Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18969.1

I have to cancel this vote, sorry for that :( I added incremental build number calculation to the workflow and the pre-release version has changed. Once I will address all the issues I will re-call the vote. Once again sorry for the mess Łukasz czw., 7 sie 2025 o 23:38 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a

[VOTE] Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18969.1

The Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18969.1 test build is now available. Please see the changelog: https://github.com/apache/struts-intellij-plugin/releases/tag/untagged-148e962bc254f6c38d40 [ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) Everyone who has tested the build is

A new version of Struts IntelliJ IDEA plugin

Hi, I just updated the build & release process to allow publishing new versions of the plugin into Jetbrain Marketplace. This version doesn't address any fixes or features, its only purpose was to test the whole process. Right now I will try to upgrade to support IntelliJ version 2025.1.x Apache

Claude Code

Hi, I prepared a PR with a basic set of files which can be helpful when using Claude Code AI to work with Apache Struts. Any comments are welcome :) https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1295 Cheers Łukasz - To unsubscribe, e-

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Struts Annotations 2.0

Vote passed with result: +1 binding x3 Cheers Lukasz sob., 28 cze 2025 o 16:24 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > The Struts Annotations 2.0 test build is now available as a Maven artifact. > This version uses Java 17 as a minimal version of JDK. > All the changes: > https://github.co

Re: [VOTE] Struts Annotations 2.0

sob., 28 cze 2025 o 16:24 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > [X] General Availability (GA) +1 (binding) Cheers Łukasz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: de

[VOTE] Struts Annotations 2.0

The Struts Annotations 2.0 test build is now available as a Maven artifact. This version uses Java 17 as a minimal version of JDK. All the changes: https://github.com/apache/struts-annotations/releases/tag/STRUTS_ANNOTATIONS_2_0 Staging artifacts are available here: https://repository.apache.org/c

Re: Upgrade to OGNL 3.5.x

; > > There's also still the issue of breaking extension point API by > > migrating from the Map parameter type to another. I know we've had > > SemVer complaints in the past - > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-5251?focusedCommentId=17830550 > >

Compress tag

Hi I'm working on implementing tag which can be used to improve generated HTML by stripping out empty spaces and line breaks. https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1272 It has some limitation especially around empty spaces and line breaks inside the tag, eg: ... In such cases compression won't

Re: Explicitly archiving old struts versions

Thanks for pointing this out! Already requested INFRA to archive the repo https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26793 and there is no Struts 1 related versions in https://downloads.apache.org/struts/ Cheers -- Łukasz wt., 6 maj 2025 o 10:42 Arnout Engelen napisał(a): > > Hello, > > It mi

Re: Upgrade to OGNL 3.5.x

śr., 2 kwi 2025 o 02:12 Kusal Kithul-Godage napisał(a): > It seems the surface area of changes is large and has an API breaking > impact on multiple extension points. I expect the OGNL upgrade itself > could also cause breaking behavioural changes. If we're to abide by > SemVer here, we should pro

Upgrade to OGNL 3.5.x

Hi, I'm working on upgrading to the latest OGNL, I targeted 3.4.6 first, but that won't work and I have started by introducing a more generic OgnlContext in OGNL to support Struts requirements. You can review this work here https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1249 Cheers Łukasz -

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Struts 6.7.4

Vote passed with result: +1 GA (binding) x3 Thanks a lot! Łukasz czw., 27 lut 2025 o 07:13 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > The Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is available. With this release the > following issues were addressed: > > Bug > [WW-5493] - Removing parameters broke

Re: STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0

t;> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 28 Feb 2025, at 15:28, Greg Huber wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Well it only likes jkd17? Should this be jdk8 as its v6? > >>>>>>> > >>>>&

Re: STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0

pt., 28 lut 2025 o 12:28 Greg Huber napisał(a): > > | https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/tree/STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0 > > Thanks, missed it, and its not oblivious using the branch name. Maybe a > note somewhere on the landing page? I created a Github Release out of the tag and added a note t

Re: [VOTE] Struts 6.7.4

czw., 27 lut 2025 o 07:13 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] General Availability (GA) +1 (binding) Cheers Łukasz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.ap

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Apache Struts 7.0.3

Vote passed with result: GA +1 binding x3 GA +1 non-binding x2 Thanks! Łukasz czw., 27 lut 2025 o 07:09 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > pon., 24 lut 2025 o 13:14 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > [ ] Leave at test build > > [ ] Alpha > > [ ] Beta > > [X] General Ava

Re: WAR undeploy seems to leave some struts related classes in memory

pt., 28 lut 2025 o 11:55 Greg Huber napisał(a): > > Maybe comparing your test case with the showcase setup may give a hint > on a config issue. > > @Lukasz do we need a tag for the last javax examples? https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/tree/STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0 Cheers Łukasz -

[VOTE] Struts 6.7.4

The Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is available. With this release the following issues were addressed: Bug [WW-5493] - Removing parameters broke custom components [WW-5497] - Access to non-static members of class objects fails with IllegalArgumentException [WW-5498] - with devMode enabled causes

Re: [VOTE] Apache Struts 7.0.3

pon., 24 lut 2025 o 13:14 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] General Availability (GA) +1 (binding) Cheers Łukasz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.ap

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is ready

sob., 22 lut 2025 o 10:56 i...@flyingfischer.ch.INVALID napisał(a): > There may very well be reasons to stay for some time on Tomcat 9, which > will be supported for a long time as far as I know. While it is > advisable to do so, we should not try to force users to migrate to > JakartaEE. I do no

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is ready

wt., 25 lut 2025 o 02:51 戸田 栞太（HARP） napisał(a): > > I am planning to upgrade to Struts 7, but since the Java version will also be > upgraded, I am still preparing. > Has the EOL for Struts 6 been decided? No decision yet and I don't see an immediate requirement to do it. Cheers Łukasz --

Re: WAR undeploy seems to leave some struts related classes in memory

sob., 22 lut 2025 o 13:16 Ing. Andrea Vettori napisał(a): > Hope someone can give me an hint on what to look into. I tried to navigate > the two objects with the memory analyzer but it’s too difficult to understand > what’s going on. Could you increase log level to DEBUG and check if you see "D

[VOTE] Apache Struts 7.0.3

The Apache Struts 7.0.3 test build is available. This is the first patch release of Struts 7.x series. With this release the following issues were addressed: Bug [WW-5495] - Tomcat 11 and ".action" send empty page [WW-5498] - with devMode enabled causes actionError [WW-5500] - Multipart Requests

Re: email issue

sob., 22 lut 2025 o 11:40 Greg Huber napisał(a): > >You are responding to the list, but the list server spreads the mail > >to subscribers using FROM: header with your email address > > Just got another one. > > here is the source: no myid.amitsharma?? > This is exactly what I wrote > User-Agen

Re: mail issue

sob., 22 lut 2025 o 11:21 Greg Huber napisał(a): > I am replying to dev@struts.apache.org so where is the email address > coming from? You are responding to the list, but the list server spreads the mail to subscribers using FROM: header with your email address Regards Łukasz -

Re: mail issue

sob., 22 lut 2025 o 10:50 Greg Huber napisał(a): > > Can this be fixed, get alot of these returns > > > mx.google.com rejected your message to the following email addresses: > > myid.amitsha...@gmail.com > Your message wasn't delivered because the recipient's email provider > rejected it. > > mx.g

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is ready

sob., 22 lut 2025 o 10:46 Greg Huber napisał(a): > > What is the plan on v6? Continue development or maintenance only? I would prefer to switch into maintenance mode only, yet it depends on users Cheers Łukasz - To unsubscrib

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is ready

Thanks a lot for testing & confirming! Any plans to migrate to Struts 7? pt., 21 lut 2025 o 12:06 戸田 栞太（HARP） napisał(a): > > I've confirmed that it works with Struts 6.7.4. > > Thank you for the fix! > > On 2025/02/20 14:01:53 Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > Hello, &

[TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is ready

Hello, This is a patch release of Struts 6.x.x which contains only non-breaking changes. Please take the time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please report any problems you will spot. Here are the changes from the previous version: https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag/STRUTS

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.0.3 test build is ready

pon., 17 lut 2025 o 17:27 Burton Rhodes napisał(a): > > Thanks Lukasz! > > Quick question: With v7.0.3, what is the current status of the Multipart > upload logic? > > These 2 release comments are somewhat conflicting: > 6.7: WW-5528 Ensure multipart upload illegal characters reported as > error b

Re: file upload name filtering

6.7.3 & 7.0.3 test builds are ready, enjoy! niedz., 16 lut 2025 o 08:21 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > And the same for 7.x > https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1219 > > niedz., 16 lut 2025 o 08:07 Lukasz Lenart > napisał(a): > > > > PR reverts changes in 6

[TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.3 is ready

Hello, This is a patch release of Struts 6.x.x which contains only non-breaking changes. Please take the time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please report any problems you will spot. Here are the changes from the previous version: https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag/STRUTS

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.2 test build is ready

t > included in the "params". It seems that the exclusion patterns added to > "DefaultExcludedPatterns" may be affecting this. > ・When the "enctype" is set to "application/x-www-form-urlencoded", I am able > to retrieve the token. > &

[TEST] Apache Struts 7.0.3 test build is ready

Hello, This is a patch release of Struts 7.x which contains only non-breaking changes. Please take your time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please report any problems you will spot. Here are the changes from the previous version: https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag/STRUTS_

Re: file upload name filtering

And the same for 7.x https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1219 niedz., 16 lut 2025 o 08:07 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > PR reverts changes in 6.7.x > https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1218 > > sob., 15 lut 2025 o 08:10 Kusal Kithul-Godage > napisał(a): > > &

Re: file upload name filtering

f implemented as a > protected method on AbstractMultiPartRequest, applications can easily > disable or customise the behaviour using the existing > 'struts.multipart.parser' extension point. > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 5:16 AM Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > > > Right now I'm

Re: file upload name filtering

Right now I'm looking at the "defaultStack": ... ... and escaping/normalising normal form fields doesn't make sense as this will happen in "params" interceptor. What should happen is a better control over file names. czw., 13 lut 2025 o 19:00 Lukasz Lenar

Re: file upload name filtering

> >>> a system by just having a few malicious characters in a file name? > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Burton > >>> > >>> > >>> -- Original Message -- > >>> From "Greg Huber&q

Re: file upload name filtering

valid. That said, > are we able to override the excluded file pattern in some way (e.g. > struts properties)? > > private static final String EXCLUDED_FILE_PATTERN = > "^(.*[<>&\"'|;/?*:]+.*|.*\\.\\..*)$"; > > Thanks, > Burton > > >

Re: file upload name filtering

ing char > > af517d82-8583-11eb-a3d0-06b4694bee2a_2Fmedia-manager_2F1738545771934-House_20&_20Home_20-_20HI-RES.png > > On 09/02/2025 09:27, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > niedz., 9 lut 2025 o 10:20 Greg Huber napisał(a): > >> Still using v6 at the moment, but I think v7

Re: file upload name filtering

niedz., 9 lut 2025 o 10:20 Greg Huber napisał(a): > > Still using v6 at the moment, but I think v7 (dev box) is the same? The same in functionality, but harder to refactor some things. I made a few changes in the logic used in v7 and it's hard to port them back into v6. Anyway, I will take a look

Re: file upload name filtering

niedz., 9 lut 2025 o 10:10 Greg Huber napisał(a): > > I have now had a few uploads blocked mainly due to sentence punctuation > in the image name ie apostrophe and ampersand symbols. > > It would be better here to just escape the string and warn rather than > just block it, requiring the user to r

Re: file upload name filtering

etrieved by MultiPartRequest#getErrors like we have for other > > validations. What do you think? > > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 5:59 PM Lukasz Lenart wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> This is a patch release of Struts 6.x.x which contains only > >

Re: Replace @Inject

śr., 5 lut 2025 o 10:13 Greg Huber napisał(a): > > Struts has its own DI using @Inject annotation > > This could be a bonus as it not "another" dependency on the framework. > > Over time, the fewer dependencies the better. That's true, but the existing @Inject conflicts with JavaEE @Inject, also

Replace @Inject

Hi, Struts has its own DI using @Inject annotation (it isn't related to Java one) and I wonder my it's a good idea to replace it with some other DI, yet Guice is too heavy as for me and I found this tiny lib https://github.com/tomitribe/pixie The only problem is the missing licence, so right now

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.2 test build is ready

śr., 5 lut 2025 o 05:20 Kusal Kithul-Godage napisał(a): > > I've just tested this with the Confluence Data Center application. > > The file name filtering is actually causing a user experience regression for > us. > > Previously, we were able to validate the filename manually and display > the us

[TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.2 test build is ready

Hello, This is a patch release of Struts 6.x.x which contains only non-breaking changes. Please take the time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please report any problems you will spot. Here are the changes from the previous version: https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag/STRUTS

[TEST] Apache Struts 7.0.2 test build is ready

Hello, This is a patch release of Struts 7.x which contains only non-breaking changes. Please take the time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please report any problems you will spot. Here are the changes from the previous version: https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag/STRUTS_7

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.0.1 test build is ready

This test is closed as some issues have been discovered, a new test build is underway :) niedz., 2 lut 2025 o 08:38 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > Hello, > > This is a patch release of Struts 7.x which contains only non-breaking > changes. > Please take the time and test the

[TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.1 test build is ready

Hello, This is a patch release of Struts 6.x.x which contains only non-breaking changes. Please take the time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please report any problems you will spot. Here are the changes from the previous version: https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag/STRUTS

[TEST] Apache Struts 7.0.1 test build is ready

Hello, This is a patch release of Struts 7.x which contains only non-breaking changes. Please take the time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please report any problems you will spot. Here are the changes from the previous version: https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag/STRUTS_7

Re: Struts 7.0.1

or > 7.0.1 given the bug is specific to Tomcat 11.0 and Jakarta EE 11, > neither of which are GA. > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 6:24 PM Günter Paul wrote: > > > > Hi Lukas, > > > > for me WW-5496 is open and WW-5495 is not solved. See my comments. > > >

Struts 7.0.1

I'm going to prepare a first patch version of Struts 7, do you miss anything? https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/WW/versions/12355521 Cheers Łukasz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional

Struts 6.7.1

I'm going to prepare a new version of Struts 6.x, any objections or do you miss something to be fixed? https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/WW/versions/12355301 Cheers Łukasz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.a

Re: Deploy snapshot

Fixed! pt., 24 sty 2025 o 07:59 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > I found the issue - typo :D > https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1195 > > czw., 23 sty 2025 o 09:14 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > > > I've run the deploy locally and it was the: > &

Re: Deploy snapshot

I found the issue - typo :D https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1195 czw., 23 sty 2025 o 09:14 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > I've run the deploy locally and it was the: > Uploading to apache.releases.https ... > > So it must be something wrong we deployment config in parent

Re: Deploy snapshot

t is > trying to send things under release/ to the release repo? > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025, 12:27 AM Lukasz Lenart > wrote: > > > Any idea why Jenkins is trying to deploy a SNAPSHOT version of Struts > > 6.7.1 into the releases repository? It's very similar to what we

Deploy snapshot

Any idea why Jenkins is trying to deploy a SNAPSHOT version of Struts 6.7.1 into the releases repository? It's very similar to what we have in the main branch, and I have no idea what's wrong with it; https://ci-builds.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/Struts%2FStruts%20Core/detail/release%2Fs

Re: JSP EL not working post strutsbmigration from 2.5.x to 6.7.0

And again, please ask such questions on the User mailing list https://struts.apache.org/mail.html Is it a duplicated question? śr., 22 sty 2025 o 05:14 Murali Challa napisał(a): > > Hi, > > I'm trying to migrate application from Struts 2.5.33 to struts 6.7.0 but > JSP EL is not working post migr

Re: Facings issues while migrating from Struts 2.5.x to 6.7

Hi, Please ask such questions on the User Mailing list, the Dev list is intended to support development of the framework. https://struts.apache.org/mail.html I made a simple example using struts-examples (where the ${} is used in a few places) and it works, I would check if "session.list" exists,

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Struts 7: action class finder

śr., 15 sty 2025 o 08:51 Florian Schlittgen napisał(a): > > On 15.01.25 08:25, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > I assume you jar > > contains only Convention based actions? > Yes, they are all Convention based actions. > Sorry, I didn't had the time to do more testing. If y

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Struts 7: action class finder

niedz., 29 gru 2024 o 10:48 Florian Schlittgen napisał(a): > I tried it with the struts-example and I could reproduce the behaviour > when I add the constant: > value=".*?/myjar.*?jar(!/)?" /> > > Can you confirm? In my real application I need action loading from an > additional jar file... I ad

Re: Contributing to the wiki (Struts 2.5 -> 6 migration page)

pt., 10 sty 2025 o 16:41 Scott Hiland napisał(a): > > Thank you to the dev team for the excellent work and to Lukasz for the 2.5 -> > 6 migration page. > > I wanted to make a contribution to the wiki regarding an upgrade issue we > encountered on an older system during our move from 2.5 to 6.7 d

Re: YourKit thank you

wt., 7 sty 2025 o 18:02 Martin Gainty napisał(a): > > Any advantage of implementing MyKit instead of JProfiler or implementing IDE > specific profilers (NetBeans, IntelliJ) Just tried to test this tool as I never used it Cheers Łukasz --

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.0 test build is ready

Done pon., 6 sty 2025 o 11:38 Sebastian Peters napisał(a): > > Hello Lukasz, > > Could you remove the "Pre-release" label from the release page? > https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag/STRUTS_6_7_0 > > Thank you! > Sebastian > >

YourKit thank you

Hi, I'm going to add a thank you section with YourKit reference to the README if no objections https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1165 Cheers Łukasz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional

Re: From ??? Re: Re: Re: Struts 7: action class finder

pon., 23 gru 2024 o 21:02 Florian Schlittgen napisał(a): > > On 23.12.24 20:51, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > Could you define your own excluded packages using constant > > "struts.convention.exclude.packages"? The problem I see the > > "com.opensymphony.xwor

Re: Re: Re: Struts 7: action class finder

pon., 23 gru 2024 o 19:42 Florian Schlittgen napisał(a): > Thanks for looking into it. Your examples/tests are alright, but I think this > is not the way it is being called. Please take a look at > org.apache.struts2.convention.PackageBasedActionConfigBuilder.includeClassNameInActionScan(String)

Re: Re: Struts 7: action class finder

czw., 19 gru 2024 o 21:42 Florian Schlittgen napisał(a): > > You're right, the package is supposed to be excluded. So I started > debugging and tracked it down to the > org.apache.struts2.util.WildcardHelper. There seems to be an issue, as > you can see in this example: > > public static void

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Apache Struts 7.0.0

PR with announcement https://github.com/apache/struts-site/pull/258 czw., 19 gru 2024 o 18:56 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > Vote passed with result: > > +1 GA (binding) x4 > +1 GA (non-binding) x2 > > Thanks a lot! > Lukasz > > pon., 16 gru 2024 o 17:40 Lukasz L

Re: Struts 7: action class finder

Hm... but classes in org.apache.struts2 are excluded from scanning https://github.com/apache/struts/blob/main/plugins/convention/src/main/resources/struts-plugin.xml#L57 Could you double check if you don't have a copy of older JARs somewhere czw., 19 gru 2024 o 17:27 Florian Schlittgen napisał(a

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Apache Struts 7.0.0

Vote passed with result: +1 GA (binding) x4 +1 GA (non-binding) x2 Thanks a lot! Lukasz pon., 16 gru 2024 o 17:40 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > The Apache Struts 7.0.0 test build is available. This is the first and > major release of Struts 7.x series which uses Java 17 and JakartaE

Re: [VOTE] Apache Struts 7.0.0

pon., 16 gru 2024 o 17:40 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > [X] General Availability (GA) +1 binding Cheers Lukasz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: de

Re: Missing artifact 7.0.0

; > Does the IDE you use compile OK without staged in the pom? > > Generally I have a list of staged repos on as a default, so don't have > these issues. > > > On 15/12/2024 12:19, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > pt., 13 gru 2024 o 11:11 Greg Huber napisał(a):

[VOTE] Apache Struts 7.0.0

The Apache Struts 7.0.0 test build is available. This is the first and major release of Struts 7.x series which uses Java 17 and JakartaEE. With this release the following issues were addressed: Internal Changes Java 17 is used as minimal supported version Migrated to JakartaEE Stronger security

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.0.0 test build is ready

pon., 16 gru 2024 o 07:27 Kusal Kithul-Godage napisał(a): > Tested with Atlassian's Confluence Data Center along with the > struts2-velocity-plugin. > > Observed one minor peculiarity with > struts.messages.upload.error.FileUploadByteCountLimitException where > the reported 'actual size' isn't con

Re: Missing artifact 7.0.0

pt., 13 gru 2024 o 11:11 Greg Huber napisał(a): > > I am using the standard struts git repo. > > Why is maven only looking for these two in > https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2 and ignoring staging. That's correct. You must explicitly specify if you want to use the staging repository > There i

Re: Struts v7.0.0-M10 missing from Maven Central

czw., 12 gru 2024 o 13:32 Burton Rhodes napisał(a): > > It appears that 7.0.0-M10 is no longer available in Maven Central. > Should I be pointing to a different version? The latest versions I see > in the repository are: 6.7.0 and 7.0.0-M9 > > >org.apache.struts >struts2-core >7.0.0-M

Re: Missing artifact 7.0.0

czw., 12 gru 2024 o 10:57 Greg Huber napisał(a): > > If I add the staging to the struts pom it builds correctly. There must > be something in the way these new jakarta dependancies are configured. > > > > apache.staging > ASF Maven 2 Staging > https://repository.apache.org

Re: Missing artifact 7.0.0

śr., 11 gru 2024 o 12:48 Greg Huber napisał(a): > > For me its tiles > > > org.apache.struts > struts2-tiles-plugin > ${org.apache.struts.version} > > > So I have to now include these jarkarta jars also? But do you want to use Velocity with Tiles? If yes you should include the Ve

Re: Missing artifact 7.0.0

śr., 11 gru 2024 o 12:01 Greg Huber napisał(a): > struts pom.xml > > > org.apache.struts > struts2-velocity-tools-view-jakarta > 7.0.0-M7-SNAPSHOT > > > org.apache.struts > struts2-velocity-tools-jsp-jakarta > 7.0.0-M7-SNAPSHOT > > > May be a timing thing? These artefacts

[TEST] Apache Struts 7.0.0 test build is ready

Hello, This is the first and major release of Struts 7.x series which uses Java 17 and JakartaEE. Please take the time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please report any problems you will spot. Here are the changes from the previous version: https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/t

Re: Struts 7 release plan

pon., 9 gru 2024 o 15:37 Orifhon Zunnunov napisał(a): > Is there a target GA release date for Struts 7 ? No, but except this issue [1] we are ready to prepare the first release [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26325 Cheers Lukasz

[VOTE] Rename master into main

Hi, Looks like I need to get agreement [1] on renaming the master branch into main, so please vote: [ ] agree, rename the master branch [ ] disagree [1] https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml?tab=readme-ov-file#default-branch Cheers Lukasz ---

Re: Struts 7 release plan

Struts 6.7.0 is out, I'm going to cut off a new release/struts-6-7-x branch, then merge Struts 7 PR into master. Any objections? pon., 18 lis 2024 o 08:12 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > Thanks Kusal, you are right! > > pon., 18 lis 2024 o 02:00 Kusal Kithul-Godage > nap

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Apache Struts 6.7.0

Vote passed with result: GA +1 x4 (binding) Thanks a lot Lukasz pt., 29 lis 2024 o 07:26 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > wt., 26 lis 2024 o 07:06 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > [ ] Leave at test build > > [ ] Alpha > > [ ] Beta > > [X] General Availability (G

Re: [VOTE] Apache Struts 6.7.0

wt., 26 lis 2024 o 07:06 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] General Availability (GA) +1 binding Cheers Lukasz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.ap

[VOTE] Apache Struts 6.7.0

The Apache Struts 6.7.0 test build is available. With this release the following issues were addressed: Internal changes A lot of classes have been marked as deprecated because of relocation of them into a new package. All classes from package com.opensymphony.xwork2 will be moved into org.apache

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.0 test build is ready

out, I'll follow up the issue with them. > > > https://www.jrebel.com/products/jrebel/release-notes/202441-5th-november-2024 > > > On 2024-11-25 10:59 a. m., Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > [No suele recibir correo electrónico de lukaszlen...@apache.org. > Descubra por q

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.0 test build is ready

sob., 23 lis 2024 o 02:23 Luis Limas napisał(a): > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalAccessError: class > com.opensymphony.xwork2.config.ConfigurationManager tried to access protected > method 'void org.apache.struts2.ActionContext.(java.util.Map)' > (com.opensymphony.xwork2.config.ConfigurationManag

Re: Struts 7 release plan

se if it were notably less than the effort to actually migrate code > from Struts 6.7 to 7.0. > > I agree it would make sense to drop the '2' from org.apache.struts2 > but if the benefit is only really aesthetic then I'm not sure it's > worth the cost (signifi

Re: UploadedFilesAware SecurityMemberAccess:isAccessible message

wt., 12 lis 2024 o 09:12 Greg Huber napisał(a): > > I have my own stack, so I don't extend struts-default. > > If is removed in 6.7 then there is > no more maintenance overhead.😉 I didn't plan to remove it yet, it's already removed in 7.0 Cheers Lukasz

Re: Struts 7 release plan

niedz., 17 lis 2024 o 12:00 Kusal Kithul-Godage napisał(a): > > Curious what the use case for having both Struts 6 and 7 in the same > WAR would be? In some cases you must rewrite part of your actions and this might help by running two versions of the framework in parallel. It's one of the strate

[TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.0 test build is ready

Hello, This is a minor release of Struts 6.x series mostly because of depreciating a lot of classes. Please take the time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please report any problems you will spot. Here are the changes from the previous version: https://github.com/apache/struts/release

Re: Struts 7 release plan

napisał(a): > > Yep sounds good to me > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 7:56 PM Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > > > Thanks, I think we are good to release Struts 6.7 as there is a lot of > > changes which should help in migration into Struts 7 > > > > pon., 4 lis 2024 o 0

Re: Re: Re: {Disarmed} Antwort: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.0.0-M10 test build is ready

wt., 12 lis 2024 o 08:28 napisał(a): > > Hallo Lukasz, > > for sure - the Test and Action is quite simple > > > > public class DispatcherTest extends StrutsJUnit4TestCase { > > @Test > > public void testParameters() throws UnsupportedEncodingException, > ServletException { > > request.addParamete

Re: Re: {Disarmed} Antwort: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.0.0-M10 test build is ready

pon., 11 lis 2024 o 08:45 napisał(a): > > Hello Lukasz, > > look good to me, our Unit-Tests are fine again. Is it possible to share your unit test in this case? I would like to understand how you use "parameters". Thanks in advance Łukasz ---

Re: {Disarmed} Antwort: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.0.0-M10 test build is ready

Michael please take a look https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1123 If this works I'm going to do the same trick with all other scopes. śr., 6 lis 2024 o 09:54 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > Thanks for finding this, I was wondering why we have such a nasty hack > in the code :D

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.0.0-M10 test build is ready

And follow up https://github.com/apache/struts-site/pull/254 sob., 9 lis 2024 o 09:45 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=293046977#Struts6.x.xto7.x.xmigration-Fileupload > > sob., 9 lis 2024 o 09:21 Lukasz Lenar

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >