[GitHub] struts pull request: WW-4594: Configure TilesDefs by annotating Ac...

Github user cnenning commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/85#discussion_r50693282 --- Diff: plugins/tiles/src/test/java/org/apache/struts2/tiles/TestStrutsTilesAnnotationProcessor.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@ +package

[GitHub] struts pull request: WW-4594: Configure TilesDefs by annotating Ac...

GitHub user cnenning opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/85 WW-4594: Configure TilesDefs by annotating Actions Adds annotations for each element from `tiles.xml` to annotate actions. Those annotations are processed by a new class in tiles-plugin which is

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA3

2016-01-22 18:26 GMT+01:00 Greg Huber : > Best I can come up with is > com.opensymphony.xwork2.config.implActionConfigMatcher creates a new > ActionConfig but then only uses the default allowed names: > > return new ActionConfig.Builder(pkgName, orig.getName(), className) >

Re: [CLOSED][VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA3

Vote passed with result: [X] Beta - 3x +1 (binding) Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ 2016-01-21 14:56 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart : > The Apache Struts 2.5 BETA3 test build is now available. > > New in BETA1 > - XWork source was merged into

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA3

OK WW-4596. I did try to find out where the orig object comes from to create pull request, but I was unable to fathom it out. Needs better documentation in the source. So I guess a finial solution would be better form someone who understands what is going on. Cheers Greg. On 25 January 2016 at