Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

retrieve the value. > > Thanks, > Dario. > > -Original Message- > From: Greg Huber [mailto:gregh3...@gmail.com] > Sent: 22 June 2016 10:44 > To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29 > >

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

rame. > > Regards, > Dario. > > -Original Message- > From: Lukasz Lenart [mailto:lukaszlen...@apache.org] > Sent: 22 June 2016 10:15 > To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29 > > 2016-06-22 11:10 GMT

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

> To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29 > > 2016-06-22 11:10 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber <gregh3...@gmail.com>: > > not really sure on your example, but this works, is this the same? > > > > > var="

RE: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

attribute to be able to "fix" all of them with such a work-around in a reasonable time-frame. Regards, Dario. -Original Message- From: Lukasz Lenart [mailto:lukaszlen...@apache.org] Sent: 22 June 2016 10:15 To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE][F

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-22 11:10 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > not really sure on your example, but this works, is this the same? > > > > . > value="%{#list.description}" maxlength="60" size="60" /> > . > WoW! I'm impressed :) Greg can you post your answer here as well

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

not really sure on your example, but this works, is this the same? . . On 22 June 2016 at 10:00, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2016-06-22 10:56 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > > If the style %{#entry.entryId} did not work it would completely break my

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-22 10:56 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > If the style %{#entry.entryId} did not work it would completely break my > system? Which is working OK. It's a case when you have a list and dynamically fetching elements from this list, i.e.: // given String[] list = new

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

If the style %{#entry.entryId} did not work it would completely break my system? Which is working OK. On 22 June 2016 at 09:47, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2016-06-22 10:37 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > > As there are web.xml, struts.xml and dtd changes

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-22 10:37 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > As there are web.xml, struts.xml and dtd changes for v2.5, testing prior > releases is problematic, so best to switch to the latest versions if > upgrading. Also latest versions will get more much testing. The problem is that the

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

As there are web.xml, struts.xml and dtd changes for v2.5, testing prior releases is problematic, so best to switch to the latest versions if upgrading. Also latest versions will get more much testing. Cheers Greg On 22 June 2016 at 09:28, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > The

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

The vote is closed but it would be good if you could next time help us testing a new release. Thanks in advance -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ 2016-06-21 16:15 GMT+02:00 dario.liber...@javelingroup.com : > -1 > > Hi, > > Should 2.3.29 be

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

-1 Hi, Should 2.3.29 be recalled based on the regressions found for all Struts tag name attribute expressions? See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4641 Regards, Dario dot Liberman at JavelinGroup dot com On 2016-06-14 08:07 (+0100), Lukasz Lenart wrote: >

[CLOSED] Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

Vote passed with result +1 (binding) x3 Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ 2016-06-14 9:07 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart : > The Struts 2.3.29 test build is now available. It includes the latest > security patch which fixes few possible

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-16 13:52 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [x] General Availability (GA) > > +1 (b) ;) Thanks! -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

[ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [x] General Availability (GA) +1 (b) ;) On 16 June 2016 at 12:39, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > One more vote is needed :) > > 2016-06-14 9:07 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart : > > The Struts 2.3.29 test build is now

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

One more vote is needed :) 2016-06-14 9:07 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart : > The Struts 2.3.29 test build is now available. It includes the latest > security patch which fixes few possible vulnerabilities: > - Action name clean up is error prone > - Forced double OGNL

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

> [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] General Availability (GA) +1 binding Johannes Geppert # web: http://www.jgeppert.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep 2016-06-14 21:34 GMT-07:00 Lukasz Lenart : >

[VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

The Struts 2.3.29 test build is now available. It includes the latest security patch which fixes few possible vulnerabilities: - Action name clean up is error prone - Forced double OGNL evaluation, when evaluated on raw user input in tag attributes, may lead to remote code execution (similar to