On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:12:16 -0700 (PDT), Craig
McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think this group can pull off something like
this.
> I suspect you're probably correct about capabilities
> (building an IDE is my day job :-), but building an
> IDE seems a little aggressive to be a reason
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:34:51 -0400, "Ted Husted"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Instead of taking the approach of predicting what
>> developers might want from Struts and JSF in the
>> future
> You probably have little to worry about in this
> regard, Scott. :)
Really? I am glad to hear that Sha
Instead of taking the approach of predicting what
developers might want from Struts and JSF in the
future and providing a few potentially unrealistic and
overly simplistic demos, how about identifying a
complete evolutionary or revolutionary sample web
application and/or web service that would be t
