Re: New Struts 2 Documentation Wiki - Next Step Improving Tutorials

2009-12-30 Thread Musachy Barroso
I understand what you are saying and as I said previously I agree with it. As for myself i always like to setup things by hand at least once so I understand better how everything is related. From your tutorial you can always link to the archetypes so anyone familiar with maven and who doesn't want

Re: New Struts 2 Documentation Wiki - Next Step Improving Tutorials

2009-12-30 Thread phillips1021
Lukasz: I appreciate your concern about not confusing users between the tutorials that use Maven and the Struts 2 Maven blank and other archetypes. I think the Struts 2 blank Maven archetype is useful for experienced Struts 2 developers who use Maven. But I don't think the Struts 2 Mave

Re: New Struts 2 Documentation Wiki - Next Step Improving Tutorials

2009-12-30 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2009/12/30 phillips1021 : > Instead of just referring the user to the Maven Struts 2 blank archetype > (which isn't available for 2.1.8.1 last time I checked) I'd like to create a > tutorial for how to setup a Struts 2 web application that uses Maven to > manage artifact dependencies (what to put i

Re: Moving Struts 1 Doc to Confluence

2009-12-30 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: > Niall, > > You're against moving it? As in you don't like the idea or you would > block it from moving forward? Are there really many people (even one?) that wants to contribute to Struts 1 docs? Niall > Paul > > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 12

developer

2009-12-30 Thread Ninad Kulkarni
developer