On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> I think I might have lost privileges to JIRA. I am unable to resolve
> issues in the Struts 2 (WW) project. It has been a while since I tried
> to close/resolve an issue, so I don't know if I wasn't paying
> attention when I should have spok
I think I might have lost privileges to JIRA. I am unable to resolve
issues in the Struts 2 (WW) project. It has been a while since I tried
to close/resolve an issue, so I don't know if I wasn't paying
attention when I should have spoken up.
-Wes
--
Wes Wannemacher
Head Engineer, WanTii, Inc.
N
2011/12/6 Maurizio Cucchiara :
> And I guess that was the reason because the commons deps were shaded
> before.
But it was very hard for devs to work on, also some users were
complaining about that. I know it's hard to maintain different
versions of Commons but right now I don't see a good way to
2011/12/6 Steven Benitez :
> It should probably reference the last release (not snapshot).
Why not snapshot ? It's the simplest way to get wider involvement ;-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
---
Thanks to Wes we're ready to go! Tomorrow I'm going to start working
on the 2.3.1 release!
Kind regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
-
To unsubscr
It should probably reference the last release (not snapshot).
2011/12/6 Łukasz Lenart
> 2011/12/5 Dave Newton :
> > http://struts.apache.org/2.x/
> >
> > Lists the S2 download as 2.3.1-SNAPSHOT; is this on purpose?
>
> Is it a problem ? It's a site effect of using variables in the template,
> eg
This sounds good to me. I'm glad to chip in and contribute, as well.
2011/12/6 Łukasz Lenart
> Hello all,
> For the last few days I was cleaning up JIRA and moved some of
> theissues to 3.x or future, some of them were already solved and so
> on.You can check the results here [1]
> There is stil
On 6 December 2011 16:12, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> That is what was meant, moving to a later version... Personally, I
> dislike depending on commons because it is too *common* (couldn't
> resist). commons-* are usually the dependencies that I have to
> manually resolve conflicts with because it s
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> That is what was meant, moving to a later version... Personally, I
> dislike depending on commons because it is too *common* (couldn't
> resist). commons-* are usually the dependencies that I have to
> manually resolve conflicts with becau
Hello all,
For the last few days I was cleaning up JIRA and moved some of
theissues to 3.x or future, some of them were already solved and so
on.You can check the results here [1]
There is still 5 issues to be solved before releasing 2.3.1
version(hope I'll do them during this week).
Regarding vers
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara
wrote:
> It works on my IU-110.365.
>
> * Assuming no compatibility issues, anyone have objections to cranking up
>> the Commons version dependencies?
>>
> Sorry, what does it mean "cracking up" :), do you mean update to the latest
> version?
T
It works on my IU-110.365.
* Assuming no compatibility issues, anyone have objections to cranking up
> the Commons version dependencies?
>
Sorry, what does it mean "cracking up" :), do you mean update to the latest
version?
> * Can we drop the J4 profile? (I vote +1)
>
+1 (struts2 needs at least
Has anyone set up IntelliJ on a checkout of the S3 branch and had it come
close to being functional? The number of issues I'm having is even more
than I expected.
Quick S3 questions:
* Assuming no compatibility issues, anyone have objections to cranking up
the Commons version dependencies?
* Can
2011/12/5 Dave Newton :
> http://struts.apache.org/2.x/
>
> Lists the S2 download as 2.3.1-SNAPSHOT; is this on purpose?
Is it a problem ? It's a site effect of using variables in the template, eg.
#set($aname=$currentVersion.replaceAll('\.', ""))
http://struts.apache.org/download
14 matches
Mail list logo
