On 3/1/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/1/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [X ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> I cast my vote to fix ActionRedirect in 1.3.8:
> https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-3009
>
> Do
Henri Yandell wrote:
Is the aim to start a vote on 1.3.8 as soon as STR-3009 is ready?
That's my plan. It's a one-liner to fix. I'll put up a 1.3.8 this
weekend and call another vote.
Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
On 3/1/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[X ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
I cast my vote to fix ActionRedirect in 1.3.8:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-3009
Do any other Struts committers object? The complaint is that
ActionRed
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[X ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
I cast my vote to fix ActionRedirect in 1.3.8:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-3009
Do any other Struts committers object? The complaint is that
ActionRedirect does not enforce "redirect=true" in 1.3.5 (but
+1 for GA quality
Niall
On 2/25/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Struts 1.3.7 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* http://struts.apache.org/1.x/userGuide/release-notes.html
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.7/
Maven 2 staging repository:
* ht
On 2/28/07, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/28/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Jouravlev wrote:
> > Paul, do you think that STR-3009 -- ActionRedirect from ForwardConfig
> > not redirecting properly -- should be fixed for 1.3.7 to minimize the
> > impact o
On 3/1/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We choose not to re-use a tag after a build has been released, where
"released" means the PMC has voted on the build. But, if it's still a
test-build, and it would be helpful to retag it for some reason, then
"no harm, no foul". I've been known to
Good info, thanks Ted and Jenri.
Frank
Ted Husted wrote:
We choose not to re-use a tag after a build has been released, where
"released" means the PMC has voted on the build. But, if it's still a
test-build, and it would be helpful to retag it for some reason, then
"no harm, no foul". I've been
We choose not to re-use a tag after a build has been released, where
"released" means the PMC has voted on the build. But, if it's still a
test-build, and it would be helpful to retag it for some reason, then
"no harm, no foul". I've been known to reset a tag up to three times
before calling a vot
On 2/28/07, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
> I believe once a release is tagged, it cannot be undone.
Is this a consequence of the release process? Just curious because I
don't think it's a limitation of SVN.
Frank
Consequence. You don't want to have tw
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
I believe once a release is tagged, it cannot be undone.
Is this a consequence of the release process? Just curious because I
don't think it's a limitation of SVN.
Frank
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [
On 2/28/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
> Paul, do you think that STR-3009 -- ActionRedirect from ForwardConfig
> not redirecting properly -- should be fixed for 1.3.7 to minimize the
> impact of 1.3.5 ActionRedirect behavior?
>
I believe once a release is ta
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
Paul, do you think that STR-3009 -- ActionRedirect from ForwardConfig
not redirecting properly -- should be fixed for 1.3.7 to minimize the
impact of 1.3.5 ActionRedirect behavior?
I believe once a release is tagged, it cannot be undone. There is a
ticket list for 1.3.8
On 2/25/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Struts 1.3.7 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* http://struts.apache.org/1.x/userGuide/release-notes.html
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.7/
Maven 2 staging repository:
* http://people.apache.org/bui
On 2/28/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/28/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The list of issues for 1.3.7 look good. I can't find your PGP key, so
> I'm unable to check the .asc file.
>
> The src in the -all zip happily packages into jars.
>
> Installing the app
On 2/28/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The list of issues for 1.3.7 look good. I can't find your PGP key, so
I'm unable to check the .asc file.
The src in the -all zip happily packages into jars.
Installing the apps into a Tomcat 5.5, I get the following error for
struts-faces-ex
Henri,
Check the DTD version of the Faces example. The 1.3 should contain
cancellable only while 1.2 must have it as a element.
Paul
Henri Yandell wrote:
The list of issues for 1.3.7 look good. I can't find your PGP key, so
I'm unable to check the .asc file.
The src in the -all zip happil
The list of issues for 1.3.7 look good. I can't find your PGP key, so
I'm unable to check the .asc file.
The src in the -all zip happily packages into jars.
Installing the apps into a Tomcat 5.5, I get the following error for
struts-faces-example2-1.3.7:
SEVERE: Parse Error at line 146 column
The Struts 1.3.7 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* http://struts.apache.org/1.x/userGuide/release-notes.html
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.7/
Maven 2 staging repository:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.7/m2-staging-repository/
If you have h
19 matches
Mail list logo
