As it turns out, I won't be attending ApacheCon myself this year. My
project is getting a very late start, and we'll need to make up for
lost time. (I'll be very heads-down in November and December). Also,
my training session was closed for insufficient attendance, so I'm
just going to stay here an
For those not following the ticket, I've written unit tests that
verify this is not an issue. Private variables and protected accessor
methods are not accessed by the ParametersInterceptor, which is the
piece that translates request parameters to method calls.
As always, this is a good time to re
Hello.
I posted this issue to JIRA.
Thank you for your advice, Phil and Jim.
I atached a sample.
A action named SessionUser has no public getSession(), but this
problem is caused.
I think that it is necessary to fix this.
>>> it seems that Hisato Killing
>>> (or Tatekura Hisato, who knows? :-
On 10/18/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/10/18, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > 0 (b) Edit the site/xdocs/index.xml file to change the "Download Now"
> > label to the pending version, and to change the "Getting Started" link
> > to also point to the pending version.
>
2007/10/18, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> 0 (b) Edit the site/xdocs/index.xml file to change the "Download Now"
> label to the pending version, and to change the "Getting Started" link
> to also point to the pending version.
>
> 2 (b) Edit the site/xdocs/index.xml file to change the "Downloa
Just to follow up on the build issues, I broke out the items regarding
updating the S2 home page.
0 (b) Edit the site/xdocs/index.xml file to change the "Download Now"
label to the pending version, and to change the "Getting Started" link
to also point to the pending version.
2 (b) Edit the si
On 10/17/07, Brian Pontarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks good. I like the name and most of the concepts. Here's some
> additional thoughts:
>
> 1. If no code component exists and a default is not available, the code
> invocation can be completely by-passed and processing should proceed
> wi
On 10/17/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm..I'm a bit leary about this "component" talk. I'd like to keep
> Struts 2 simple and I see the goal of this is to define a plugin that:
> * Builds configuration based on annotations
> * Defines default results when none specified
In the spec
Hi all!
To all developers that may not have noticed it, it seems that Hisato Killing
(or Tatekura Hisato, who knows? :-) ) found a possible security bug:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2264
I think that we should move on fixing (if necessary) this bug, and, after
that, prepare a fast-tr
