Github user lukaszlenart commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/157
I would wait a bit and give Adam a chance to post a comment (if he wants
to). No rush :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user sdutry commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/157
@lukaszlenart
Sorry for breaking it in the first place. That wasn't my intention.
Do you want me to merge this now, or am i still overlooking stuff?
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user lukaszlenart commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/157
I think we are good here, thanks a lot for yours work :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user sdutry commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/157
> After the commit above, any IP with 3 digits in the last octet will not
pass validation
You are right, i forgot the grouping (meaning the or statements mean
something completely different),
Github user atcazzual commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/157
The expression did not seem to work at all until I escaped the slashes,
changing `/` to `\/`
Once I got it working, there then seems to be a bug in the new expression
when matching on U
Hi
We are almost good to go ... there is one issue to be reviewed and I
can start the release process.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/WW/versions/12341116
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/158
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user cnenning commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/158
sounds great ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user lukaszlenart commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/158
With the `ActionInvocation` in place I can access an action which means the
action can provide additional informations how to serialise/deserialize
object/string via dedicated interfaces, e.g.
Github user cnenning commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/158
and what is your idea?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user lukaszlenart commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/158
Merge it first as I think those changes are less intrusive as the whole
idea in my head ;-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user cnenning commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/158
Do you want to further develop this PR or merge it first?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/155
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/153
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
14 matches
Mail list logo
