For what it's worth, this sounds like a good approach to me too. The
theme concept of WW is one of the things that I think a lot of people
that come to SAF2 are going to really appreciate, especially if all of a
sudden there are more themes out there to choose from... I can already
envision an
On 6/20/06, Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2. The current Dojo based widgets are simple enough
> to be used in some
> sample/tutorial like pages but for real life apps
> they don't work (or
> put it in another more realistic way: I haven't been
> able to have them
> working within
At 10:32 AM -0500 6/20/06, Patrick Lightbody wrote:
Just to add to what Jason already said: no one is suggesting getting
rid of Dojo, just that we'd move the "ajax" theme as it exists today
over to the new "dojo" theme and then the new ajax theme would be a
simpler implementation based on DWR a
and of course, Jason could go through my doings just to make sure i get it
right. :-)
- Original Message
From: tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: Tuesday, 20 June, 2006 11:55:29 PM
Subject: Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit
Thanks for the informative
ell.
What do you think? :-)
regards
- Original Message
From: Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 20 June, 2006 11:25:54 PM
Subject: Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit
>
> 2. The current Dojo based widgets are simple enough
> to be use
Just to add to what Jason already said: no one is suggesting getting rid of
Dojo, just that we'd move the "ajax" theme as it exists today over to the new
"dojo" theme and then the new ajax theme would be a simpler implementation
based on DWR and possibly Prototype. When users need more, they are
>
> 2. The current Dojo based widgets are simple enough
> to be used in some
> sample/tutorial like pages but for real life apps
> they don't work (or
> put it in another more realistic way: I haven't been
> able to have them
> working within a normal timeframe).
> I have to mention, that I haven
I think when we start to say "we're going to add value" to a
dependency, then we have to make it a hard dependency, and expect that
everyone using the feature will be using the exact same version of the
dependency.
If we go the "added value" route, then everything related to "adding
value" should
On Mon, June 19, 2006 3:22 pm, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
>> Just to make sure it's really, really clear, because I think it
>> ultimately
>> leads to two different places... If I wanted a treeview widget let's
>> say,
>> it would be built on top of DWR (integrated directly into SAF2 in some
>> fashi
On 6/19/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, June 19, 2006 2:57 pm, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> My understand was the same as Ian's (after a long thread I had with
> Pattrick).
>
> 1. The idea would that WebWork/SAF2 core should provide the means to
> build almost all we can th
On Mon, June 19, 2006 2:57 pm, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> My understand was the same as Ian's (after a long thread I had with
> Pattrick).
>
> 1. The idea would that WebWork/SAF2 core should provide the means to
> build almost all we can think of AJAX based on DWR integration.
Just to make sure it
I have tried to follow this whole thread (but probably I have missed
some aspects, so sorry if I re-sayin something already said or
bringing an arguement already demolished).
My understand was the same as Ian's (after a long thread I had with Pattrick).
1. The idea would that WebWork/SAF2 core s
At 10:34 AM -0700 6/19/06, Don Brown wrote:
This is exactly how Struts Action 2 works today - we package Dojo into our
jar, then let SAF2 serve up its static content through a known prefix,
"struts/" I believe. We also provide hooks to let you serve up other
static content from jars.
yep. I'm
On Mon, June 19, 2006 1:11 pm, Martin Cooper wrote:
>> Comparing DWR and Dojo, I come away with this thought: DWR has a model
>> for
>> doing what is essential RPC, Dojo doesn't (it has the capability of
>> course, but not the API in essence).
>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by this. Have you look
On 6/19/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 10:11 AM -0700 6/19/06, Martin Cooper wrote:
>
>I've been wondering if Dojo shouldn't perhaps be added to the Maven repo
on
>ibiblio. At my day job, we use two DHTML toolkits. I added them to our
local
>repo, and they get incorporated into t
> At 10:11 AM -0700 6/19/06, Martin Cooper wrote:
> I've had a ghost of an idea in my head that you could put a Servlet
> in front of Dojo and serve it out of a JAR so that you had a more
> clear idea of what was in the release -- I've never been too
> comfortable with unpacking the distro and putt
At 10:11 AM -0700 6/19/06, Martin Cooper wrote:
I've been wondering if Dojo shouldn't perhaps be added to the Maven repo on
ibiblio. At my day job, we use two DHTML toolkits. I added them to our local
repo, and they get incorporated into the app using the Maven dependency
plugin. This works real
On 6/19/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, June 19, 2006 12:34 pm, Jason Carreira wrote:
>> 3. Using #2 above we are not forcing user to either
>> use the dojo version
>> in the SAF release, or to muck about updating the
>> dojo version
>> themselves - currently the dojo JS
just dropping them
>
> rgds
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Struts Developers List
> Sent: Sunday, 18 June, 2006 11:22:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit
>
> At JavaOne it was decided to go with D
On Mon, June 19, 2006 12:34 pm, Jason Carreira wrote:
>> 3. Using #2 above we are not forcing user to either
>> use the dojo version
>> in the SAF release, or to muck about updating the
>> dojo version
>> themselves - currently the dojo JS is included in the
>> core JAR file.
>> Not being able to e
See below:
>
> 1. For very basic wrapped widgets the dojo
> implementation is great.
> But, as soon as people start working more in depth,
> problems arise and
> in-depth knowledge of the dojo framework is required.
> I believe Pat's
> xamples of this was debugging issues. This no longer
>
gards.
- Original Message
From: Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: Monday, 19 June, 2006 8:52:45 PM
Subject: Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit
My understanding from the meeting was that we would not pursue
components that simply wrapped other compone
e totally off )
>
> regards.
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Struts Developers List
> Sent: Monday, 19 June, 2006 8:52:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit
>
> My understanding from the meeting was tha
onday, 19 June, 2006 8:52:45 PM
Subject: Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit
My understanding from the meeting was that we would not pursue
components that simply wrapped other components (i.e. dojo widgets).
Instead these components would fall into an "extra" project, separate
from t
Could you expand on the benefits? - I've not had time to follow much lately.
/Ian
--
From Down & Around, Inc.
Innovative IT Solutions
Software Architecture * Design * Development
~
web: www.fdar.com
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone:617.
nt support? Are we going to make them work with dwr instead of dojo? or just dropping them
rgds
- Original Message
From: Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: Sunday, 18 June, 2006 11:22:26 PM
Subject: Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit
At JavaOn
On 6/18/06, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At JavaOne it was decided to go with DWR in favour of dojo. Given this
I would assume that we would not upgrade the version.
I don't believe we decided to get rid of Dojo completely, so as long as Dojo
is in the mix, we should definitely up
ction2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit
At JavaOne it was decided to go with DWR in favour of dojo. Given this
I would assume that we would not upgrade the version.
/Ian
tm jee wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Is there any plan to upgrade dojotoolkit from the current 0.2.2 to 0.3.x?
>
> 0.3.x have lots
At JavaOne it was decided to go with DWR in favour of dojo. Given this
I would assume that we would not upgrade the version.
/Ian
tm jee wrote:
Hi guys,
Is there any plan to upgrade dojotoolkit from the current 0.2.2 to 0.3.x?
0.3.x have lots of really cool stuff and from the bugs list,
Hi guys,
Is there any plan to upgrade dojotoolkit from the current 0.2.2 to 0.3.x?
0.3.x have lots of really cool stuff and from the bugs list, it looks like lots
of bugs have been fixed.
Cheers.
30 matches
Mail list logo
