> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:20:31 -0400
> Subject: Re: Struts 2.5
> From: davelnew...@gmail.com
> To: dev@struts.apache.org
>
> I'm not excited about keeping the deprecated plugins around; IMO it implies
> support.
>
> People still ask questions about the Dojo plugin on Stack Overflow, running
If you move them into a separate module for 2.5, just don't include it in
the parent's build process (include it only as a special Maven profile).
It's someone is a die-hard hacker and wants to build it themselves, they
can.
PS: When 3.0 comes around, I recommend we split off all plugins into
inde
I'm not excited about keeping the deprecated plugins around; IMO it implies
support.
People still ask questions about the Dojo plugin on Stack Overflow, running
in S2.3. The plugin must die.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Paul Benedict
wrote:
> Ah, struts-extras... how time comes full circle
Ah, struts-extras... how time comes full circle. Struts 1 had its extra
package too:
http://struts.apache.org/development/1.x/struts-extras/
What does creating the new project buy us? or an end-user? Just curious.
Not criticizing; just wanting to learn your plan.
Cheers,
Paul
On Wed, Sep 17, 20
One more idea: instead of dropping deprecated plugins, move them into
a new project ie. struts-extras, so the Struts project will consist
of:
- struts-framework
- struts-examples
- struts-apps
- struts-archetypes
- struts-extras
- struts-website (on SVN)
As far I can recall there was discussion ab
