On 4/12/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (Yeah, I'm very late catching up...)
>
> On 3/28/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >I had very bad experiences with Dojo so far, and I brought this into
> > >discussion on ww forums. I wouldn't encourage moving to Dojo, becaus
I have some other things going on over the next few weeks that will mesh
nicely with documenting how to do this.
/Ian
Don Brown wrote:
I think the answer to all this is the built-in themes. Right now, I'm
proposing that the current themes use Dojo where an advanced widget is
needed, howeve
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/28/06, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex - I definately agree with you, somewhat ;) - if this is a simple
calendar,
or other lightweight widget there is no need to involve an ajax library
download. *Any* ajax library download. But I do think there is
On 3/28/06, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Alex - I definately agree with you, somewhat ;) - if this is a simple
> calendar,
> or other lightweight widget there is no need to involve an ajax library
> download. *Any* ajax library download. But I do think there is a need
> for an
> aj
I think the answer to all this is the built-in themes. Right now, I'm
proposing that the current themes use Dojo where an advanced widget is
needed, however there could very well be a "prototype" theme, or the
user could replace the default head.ftl (that loads dojo) with their
own. Component
On 3/28/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/28/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would prefere something small and working almost everywhere. We have
> even
> > been thinking to add a new AJAX theme based on lighter solutions (a la
> > prototype).
>
> Heh,
On 3/28/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Joe, I mostly agree with you. What I've been trying to say is that most of
> the user will not like to have a big dependency on Dojo for simple
> functionality like a calendar component.
The "size" of the dependency on Dojo is _complet
(Yeah, I'm very late catching up...)
On 3/28/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I had very bad experiences with Dojo so far, and I brought this into
> >discussion on ww forums. I wouldn't encourage moving to Dojo, because the
> >browser support is still lacking, and from the feeling
Hey there,
I share Alex' opinion on DOJO. We should not add to many dependencies for
"core" components into the themes for now.
DOJO is still quite unstable and we should wait until their basis gets a
bit more stable.
Regarding the other AJAX themes, there were plans already to rename the
current
Alex - I definately agree with you, somewhat ;) - if this is a simple
calendar,
or other lightweight widget there is no need to involve an ajax library
download. *Any* ajax library download. But I do think there is a need for an
ajax theme when the user is ready to use one. So how do we defere
On 3/28/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would prefere something small and working almost everywhere. We have even
> been thinking to add a new AJAX theme based on lighter solutions (a la
> prototype).
Heh, and I considered Prototype too heavy (around 50K) to adopt for my
proje
Joe, I mostly agree with you. What I've been trying to say is that most of
the user will not like to have a big dependency on Dojo for simple
functionality like a calendar component. And I agree, this is my case too. I
would prefere something small and working almost everywhere. We have even
been
I had very bad experiences with Dojo so far, and I brought this into
discussion on ww forums. I wouldn't encourage moving to Dojo, because the
browser support is still lacking, and from the feeling we got from their ml
some of the old browsers, that are still used (f.e. IE 5.5) will be missing
in
pls see inlined
On 3/27/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> STATUS update
>
>
> DISTRIBUTION RIGHTS - LICENSING
>
> JSCalendar for the DatePicker tag
> * Rene will contact author about license change
> * There may also be a Dojo equivalent
>
> FCKEditor for the Richtexteditor ta
Joe Germuska wrote:
At 7:39 AM -0500 3/27/06, Ted Husted wrote:
Walter Zorns tooltip library for all UI Tags
* Is there a Dojo equivalent?
I'm pretty sure there is not.
I haven't looked at the Walter Zorn tooltips, but Dojo does have a
tooltip widget:
http://dojotoolkit.org/~dylan/dojo/te
This is a good followup to what Craig is saying. I accidentally sent
it to Joe
instead of this list - hopefully got it right this time :)
It's not a JS API, but WW does have something similar in the theme's for the
tags.
At the moment we have a dojo theme, but Ranier was going to introduce a
On 3/27/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/27/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I suggest to analyze all tags and to deprecate everything that is
> > already supported in JSTL 1.0.
>
> The tags are listed here, Michael, if you'd lke to run through them.
>
> * http:/
On 3/27/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/27/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/27/06, Gabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > for the tag prefix, I am actually thinking "html" might be best.
> > > While Struts Action 2 is supposed to be a "revolution" in order
On 3/27/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, March 27, 2006 9:22 am, Joe Germuska said:
> > I wonder if there's a way to generalize an "API" out of these so that
> > we are less bound to an implementation. Certainly, a date picker or
> > rich text field which ultimately jus
On 3/27/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/27/06, Gabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > for the tag prefix, I am actually thinking "html" might be best.
> > While Struts Action 2 is supposed to be a "revolution" in order
> > for us to keep the community behind it, we ought to mak
On 3/27/06, Gabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> for the tag prefix, I am actually thinking "html" might be best.
> While Struts Action 2 is supposed to be a "revolution" in order
> for us to keep the community behind it, we ought to make it
> seem as much of an "evolution" as possible. (Otherwise, wh
Hi Ted & Friends,
I could contact the author of FCKEditor and Walter Zorns tooltip library about
a license change or possible dual licensing. Will post back when I got any
information.
rgds
Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: STATUS update
DISTRIBUTION RIGHTS - LICENSING
JSCalendar f
At 9:59 AM -0500 3/27/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
On Mon, March 27, 2006 9:22 am, Joe Germuska said:
I wonder if there's a way to generalize an "API" out of these so that
we are less bound to an implementation. Certainly, a date picker or
rich text field which ultimately just ends up settin
On Mon, March 27, 2006 9:22 am, Joe Germuska said:
> I wonder if there's a way to generalize an "API" out of these so that
> we are less bound to an implementation. Certainly, a date picker or
> rich text field which ultimately just ends up setting a value of a
> single form field should be not t
At 7:39 AM -0500 3/27/06, Ted Husted wrote:
STATUS update
DISTRIBUTION RIGHTS - LICENSING
JSCalendar for the DatePicker tag
* Rene will contact author about license change
* There may also be a Dojo equivalent
Dojo has a date picker:
http://archive.dojotoolkit.org/nightly/tests/widget/te
hanks,
Gabe
- Original Message
From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 7:39:15 AM
Subject: Re: [WebWork2] TODO
STATUS update
DISTRIBUTION RIGHTS - LICENSING
JSCalendar for the DatePicker tag
* Rene will contact author ab
I thought there was some talk of depreciating the tabbedpane (as
opposed to the
tabbedpannel - ajax component). Pat - do you remember anything about this?
/Ian
Quoting Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
STATUS update
DISTRIBUTION RIGHTS - LICENSING
JSCalendar for the DatePicker tag
*
STATUS update
DISTRIBUTION RIGHTS - LICENSING
JSCalendar for the DatePicker tag
* Rene will contact author about license change
* There may also be a Dojo equivalent
FCKEditor for the Richtexteditor tag
* Is there a Dojo equivalent?
Walter Zorns tooltip library for all UI Tags
* Is there a
Ted, others,
I would volunteer to ask for license changes at least for jscalendar,
but I can do the others as well - if there is no one around who has
existing links to the said projects and / or their representatives
making it easier to "get through" (which I do not have explicitely).
Regar
The big item on the Incubator TODO list is verifying distribution
rights. The items here are
(1) Verify that the files that have been donated have been updated to
reflect the new ASF copyright.
(2) Verify that for all code included with the distribution that is
not under the Apache license, we ha
30 matches
Mail list logo
