Vote passed with result
3x +1 (binding)
2x +1 (non-binding)
Thanks all!
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
2016-05-05 21:23 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> The Apache Struts 2.5 test build is now available. With this release:
>
> - All security fixes were ported from previous vers
Looks like I can close this Vote, we have 3x binding and 2x
non-binding votes already
2016-05-05 21:23 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> The Apache Struts 2.5 test build is now available. With this release:
>
> - All security fixes were ported from previous versions
> - XWork source was merged into Stru
>
> I have checked it and with strict-method-invocation="false" on the
package
> element
>
> *Messages*:
>
> org.events.ui.struts2.editor.MyEdit.expirez()
>
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodException:
> org.events.ui.struts2.editor.EventEdit.expirez()
>
>
> Where with it "true" it uses
>
> ..,exp
I have checked it and with strict-method-invocation="false" on the package
element
*Messages*:
org.events.ui.struts2.editor.MyEdit.expirez()
java.lang.NoSuchMethodException:
org.events.ui.struts2.editor.EventEdit.expirez()
Where with it "true" it uses
..,expire,..
Are you sure its on th
2016-05-09 10:09 GMT+02:00 Christoph Nenning :
>> [ ] Leave at test build
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [X] General Availability (GA)
>
> +1, binding
>
>
> Great work, thanks!
>
>
> During my tests I was not able to switch SMI off (strict-method-invocation
> ="false"had no effect). Can you confirm? S
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1, binding
Great work, thanks!
During my tests I was not able to switch SMI off (strict-method-invocation
="false"had no effect). Can you confirm? Should I create jira? The first
one for final 2.5 ;)
Regards,
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1 (binding)
Best Regards
Johannes
Am 05.05.2016 21:23 schrieb "Lukasz Lenart" :
> The Apache Struts 2.5 test build is now available. With this release:
>
> - All security fixes were ported from previous versions
>
2016-05-05 21:23 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1 (binding)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: de
Sorry my mistake ; I confused that issue with this one WW-4558.
On 05/06/2016 06:12 PM, victor sosa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Rest plugin honors Accept header, see WW-4588"
>
> This PR still open and it hasn't been pulled yet. Please check.
>
>
> On 05/05/2016 03:23 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>> The Apache
OK
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[x] General Availability (GA)
On 05/05/2016 03:23 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> The Apache Struts 2.5 test build is now available. With this release:
>
> - All security fixes were ported from previous versions
> - XWork source was merged into Struts Core
Hi,
"Rest plugin honors Accept header, see WW-4588"
This PR still open and it hasn't been pulled yet. Please check.
On 05/05/2016 03:23 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> The Apache Struts 2.5 test build is now available. With this release:
>
> - All security fixes were ported from previous versions
>
Its good for me. Great work, thanks.
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[x] General Availability (GA)
On 5 May 2016 at 20:23, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> The Apache Struts 2.5 test build is now available. With this release:
>
> - All security fixes were ported from previous versions
> - XW
2016-05-06 10:31 GMT+02:00 Aleksandr Mashchenko :
>> Has the s:div tag been removed?
>
> Yes, is was left over from ajax theme.
There were two versions, static and ajax aware - but as far I see the
static version is just simply a so the migration is easy.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 htt
Removed with this issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4614
but we need Aleksandr to clarify why.
2016-05-06 10:28 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> Ups... my bad, there were two versions of it need to check that
>
> 2016-05-06 10:26 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart :
>> 2016-05-06 10:24 GMT+02:00
> Has the s:div tag been removed?
Yes, is was left over from ajax theme.
---
Regards,
Aleksandr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
Ups... my bad, there were two versions of it need to check that
2016-05-06 10:26 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> 2016-05-06 10:24 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber :
>> Has the s:div tag been removed?
>>
>> I now get :
>>
>> No tag "div" defined in tag library imported with prefix "s"
>
> I think it was a Str
2016-05-06 10:24 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber :
> Has the s:div tag been removed?
>
> I now get :
>
> No tag "div" defined in tag library imported with prefix "s"
I think it was a Struts 2 Dojo plugin tag, not a Struts 2 Core tag.
The plugin was deprecated for long time and was finally dropped in
Struts 2
Has the s:div tag been removed?
I now get :
No tag "div" defined in tag library imported with prefix "s"
On 5 May 2016 at 20:23, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> The Apache Struts 2.5 test build is now available. With this release:
>
> - All security fixes were ported from previous versions
> - XWork s
The Apache Struts 2.5 test build is now available. With this release:
- All security fixes were ported from previous versions
- XWork source was merged into Struts Core source, it means that there
be no more xwork artifact nor dedicated jar
- Spring dependency for tests and spring plugin was upgra
OK WW-4596.
I did try to find out where the orig object comes from to create pull
request, but I was unable to fathom it out. Needs better documentation in
the source. So I guess a finial solution would be better form someone who
understands what is going on.
Cheers Greg.
On 25 January 2016 at
Vote passed with result:
[X] Beta - 3x +1 (binding)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
2016-01-21 14:56 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> The Apache Struts 2.5 BETA3 test build is now available.
>
> New in BETA1
> - XWork source was merged into Struts Core source, it means
2016-01-22 18:26 GMT+01:00 Greg Huber :
> Best I can come up with is
> com.opensymphony.xwork2.config.implActionConfigMatcher creates a new
> ActionConfig but then only uses the default allowed names:
>
> return new ActionConfig.Builder(pkgName, orig.getName(), className)
> .methodN
()), but I guess it should come
from the ActionConfig stored in the packageContext or where the orig gets
its allowedMethods from.
Apart from this is works great!
Cheers Greg
-- Forwarded message --
From: Greg Huber
Date: 21 January 2016 at 16:45
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA3
To
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[x] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
Looking forward to see the first GA version. ;-)
Best Regards
Johannes
#
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
2016-01-21 14:56 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Le
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[x] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
Great job!
Am 21.01.16 um 14:56 schrieb Lukasz Lenart:
> The Apache Struts 2.5 BETA3 test build is now available.
>
> New in BETA1
> - XWork source was merged into Struts Core source, it means that there
> be no more xwork
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
I'm fine to release it as Beta: +1 binding
Regards,
Christoph
> The Apache Struts 2.5 BETA3 test build is now available.
>
> New in BETA1
> - XWork source was merged into Struts Core source, it means that there
>
2016-01-21 16:32 GMT+01:00 Greg Huber :
> I cannot seem to get the dmi to work, I get action not allowed:
>
> *This method: save for action eventAdd is not allowed! - [unknown location]*
>
> I then get this error when I add global-allowed-methods :
>
>
> ..
>
> execute,input,cancel([A-Z]*),([
I have got it to start now (missed a dtd, so sorry!)
I now have this:
execute,input,cancel
and get
This method: cancel for action eventAdd is not allowed! - [unknown location]
.EventAdd
eventEdit
memberEvents
${bean.pageNum}
I cannot seem to get the dmi to work, I get action not allowed:
*This method: save for action eventAdd is not allowed! - [unknown location]*
I then get this error when I add global-allowed-methods :
..
execute,input,cancel([A-Z]*),([A-Z]*)
which was what I had before, last time I tested b
The Apache Struts 2.5 BETA3 test build is now available.
New in BETA1
- XWork source was merged into Struts Core source, it means that there
be no more xwork artifact nor dedicated jar
- OGNL was upgraded to version 3.0.11 and it breaks access to
properties as it follows Java Bean Specification, s
Vote passed with result
4x +1 (binding)
2015-09-28 22:53 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> The Apache Struts 2.5 BETA2 test build is now available.
>
> New in BETA1
> - XWork source was merged into Struts Core source, it means that there
> be no more xwork artifact nor dedicated jar
> - OGNL was upgrad
+1
Cheers,
Paul
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2015-09-28 22:53 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> > [ ] Leave at test build
> > [ ] Alpha
> > [X] Beta
> > [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Łukasz
> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
>
2015-09-28 22:53 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [X] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
+1 (binding)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: de
2015-09-30 10:51 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber :
> Also the execute in my default "events" package do not work (same mesage)
>
>
>class="org.events.ui.struts2.core.License">
> ..
>
>
It's the same case here: you are using wildcard mapping instead of
DMI. I will try to find a so
Also the execute in my default "events" package do not work (same mesage)
..
Cheers Greg.
On 30 September 2015 at 09:46, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2015-09-30 10:43 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber :
> > Here is my abbreviated structure:
> >
> >
> > ..
> >
> >
> >
> > ..
> >> class="org.eve
2015-09-30 10:43 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber :
> Here is my abbreviated structure:
>
>
> ..
>
>
>
> ..
>class="org.events.ui.struts2.editor.Favourites">
> .Favourites
>.Favourites
>
> ..
>
Ok, I see the potential problem - it is basically DMI but without DMI ;-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+
Here is my abbreviated structure:
..
..
.Favourites
.Favourites
..
On 30 September 2015 at 09:36, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2015-09-30 10:30 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber :
> > I went back to beta1 where DMI works, I then changed to beta2 and now the
> > execute method is blocked on my a
2015-09-30 10:30 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber :
> I went back to beta1 where DMI works, I then changed to beta2 and now the
> execute method is blocked on my actions eg favourites.
>
> *Messages*: This method: execute for action favourites is not allowed.
>
>
>> Yes, but "execute" is on global-allowed-meth
I went back to beta1 where DMI works, I then changed to beta2 and now the
execute method is blocked on my actions eg favourites.
*Messages*: This method: execute for action favourites is not allowed.
> Yes, but "execute" is on global-allowed-methods in struts-default
If this is the case at leas
2015-09-30 8:34 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber :
> I reverted back to beta1 struts.xml changed the dtd to 2.5, are there any
> other changes needed as I am still getting
Not sue what do you mean by that: did you revert back to BETA1?
> *Messages*: This method: execute for action favourites is not allowed.
I reverted back to beta1 struts.xml changed the dtd to 2.5, are there any
other changes needed as I am still getting
*Messages*: This method: execute for action favourites is not allowed.
I thought the DMI changes were to stop calling adhock methods not execute?
Cheers Greg.
On 29 September 20
+1 (binding)
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[x] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
(disabling SMI on package level still needs discussion ;) )
Regards,
Christoph
> From: Lukasz Lenart
> To: Struts Developers List ,
> Date: 28.09.2015 22:53
> Subject: [VOTE] Stru
2015-09-29 9:47 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber :
> sorry, following https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/47
>
> if I add to my extended package :
>
>
>
>
> execute,input,back,cancel,browse
>
> .
>
>
>
> I get:
>
> Messages:
> This method: execute for action favourites is not allowed!
> Stacktraces
>
Yes,
http://struts.apache.org/dtds/struts-2.5.dtd";>
On 29 September 2015 at 09:12, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2015-09-29 9:47 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber :
> > sorry, following https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/47
> >
> > if I add to my extended package :
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> execute,input,back,can
2015-09-29 9:47 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber :
> sorry, following https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/47
>
> if I add to my extended package :
>
>
>
>
> execute,input,back,cancel,browse
>
> .
>
>
>
> I get:
>
> Messages:
> This method: execute for action favourites is not allowed!
> Stacktraces
>
sorry, following https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/47
if I add to my extended package :
execute,input,back,cancel,browse
.
I get:
Messages:
This method: execute for action favourites is not allowed!
Stacktraces
This method: execute for action favourites is not allowed! - [unknow
2015-09-29 8:57 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber :
> Just upgrading the jars, I now get
>
> ERROR Dispatcher Could not find action or result: /events/license.action
> This method: execute for action license is not allowed! - [unknown location]
How do you configure this action?
> I have not added any DMI secu
Just upgrading the jars, I now get
ERROR Dispatcher Could not find action or result: /events/license.action
This method: execute for action license is not allowed! - [unknown location]
I have not added any DMI security settings, is this correct?
Cheers Greg
On 29 September 2015 at 07:38, Johan
+1 (binding)
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[x] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
Johannes
#
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
2015-09-28 22:53 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> The Apache Struts 2.5 BETA2 test build
The Apache Struts 2.5 BETA2 test build is now available.
New in BETA1
- XWork source was merged into Struts Core source, it means that there
be no more xwork artifact nor dedicated jar
- OGNL was upgraded to version 3.0.11 and it breaks access to
properties as it follows Java Bean Specification, s
ing
> To: "Struts Developers List" ,
> Date: 07.08.2015 10:29
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA1
>
> > Wait but Log4j2 can Log4j directly
>
> How to configure that?
>
> Beside the approach I posted earlier I only found the other solution to
>
kasz Lenart
> To: Struts Developers List ,
> Date: 07.08.2015 15:09
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA1
>
> 2015-08-07 10:28 GMT+02:00 Christoph Nenning
:
> >> Wait but Log4j2 can Log4j directly
> >
> > How to configure that?
>
> I've just added thes
2015-08-07 10:28 GMT+02:00 Christoph Nenning :
>> Wait but Log4j2 can Log4j directly
>
> How to configure that?
I've just added these to my pom
log4j
log4j
1.2.17
and it works
> Beside the approach I posted earlier I only found the other solution to
> throw log4j1 stuff away and create
approach would be to forward log4j2 messages to commons-logging.
But there seems to be no jar that implements that right now.
Regards,
Christoph
> From: Lukasz Lenart
> To: Struts Developers List ,
> Date: 30.07.2015 10:49
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA1
>
>
gate that.
Lukasz Lenart schrieb am 30.07.2015 10:49:20:
> From: Lukasz Lenart
> To: Struts Developers List ,
> Date: 30.07.2015 10:49
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA1
>
> Wait but Log4j2 can Log4j directly
>
> 2015-07-30 10:46 GMT+02:00 Christoph Nenning
:
&g
uch sense but got the test app running fast.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Christoph
> >
> >
> >
> >> From: Greg Huber
> >> To: Struts Developers List ,
> >> Date: 30.07.2015 10:29
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts
hat means struts log messages are forwarded like this:
> struts -> log4j2 -> slf4j -> log4j1
>
>
> Might not make much sense but got the test app running fast.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Christoph
>
>
>
>> From: Greg Huber
>> To: Struts Developers List ,
&
test app running fast.
Regards,
Christoph
> From: Greg Huber
> To: Struts Developers List ,
> Date: 30.07.2015 10:29
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA1
>
> I am seeing this on my console output for tomcat:
>
> ERROR StatusLogger Log4j2 could not find a logging im
I am seeing this on my console output for tomcat:
ERROR StatusLogger Log4j2 could not find a logging implementation. Please
add log4j-core to the classpath. Using SimpleLogger to log to the console...
Any ideas?
There is no log4j-core, would I need to add this manually to my pom?
/WEB-INF/lib/l
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [x] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
+1 Beta, binding
good enough at least for a Beta :)
Great job, folks!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional c
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [X] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
+1 binding
Best Regards
Johannes
2015-07-27 9:19 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [X] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
+1 binding
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-u
The Apache Struts 2.5 BETA1 test build is now available. With this release:
- XWork source was merged into Struts Core source, it means that there
be no more 'xwork' artifact nor dedicated jar
- OGNL was upgraded to version 3.0.11 and it breaks access to
properties as it follows Java Bean Specifica
63 matches
Mail list logo
