Re: PROPOSAL: s1 modules module

2007-04-23 Thread Paul Benedict
On 4/22/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/22/07, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If all integrations were projects on themselves, this would not happen. This is due probably to the fact that Struts 2 did not use the Maven release plugin, and I think that we need to use

Re: PROPOSAL: s1 modules module

2007-04-23 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2007/4/22, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 4/22/07, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If all integrations were projects on themselves, this would not happen. This is due probably to the fact that Struts 2 did not use the Maven release plugin, and I think that we need to use it since

Re: PROPOSAL: s1 modules module

2007-04-23 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2007/4/23, Paul Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I totally agree, even to this day, that breaking out Struts 1 modules into independent releases is a bad idea. Why? Because it's essentially the framework spread across separate jars, and those truly have tight cohesion. Isn't it a problem of

Re: PROPOSAL: s1 modules module

2007-04-23 Thread Ted Husted
On 4/23/07, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Probably because making releases is (or better was) a painful operation. What if with 2 mere commands you created a release? The Struts 2 process is documented here: *

Re: PROPOSAL: s1 modules module

2007-04-23 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2007/4/23, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 4/23/07, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Probably because making releases is (or better was) a painful operation. What if with 2 mere commands you created a release? The Struts 2 process is documented here: *

Re: PROPOSAL: S2 ajax validation

2007-04-23 Thread Ian Roughley
Is the Ajax code all in a module now (2.1.x)? Would this change be checked into the 2.0.x branch or just the trunk under the Ajax module, and then some cleanup/removal of existing code in the trunk? /Ian Musachy Barroso wrote: I have this working, but I want to give it a little more time to

Re: PROPOSAL: S2 ajax validation

2007-04-23 Thread Musachy Barroso
This would be for 2.1, and it would be in Bind.js. It is actually only one function, which will be calling the functions in validation.js(addError/clearErrors...). I'm planning to do some cleanup after that as we have some javascript/css files hanging around, which are not used. musachy On

Re: ApacheCon

2007-04-23 Thread Mark Menard
On 4/23/07 10:08 AM, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone considering submitting a speaking proposal on s2 for ApacheCon this year? I have submitted three, one on Struts 2 interceptors, the other two on Struts 2 w/ Groovy, one a one hour intro, the other a half day training session.

ApacheCon

2007-04-23 Thread Ian Roughley
Is anyone considering submitting a speaking proposal on s2 for ApacheCon this year? /Ian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: PROPOSAL: S2 ajax validation

2007-04-23 Thread Musachy Barroso
Thanks for the code. Mine is very similar with some JSON encoding added. The resulting JSON is a little bit different: /* { errors: [ Error0, Error1 ], fieldErrors: { field1 : [Error0, Error1], field2: [Error0, Error1], } } */ musachy On 4/23/07, Brian Pontarelli

Re: PROPOSAL: S2 ajax validation

2007-04-23 Thread Musachy Barroso
By the way, should we ever bring the JSON plugin in? musachy On 4/23/07, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the code. Mine is very similar with some JSON encoding added. The resulting JSON is a little bit different: /* { errors: [ Error0, Error1 ],

Re: PROPOSAL: S2 ajax validation

2007-04-23 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Excellent. Well, then really all that is lacking is a generic JS script to handle the response and add errors to the form/labels/some div. It would be excellent to have a JS plugin model where developers can select the JS framework they want to use and then they can plugin to the Struts

Re: PROPOSAL: S2 ajax validation

2007-04-23 Thread Musachy Barroso
That would be the function I mentioned before. With that in mind, I think it would be better to have the interceptor and the generic function in core, so it can be used with other js libraries. I was going to put it in the Dojo plugin as we are moving all the ajax stuff there, but it isn't

Re: ApacheCon

2007-04-23 Thread Dave Newton
--- Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone considering submitting a speaking proposal on s2 for ApacheCon this year? I was going to, but I couldn't think of a good topic, and Mark already took the only one I had thought of :) I'm open to suggestions, though. Dave

Re: ApacheCon

2007-04-23 Thread Mark Menard
On 4/23/07 1:03 PM, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone considering submitting a speaking proposal on s2 for ApacheCon this year? I was going to, but I couldn't think of a good topic, and Mark already took the only one I had thought of

Re: ApacheCon

2007-04-23 Thread Ian Roughley
I would be up for a collaboration, if there are others that are interested. /Ian Mark Menard wrote: On 4/23/07 1:03 PM, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone considering submitting a speaking proposal on s2 for ApacheCon this year?

Re: ApacheCon

2007-04-23 Thread Dave Newton
--- Mark Menard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/23/07 1:03 PM, Dave Newton wrote: Hey, is that a back handed compliment? ;) Sorta :) Part of the problem is that I find most of S2 fairly intuitive (a very good thing) but that makes it harder to know what people might want to know. You know?

Re: [S2] Validation aliases seem broken

2007-04-23 Thread Dave Newton
Oops, sorry; meant to not send this. --- Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Brian Pontarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And finally, I have a single validation file named: NewsPersist-validation.xml What I figured would work was an XML file named: