Re: Add to ParameterNameAware JavaDoc Warning About Using?

Any updates please? -- View this message in context: http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Add-to-ParameterNameAware-JavaDoc-Warning-About-Using-tp5713285p5714001.html Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -

Re: Add to ParameterNameAware JavaDoc Warning About Using?

But i guess its always good to give first preference to strust2 core security check (ie acceptableName check first) as long as struts2 OGNL is vulnerable. Users of strust2 framework should not bypass these default check by mistake by excluding it in acceptableParams. So i hope the following code w

Re: Add to ParameterNameAware JavaDoc Warning About Using?

Hi, I would like to add something to this discussion since i'm the guy who have reported WW-4154 Why && is obvious rather than || We have an Abstract Base Action class which contains some white listed and black list parameter names, using *is

Re: Add to ParameterNameAware JavaDoc Warning About Using?

Hi, I would like to add something to this discussion since i'm the guy who have reported *WW-4154* Why && is obvious rather than || We have an Abstract Base Action class which contains some white listed and black list parameter names, using isAcceptableParam we are handling it. We are not h

Re: [s2] Action ! Method syntax (was Freemarker transform name)

with Patrick in this case. Our xml config file is already enormous and having to duplicate definitions for different methods of the same action would be a real mess. I don't really care about what is set as the "default", but I would really hate to see the ! syntax

Re: 1.3.0

Any chance of getting JSTL added to the Struts-Blank WAR for 1.3? Thanks. On 7/29/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Also, can someone make sure that all of the sub-projects are listed as > >> 'Components' ? > > > Added "Struts Flow" (t