> But does MyFaces depend on Tomahawk components at compile time? This is
> the circular link that has me concerned.
No, that part is different. Its a one-way dependency. I guess there
is nothing that Maven2 can do for you then.
> Don
Sean
---
Sean Schofield wrote:
Agreed. I handled this in scripting by adding an element to each dependency
declaration marking it as optional or not.
I used this new element to create the release notes (combined with
changes.xml) as well as create website docs.
Perhaps we could do something similar i
> Agreed. I handled this in scripting by adding an element to each dependency
> declaration marking it as optional or not.
> I used this new element to create the release notes (combined with
> changes.xml) as well as create website docs.
> Perhaps we could do something similar in Maven 2.
Ma
Greg Reddin ha scritto:
But I'm not sure if Tiles-Struts Action integration will happen in the
Tiles Subproject or as a sub-subproject of Action :-)
Maybe in a sub-subproject of Tiles :-P
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
On Apr 6, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Don Brown wrote:
With the new restructuring, we have three official Struts
subprojects - Action, Shale, and Tiles. Currently, Tiles depends
on Action 1, and through Action 1's EL artifact, Action 1 depends
on Tiles.
I propose we remove this circular dependenc
Craig McClanahan wrote:
It's ok to keep it the way you propose, I guess ... but hard versus soft
runtime dependencies is worth some thought across all of the artifacts, as
we are reorganizing things.
Agreed. I handled this in scripting by adding an element to each dependency declaration markin
On 4/6/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Craig McClanahan wrote:
> > On 4/6/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> With the new restructuring, we have three official Struts subprojects -
> >> Action, Shale, and Tiles. Currently, Tiles
> >> depends on Action 1, and through Action
Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 4/6/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With the new restructuring, we have three official Struts subprojects -
Action, Shale, and Tiles. Currently, Tiles
depends on Action 1, and through Action 1's EL artifact, Action 1 depends
on Tiles.
I propose we remove thi
On 4/6/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> With the new restructuring, we have three official Struts subprojects -
> Action, Shale, and Tiles. Currently, Tiles
> depends on Action 1, and through Action 1's EL artifact, Action 1 depends
> on Tiles.
>
> I propose we remove this circular dep
Definitely +1
--
James Mitchell
On Apr 6, 2006, at 3:52 PM, Don Brown wrote:
With the new restructuring, we have three official Struts
subprojects - Action, Shale, and Tiles. Currently, Tiles depends
on Action 1, and through Action 1's EL artifact, Action 1 depends
on Tiles.
I propo
With the new restructuring, we have three official Struts subprojects - Action, Shale, and Tiles. Currently, Tiles
depends on Action 1, and through Action 1's EL artifact, Action 1 depends on Tiles.
I propose we remove this circular dependency and move the Tiles-dependent EL tags into Tiles its
11 matches
Mail list logo
