2013/1/22 Paul Benedict :
> No objects. While I personally prefer 1.x, 2.x, 3.x, I won't stand in the
> way of your choices. :-)
Opinions of others are always important :-)
I thought about the same but it looks a bit strange to me:
/1.x/1.3.10/
/2.x/2.2.1.1/
but the same as these:
/1/1.3.10/
/2/
No objects. While I personally prefer 1.x, 2.x, 3.x, I won't stand in the
way of your choices. :-)
Paul
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> No objections?
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Łukasz
> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
>
> 2013/1/21 Lukasz Lenart :
> > To move discus
No objections?
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
2013/1/21 Lukasz Lenart :
> To move discussion forward:
>
> /1/xxx -> all the subsites related to Struts 1
> /2/xxx -> all the subsites related to Struts 2
> /3/xxx -> all the subsites related to Struts 3 (in the future
Hi,
I've added some optimisation to reduce number of blocked threads and
reduce number of calls to ConfigurationManager#getConfiguration() (via
Dispatcher#getContainer()).
Could you test your applications with the latest snapshot version? All
these changes are related to [1] and previously discov
Github user feiqitian closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/struts2/pull/4
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
