Just done a quick check of the libs and noticed that 1.3.10 contains
some more recent libs that then 2.1.3 release. Namely;
commons-beatutils (1.8.0 in s1.3.10, .1.7.0 in s2.1.3)
commons-chain(1.2 in S1, 1.1 in S2)
It might be worth syncing these two for the next release :).
Al
Den 22. des.. 2008 kl. 20.52 skrev Dave Newton :
IntelliJ generates an @Override for interface implementations?
This is a new feature of java 6
--- On Mon, 12/22/08, Musachy Barroso wrote:
From: Musachy Barroso
Subject: Re: 2.1.3 release
To: "Struts Developers List"
Da
Oh, yeah, that could be--I didn't check the history.
In any case, it won't compile under 1.5, so I took 'em out :p
--- On Mon, 12/22/08, Musachy Barroso wrote:
From: Musachy Barroso
Subject: Re: 2.1.3 release
To: "Struts Developers List"
Date: Monday, December 22, 20
; I'm compiling under 1.5 (on my Mac) and it definitely bombs with them in
>> there, which makes sense to me.
>>
>> --- On Mon, 12/22/08, Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>
>> From: Musachy Barroso
>> Subject: Re: 2.1.3 release
>> To: "Struts Developer
IntelliJ generates an @Override for interface implementations?
--- On Mon, 12/22/08, Musachy Barroso wrote:
From: Musachy Barroso
Subject: Re: 2.1.3 release
To: "Struts Developers List"
Date: Monday, December 22, 2008, 2:43 PM
-Inline Attachment Follows-
I recently sta
>> I thought I committed the change that took those out; maybe I forgot.
>>
>> --- On Mon, 12/22/08, vikofvan wrote:
>>
>> From: vikofvan
>> Subject: Re: 2.1.3 release
>> To: dev@struts.apache.org
>> Date: Monday, December 22, 2008, 2:29 PM
>>
>
this a 1.5-1.6 thing? I just committed a version w/o the override tags :/
>
> I'm compiling under 1.5 (on my Mac) and it definitely bombs with them in
> there, which makes sense to me.
>
> --- On Mon, 12/22/08, Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
> From: Musachy Barroso
> Sub
it was ok for me with jdk version 1.6
--- On Mon, 12/22/08, Dave Newton wrote:
From: Dave Newton
Subject: Re: 2.1.3 release
To: "Struts Developers List"
Date: Monday, December 22, 2008, 11:39 AM
Not me; the @Override tags are bogus--they're not overriding anything.
Is this a 1
hy Barroso wrote:
From: Musachy Barroso
Subject: Re: 2.1.3 release
To: "Struts Developers List"
Date: Monday, December 22, 2008, 2:32 PM
-Inline Attachment Follows-
It is building for me.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Dave Newton wrote:
> I thought I committed the cha
It is building for me.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Dave Newton wrote:
> I thought I committed the change that took those out; maybe I forgot.
>
> --- On Mon, 12/22/08, vikofvan wrote:
>
> From: vikofvan
> Subject: Re: 2.1.3 release
> To: dev@struts.apache.org
> D
I thought I committed the change that took those out; maybe I forgot.
--- On Mon, 12/22/08, vikofvan wrote:
From: vikofvan
Subject: Re: 2.1.3 release
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Date: Monday, December 22, 2008, 2:29 PM
FYI javatemplates-plugin compilation fails because of the @Override
ple time to comment on the other thread, but
>>> given that there are no objections, I think we can move it out.
>>>
>>> musachy
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:11 PM, vikofvan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> How about moving javatemplate-plugin o
:
>>
>> Yes, I was giving people time to comment on the other thread, but
>> given that there are no objections, I think we can move it out.
>>
>> musachy
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:11 PM, vikofvan wrote:
>>>
>>> How about mov
musachy
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:11 PM, vikofvan wrote:
>>
>> How about moving javatemplate-plugin out of sandbox for 2.1.3 release?
>> will
>> be much appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>>
>>> I wouldn't kno
done
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:11 PM, vikofvan wrote:
>
> How about moving javatemplate-plugin out of sandbox for 2.1.3 release? will
> be much appreciated.
>
>
> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>
>> I wouldn't know, based on my knowledge of tiles (0). But if it i
Yes, I was giving people time to comment on the other thread, but
given that there are no objections, I think we can move it out.
musachy
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:11 PM, vikofvan wrote:
>
> How about moving javatemplate-plugin out of sandbox for 2.1.3 release? will
> be much ap
How about moving javatemplate-plugin out of sandbox for 2.1.3 release? will
be much appreciated.
Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
> I wouldn't know, based on my knowledge of tiles (0). But if it is not
> a problem with struts core itself, it probably shouldn't be a blocker.
>
I wouldn't know, based on my knowledge of tiles (0). But if it is not
a problem with struts core itself, it probably shouldn't be a blocker.
musachy
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Antonio wrote:
> 2008/12/22 Musachy Barroso :
>> argh..this one might be a blocker:
>> https://issues.apache.org/
2008/12/22 Musachy Barroso :
> argh..this one might be a blocker:
> https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2762
>
> Has anyone looked into this?
Blocker? Probably it is a configuration parameter that the reporter did not put.
Antonio
--
argh..this one might be a blocker:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2762
Has anyone looked into this?
musachy
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> I am going to merge the "release" branch into trunk and move the
> remaining open tickets (none of them are blockers
+1
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> I am going to merge the "release" branch into trunk and move the
> remaining open tickets (none of them are blockers, or that important
> actually) to 2.1.4, and then try to make a release tonight. This is my
> first time so sit tight
I am going to merge the "release" branch into trunk and move the
remaining open tickets (none of them are blockers, or that important
actually) to 2.1.4, and then try to make a release tonight. This is my
first time so sit tight :)
musachy
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink
22 matches
Mail list logo
