 switch because I'm
> planning on using Struts 2 for building
Hi All,
I have 2 Radio Button Group
How can i call the following html:radio code in javascript
html:radio code
First Radio Button Group
Second Radio Button Group
Here, the value type is Integer as it having more than one value. My
About the documentation I'd like to point out that I had a similar
experience. The wiki is great for users that already know the framework and
are looking for a reference, or specific information, but for new users it
is quite hard, I always found the "User Guide" on S1 quite useful. The good
thin
Looks like it could be an issue with the xwork2 2.0-beta1 JAR file from
the 2.0.1 beta bundle conflicting with the nightly because there doesn't
seem to be an xwork JAR in with the nightlys. Again, this is pretty
cumbersome to get working because of the numerous JAR files floating
around and
Brian Pontarelli pontarelli.com> writes:
> 3. The documentation for Struts 2 contains references to zero
> configuration and the web.xml configuration file also contains this
> stuff. There are also a number of references to all the annotations.
> These are not available in the 2.0.1BETA JAR f
Hey all. I wanted to drop the developers a few notes regarding my recent
experience with Struts2. I've been a Struts/WebWork user for quite some
time and recently attempted a stab at the Struts 2 switch because I'm
planning on using Struts 2 for building client sites for the company I
work fo
I'd like to do this for the 1.x line as well. I want to push out a new
1.3.7 with a few tiny patches to fix the defunct 1.3.6, and then push in
more radical features.
Do I need a vote? Wait 72 hours? Do it alone? Just asking on the procedure.
Paul
Ted Husted wrote:
We almost branched before,
Mike Baroukh wrote:
I made some tests and yes, it's very slow : on my PIV, 3Ghz, each
call to getText() take approximatively 200ms.
These are similar to the initial numbers that I saw, however, after
tweaking my configuration, my getText() invocations are much faster than
that - consi
Hi.
I need some advice about performance on an application I'm actually writing.
Some days ago I saw a lot of message speaking about performance.
I understood there is problems with :
- freemarker :
by adding a freemarker.properties file in classpath with something like
template_update_del
On 2/7/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/7/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, it implies no such thing. A binding +1 for GA is a statement that
you
> believe that the code is of a quality commensurate with a release to a
> general audience. It is not an implication o
On 2/7/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, it implies no such thing. A binding +1 for GA is a statement that you
believe that the code is of a quality commensurate with a release to a
general audience. It is not an implication of personal support or anything
else. Further, a determin
Hi All:
Does anybody knows what the following code in validation.xml means?
extendstravelerRows
Yours,
Curious
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/What-does-%22extends%22-means-tf3189505.html#a8853883
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list ar
On 2/5/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Struts 2.0.5 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-205.html
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.5/
Maven 2 staging repository:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/
On 2/7/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Phillip filed a number of tickets regarding WebWork fixes, so what we
haven't applied may just be pending. I know there are a couple of WW
patches slated for 2.0.6 (thanks Tom!).
And as soon as my apache account is created, I'll be committing t
Phillip filed a number of tickets regarding WebWork fixes, so what we
haven't applied may just be pending. I know there are a couple of WW
patches slated for 2.0.6 (thanks Tom!).
Overall, there are a number of patches that should be reviewed and
either applied or otherwise resolved.
*
https://i
I would argue also that a lot of fixes going into struts 2.0.x haven't made
it back into webwork. Several issues I resolved in Webwork this weekend
were already fixed in Struts 2.0.x.
Tom
On 2/7/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm fine with branching now, but it means that we need to
I'm fine with branching now, but it means that we need to be extra
careful to port fixes to all applicable branches: WebWork 2.2.x (where
applicable), Struts 2.0.x, and Struts 2.1.x. A lot of fixes have been
going into WebWork 2.2.x that haven't been making it to Struts 2.0.x,
so we need to be do
There are a few ajax issues with their patches already on jira. They are
all simple fixes and could be addressed on 2.0.6 instead of 2.1.
regards
musachy
Ted Husted wrote:
OK, I created a 2.0.x branch and I'm about to update the POMs. This
stuff is trivial to do, so if anyone is deadset agains
OK, I created a 2.0.x branch and I'm about to update the POMs. This
stuff is trivial to do, so if anyone is deadset against a branch now,
we can redo it easy enough later. Though, I'd be happy to ensure that
we backport relevant 2.1.x changes to 2.0.x, until we hit a 2.1.x GA.
I've silently bulk
On 2/5/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[x] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
We've had a lot of comments on the prior test builds, and so I do have
confidence in the bits. But, I'd still like to have a brief ten-day
beta period, to encourage wider
Ted Husted wrote:
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ X ] General Availability (GA)
+1 GA
Deployed and tested into our qa environment without any glitches.
Moving to production soon without any reservations.
Rene Gielen wrote:
Craig,
So feature freeze and branch 2.0.x now, only fix reported bugs from beta
tests and roll out the result as GA, while trunk moves on to 2.1.x,
fully open for new features and whatever? IMO this would be the perfect
way to go, you get a big +1 from me on this :)
+1 As
On 2/7/07, Philip Luppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/7/07, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig,
>
> So feature freeze and branch 2.0.x now, only fix reported bugs from beta
> tests and roll out the result as GA, while trunk moves on to 2.1.x,
> fully open for new features and what
On 2/7/07, mraible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm with Don here - IMO, Struts 2.0.1 was been usable for the general public
True. And if we had a stable release of XWork 2 in September, I
believe that we would have marked 2.0.1 GA.
and the subsequent releases are all a result of Apache politic
We almost branched before, so let's go ahead and do it now.
My only request would be that we tkeep the new feature set for 2.1.x
manageable, so that we can move to another GA release of that series
soon. As triggers, I would suggest:
* Refactoring of Dojo and Portlet support to plugins
* Extract
On 2/7/07, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Craig,
So feature freeze and branch 2.0.x now, only fix reported bugs from beta
tests and roll out the result as GA, while trunk moves on to 2.1.x,
fully open for new features and whatever? IMO this would be the perfect
way to go, you get a big +
I was hoping after 2.0.4 that the ognl race condition issue would have
been resolved. Jesse is ready to push the release out probably this
evening, but give it a couple of days. For me, 2.0.5 came a bit too
soon after 2.0.4. But overal, I think the framework itself is ready
for GA.
[ ] Leave at
28 matches
Mail list logo
