Since the beginning of time, the i18n tag has contained the following
OGNL expression to lookup a resource bundle:
ResourceBundle bundle = (ResourceBundle) findValue("texts('" + name + "')");
and TextProvider has provided the method:
ResourceBundle getTexts(String bundleName);
That OGNL expre
Adam Peller wrote:
>
>
> Dojo 1.0 is all about performance and stability, and the follow-on Dojo
> 1.x releases continue in that direction with no radical changes to the
> core or Dijit architecture. Dojo base is now very tiny (<25K, on par with
> other toolkits) and the performance of the ne
I'm glad I am not the only what thinking this. I think dojo should be thrown
out completely. Its a ridiculous that my normal 30KB web page request jumps
to 500KB+ request as soon as I use the shead - ajax tag.
I find jquery much smaller and easier to work with.
Matt
Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
It doesn't help your argument to use Maven as an example :) I think
it is pretty straight forward - all plugins have versions, only the
bundled plugins are versioned/released along with the rest of Struts
to make it simpler. If we gave each plugin its own version, which we
did with Struts 1, it g
2008/2/23, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So what happens if a plug-in is added to the core (e.g. a YUI and/or GWT
> plugin to compliment the dojo one), does that necessitate a 2.2?
This is The Good Question :-)
As I wrote a lot of time before, IMHO every plugin should be treated
as a different
So what happens if a plug-in is added to the core (e.g. a YUI and/or GWT
plugin to compliment the dojo one), does that necessitate a 2.2?
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Benedict" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 8:21 PM
Subject: R
