RE: [action2] Towards our first release

2006-04-21 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 12:23 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: [action2] Towards our first release > > > At JavaOne, Patrick, Jason, and I will be presenting a > session about Struts Action 2 (deceptively

RE: [ANN] JAVAWUG BOF XVII / Friday 28th April 2006 @ 19:00 / Ora cle City of London

2006-04-20 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Peter Pilgrim ==== > > Dear All > > The JAVAWUG (Java Web User Group) has rescheduled the BOF > XVIII (Number > 17) from Thursday 20th April to now Friday 20th April 2006.

RE: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

2006-04-19 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Bob Lee > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:56 PM > To: Struts Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0 > > > On 4/18/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wo

[ANN] JAVAWUG BOF XVII / Thursday 20th April 2006 @ 19:00 / Oracl e City of London

2006-04-04 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
Dear All I would like to formally announce that JAVAWUG (Java Web User Group) is holding the seventeenth Birds-of-Feather (Meet up XVII) at the Oracle City of London offices on Thursday, 20th April 2006. The meeting will take place in a room with Audio/Visual facilities between 7-9:30 pm. Ther

[test] ignore

2006-02-10 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
Testing using Micro$oft Outlock 200 sp3 I seem to be have problems with my mail sent to google group sent as 7bit character set. Just want to prove that apache and sourceforge dont have to the problem, and eliminate these providers. -- Peter Pilgrim :: J2EE Software Development Operations/IT -

RE: [POLL] Struts Action Framework tagline

2006-01-11 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > > On 1/11/06, netsql <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And... why not Struts, which is what user list calls it, instead of > > correcting them. > > Because, very shortly, we will be adopting the WebWork code bas

RE: [ti] Struts Action 1.x migration tools

2005-12-05 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 December 2005 05:39 > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: [ti] Struts Action 1.x migration tools > > > I'd classify all those goals as those of approach 1, which is > building > 1.x support right in Ti.

RE: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

2005-11-30 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > Pilgrim, Peter wrote: > > > Ok great so is Ted Husted also involved in the 2nd edition > > and I presume Manning is fine with both Struts in Action > > and Webwork in Action

RE: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

2005-11-29 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
n Action in the future ``merging'' as one. > Pilgrim, Peter wrote: > > Hi > > > > 1) Is the WebWork name going to exist still? > > No, at least not in Apache Struts. The WebWork project will probably > stick around supporting 1.x and possibly to host

RE: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

2005-11-29 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > I have a few thoughts on this and I will try to avoid the "Which > framework is better?" discussion. > > Change is inevitable. Struts (as you know and use it today) will > eventually become obsolete. Nob

RE: Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

2005-11-29 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > > By no means do I consider myself the authority to answer these, but > here are some responses based on my understanding and my interest in > how things go. In summary, really a lot of these questions ar

Tough Questions on Struts and Webwork Integration

2005-11-29 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
Hi 1) Is the WebWork name going to exist still? 2) Is the Struts name going to be annexed with WebWork? 3) A users has invested his or her hard-earned cash in `WebWork' in Action book. Will contents of this tome still be relevant in Struts? 4) In fact there are a number of such books on

RE: Thread-unsafe Command classes

2005-09-24 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Wolfgang Gehner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 September 2005 11:06 > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Thread-unsafe Command classes > > > If I want to use Spring I use Spring MVC, but I think a lot > of drive in > Struts evolution is to enco

RE: [OT] Maven dependencies Commercial

2005-09-24 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > You have a couple options. > > Depending on who needs to be to build your project. If it is just > you, then put that jar in your local repository: > > *nix > ~/.maven/repository/weblogic/jars/ > Tha

[URGENT] Struts 1.1 Source Download

2005-08-23 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
Can anyone tell me where I can download the full Struts 1.1 source code other than http://archive.apache.org/dist/struts/ which is being blocked by my clients corporate security ? -- Peter Pilgrim :: J2EE Software Development Operations/IT - Credit Suisse First Boston, Floor 15, 5 Canada Squar

RE: [OT] Ant vs. Maven - convince me! :)

2005-08-09 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > I do see the dependency advantage but as Craig mentioned, Maven isn't > the only way to manage this. > > James figured out a nifty way to handle this through a > "download-dependencies" target in ant. He s

RE: [OT] Ant vs. Maven - convince me! :)

2005-08-09 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
My client is currently with a global bank. How could can Maven help with project dependencies? What are the win-wins here? When I last looked at Maven, it looked like complete C++/C Macro nonsense. I did NOT get it all. So what gives? Does the Struts SVN has a full MAVEN build now? When I played

RE: JDK Version for 1.3.x

2005-04-28 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
How about Java 5.0? "Just jokkin' man" -- Peter Pilgrim Operations/IT - Credit Suisse First Boston, Floor 15, 5 Canada Square, London E14 4QJ, United Kingdom Tel: +44-(0)207-883-4497 > -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 28 April 2

RE: Three more things for 1.4

2005-03-18 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > If I went through some of my old applications, I'm sure I could find > several others. I often passed the action in as a bean and rendered > via a RTE . What does RTE stand for? -- Peter Pilgrim Operations/IT - Credit Suisse First Boston,

RE: POJO Actions and the ActionCommand interface (Re: Configurati on inheritance, module init code)

2005-03-18 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> From: Konstantin Priblouda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > > --- "Pilgrim, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Konstantin Priblouda > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >

RE: POJO Actions and the ActionCommand interface (Re: Configurati on inheritance, module init code)

2005-03-17 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
See mix-ins! > -Original Message- > From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ===/=== > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:08:15 -0800, Dakota Jack > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:54:48 -0800, Craig McClanahan > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I agree

RE: POJO Actions and the ActionCommand interface (Re: Configurati on inheritance, module init code)

2005-03-17 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Konstantin Priblouda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --- Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > What is your antecedent for "this"? Having an > > ActionCommand > > interface? Using an IoC container as an > > ActionFactory? Having a > > Thread

RE: POJO Actions and the ActionCommand interface (Re: Configurati on inheritance, module init code)

2005-03-17 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > > +42 > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:23:29 +0100, Manfred Wolff > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dakota Jack wrote: > > > > >The idea, I thought, was to use the Commands to supplant the > > >RequestProcessor with a composable request pr

RE: POJO Actions and the ActionCommand interface (Re: Configurati on inheritance, module init code)

2005-03-17 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > I've looked at 1.3 and the Chain stuff, but not actually tried it out. > However the original RequestProcessor is still there and > presumably still > works. The default RequestProcessor is now the chain

RE: Flexible config (was Re: Action threadsafe)

2005-02-16 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > This reminds me of this improvement Struts was going to make > a long time > ago, pre 1.1 days for stxx. stxx wanted to extend the Struts > config to > add support for multiple xslt transformations. The problem

RE: ActionContext chain changes committed

2005-02-09 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > > At 11:58 AM +0100 2/7/05, Wolfgang Gehner wrote: > >We don't see a case for a switching contexts within the request > >cycle to a "ViewContext". > > > >- Based on *last weeks* code, we created our own con

svn checkout

2005-02-01 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
Hi Are they any good online docs on using "svn" with Struts 1.3? I tried very last night on my linux box: % svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/trunk struts But I must admit I didnt know what I was doing at all. Do you have to ``svn login'' or whatever? -- Peter Pilgrim Operati

Removal of Author Tags [was RE: Documentation updates part 2]

2005-01-27 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Paul Sundling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > First off, I see that the documentation equivalent of author tags are > still being used. I remember there was the big thing about > removing the > author tags from all java code. There was even an artic

RE: Commons Chain Cookbook: Why have Struts Actions?

2004-12-17 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: BaTien Duong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > > Ted Husted wrote: > > >On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:22:15 +, Pilgrim, Peter wrote: > > > > > >> I was thinking in truth, only providing access to the ``c

RE: Commons Chain Cookbook: Why have Struts Actions?

2004-12-15 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
also refactor that code into a composable request processor / chain implementation. I am sure you'ill agree there is going to be more way to slice a big cheese in half! It's is going to be, therefore, a lot more difficult for tool vendors to say what is the best practice for future S

Commons Chain Cookbook: Why have Struts Actions?

2004-12-15 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
Hello I have read the Commons Chain Cookbook. http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/chain/cookbook.html Regarding the receipe, "Call a Command from Struts", it seems to me that Struts could support the Command more directly in the ActionMapping. Instead of relying on convention, shared database key,

RE: Chain enhancement idea

2004-11-30 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: BaTien Duong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] == > > Craig McClanahan wrote: > > >On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:20:02 -0600, Joe Germuska > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> > >> > >>>I need to have a hook into processValidate() on validation failure. > >>> >

RE: Spring dreaming (was Second call: add "generic" mapped proper ty to ActionConfig)

2004-11-30 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:23:35 +, Pilgrim, Peter wrote: > >> How is learning and remembering up to 5 different configuration > >> files  better for the user?  If I was put in this

RE: Spring dreaming (was Second call: add "generic" mapped proper ty to ActionConfig)

2004-11-30 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === > > > --- Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I agree with Don's assessment, but wanted to add an FYI > note -- Shale > > does zero-config for #3 (because the mapping between a JSP page and > > the co

RE: Think Tank Thread on IoC, CoR, and HaD (hot arse deploy) [was Re: Chain enhancement idea]

2004-11-30 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
I think I got a book at home in the attic that went into so-called ``Hot Deployment'' in great detail. (Been a year since I last looked at it for generic service locator idea, in the end I found myself looking at IoC / Dependency Injections pattern.) It is addison wesley from 2001-2002. Let me

RE: Think Tank Thread on IoC, CoR, and HaD (hot arse deploy) [was Re: Chain enhancement idea]

2004-11-30 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 29 November 2004 01:55 > To: Struts Developers List; Dakota Jack > Subject: Re: Think Tank Thread on IoC, CoR, and HaD (hot arse deploy) > [was Re: Chain enhancement idea] > > > On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:36:27

RE: Maven build

2004-10-13 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > > +1 > ==== > > Ditto for Subversion. I was stunned by how many Subversion > questions there were. It's obvious that a lot of people can > use a "compelling replacement for CVS", that is easy to > in

RE: Roadmap

2004-10-13 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > While I don't disagree with any of Ted's points, I do think that we > need to expand our horizons with Struts Next, rather than just provide > more of the same. We need to move beyond the traditional web app and > emb

RE: Roadmap

2004-10-13 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Mike Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > The other thing I would add is strong debuggability. Is it > true that Tapestry's web > > debugging is the best of the current crop of web > application frameworks? > "Line precise error messages" - are very u

RE: Re: Struts CVS Dependencies on Commons Libraries e.g Collecti ons 3.1

2004-09-10 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:06:08 -0500, Joe Germuska > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 4:59 PM +0100 8/27/04, Pilgrim, Peter wrote: > > >Quick fire questions > >

RE: Subversion?

2004-09-06 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Last I heard, Ted setup a test subversion repository and > everyone seemed > happy with it. Is there anything stopping plans to go ahead > and migrate > our CVS repository? Before you kill off the CVS repository .

RE: I'm now listed as a PMC member

2004-09-02 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Alan Mehio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Congradulation from Alan > > Best Luck from me > > Alan Mehio > London > Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The user guide was updated recently and the "Committer" > section has been > removed and I no

Struts CVS Dependencies on Commons Libraries e.g Collections 3.1

2004-08-27 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
Quick fire questions What are Struts CVS Dependencies with Commons ? Can Struts 1.2.2* work with Common-Collections 3.1? -- Peter Pilgrim Operations/IT - Credit Suisse First Boston, 10 South Colonnade, London E14 4QJ, United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)207 883 4447 =

Struts version 2.0 and Jericho [was StrutsRelease122]

2004-08-27 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
I have been skimping tidbits from the "developer patches" thread through out this very busy week. Just out of interest, what is going on Struts 2.0 / Jericho? -- Peter Pilgrim Operations/IT - Credit Suisse First Boston, 10 South Colonnade, London E14 4QJ, United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)207 883 4447

FW: [OT] Expresso

2004-06-10 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Pilgrim, Peter > Sent: 10 June 2004 13:00 > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [OT] Expresso > > > > From: Pilgrim, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > ---

[OT] Struts Users BOF in London in Monday 7th June 2004

2004-05-28 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
UK Struts Users We have more people (including myself) who are meeting for informal drinks on Monday 7th June 2004 19:15 GMT @ Waxy O'Connor (Irish Pub) in central London, the West End. Peter Pilgrim / CSFB Tim Penhey Niall Pemberton Mike Raath / Bar Cap

[ot] testing 1 2 3 4

2004-05-24 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
testing 1 2 3 4 -- Peter Pilgrim Operations/IT - Credit Suisse First Boston, 10 South Colonnade, London E14 4QJ, United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)207 883 4447 == This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient. If y

[OT] Test 1 2 3 4

2004-04-27 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
Test 1 2 3 4 -- Peter P == This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you received this message in error please delete it and notify us. If this message was misdirected, CSFB does not waive any confide