I may have gotten the wrong impression, but it seems all SideWiki
content is stored in Google. I have a thing about letting Google
owning all the world's data.
Paul
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
>> Can we defer the
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Can we defer the research into another wiki? I would at least get into
> Confluence and then move everything to something new, if desired.
Sigh. Please just take 2 minutes to look at what Sidewiki is. It's not
something else we would move ou
Can we defer the research into another wiki? I would at least get into
Confluence and then move everything to something new, if desired.
Paul
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
>> Thanks Martin and Wendy for your replie
[x] Yes, accept the XWork project
-Wes
On 12/26/09, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> [X] Yes, accept the XWork project
>
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
>> This is a vote for the Struts PMC to formally accept the donation of
>> the XWork project from OpenSymphony. This is a req
[X] Yes, accept the XWork project
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
>> This is a vote for the Struts PMC to formally accept the donation of
>> the XWork project from OpenSymphony. This is a required step of the IP
>> Clearance procedure documented here:
>>
>> http://incubator
[X] Yes, accept the XWork project
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> This is a vote for the Struts PMC to formally accept the donation of
> the XWork project from OpenSymphony. This is a required step of the IP
> Clearance procedure documented here:
>
> http://incubator.apac
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> This is a vote for the Struts PMC to formally accept the donation of
> the XWork project from OpenSymphony. This is a required step of the IP
> Clearance procedure documented here:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
>
>
My own vote:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> [X] Yes, accept the XWork project
> [ ] I don't really care one way or the other
> [ ] No, do not accept the XWork project, for these reasons (please specify)
--
Martin Cooper
This is a vote for the Struts PMC to formally accept the donation of
the XWork project from OpenSymphony. This is a required step of the IP
Clearance procedure documented here:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
The XWork artifacts and software grant are available for your perusa
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Thanks Martin and Wendy for your replies.
>
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
>> If you're concerned about the need for committership, then certainly
>> the bar is a bit higher than just filing an iCLA. However, it's
>
Thanks Martin and Wendy for your replies.
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> If you're concerned about the need for committership, then certainly
> the bar is a bit higher than just filing an iCLA. However, it's
> absolutely possible to gain committership for documentation,
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> I would like to move the Struts 1 documentation from SVN to
> Confluence. As old (10 years almost?!) as Struts 1 is, today it is not
> possible for any community member to update it without having SVN
> commit access. I think it's too high a
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> I would like to move the Struts 1 documentation from SVN to
> Confluence. As old (10 years almost?!) as Struts 1 is, today it is not
> possible for any community member to update it without having SVN
> commit access. I think it's too high a
2009/12/26 Paul Benedict :
> I would like to move the Struts 1 documentation from SVN to
> Confluence. As old (10 years almost?!) as Struts 1 is, today it is not
> possible for any community member to update it without having SVN
> commit access. I think it's too high a bar. Does anyone have any
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
