Found them out in the source ;-)
On 02 Apr 2012 9:58 AM, "Łukasz Lenart"
wrote:
Thanks, but didn't help :-/
>
> On 02 Apr 2012 2:17 AM, "Wendy Smoak" wrote:
>
> 2012/4/1 Łukasz Lenart
Thanks, but didn't help :-/
On 02 Apr 2012 2:17 AM, "Wendy Smoak" wrote:
2012/4/1 Łukasz Lenart :
> Done, I'm missing some release dates, how to find them ?
Check the archives of the announcements list?
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/struts-announcements/
--
Wendy
-
2012/4/1 Łukasz Lenart :
> Done, I'm missing some release dates, how to find them ?
Check the archives of the announcements list?
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/struts-announcements/
--
Wendy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Done, I'm missing some release dates, how to find them ?
Regards
--
Łukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/
mobile +48 606 323 122, office +27 11 0838747
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
On 3/22/2012 3:54 PM, Łukasz Lenart wrote:
I think that's the best part, even without reclassification it clear
shows why to upgrade to latest GA. I think we can introduce that
change smoothly, by consensus. Any objections ?
Your right that would be more effective than reclassification!
Kind
2012/3/22 Robert :
> There is not a perfect solution, as Dave indicated beta may not mean much to
> managers.
Yeah, it does nothing ;-) Beta, Alpha, GA is all the same for them.
> A hard line approach would be to reclassify all prior releases of Struts 2,
> as beta or alpha, does Struts have a n
On 3/21/2012 11:50 PM, Robert wrote:
On 3/20/2012 3:53 PM, Łukasz Lenart wrote:
What do you propose ?
As text
There is not a perfect solution, as Dave indicated beta may not mean
much to managers.
A hard line approach would be to reclassify all prior releases of Struts
2, as beta or alp
On 3/20/2012 3:53 PM, Łukasz Lenart wrote:
What do you propose ?
There is not a perfect solution, as Dave indicated beta may not mean
much to managers.
A hard line approach would be to reclassify all prior releases of Struts
2, as beta or alpha, does Struts have a not recommended classific
2012/3/20 Robert Leland :
> Its more on encouraging users to move to releases where bug fixes and
> security vulnerability fixes have been made.
Ok, but still unclear for me :/
> From the ancient Struts 1.2.0 release notes:
> The /vote/ may also serve to /reclassify/ the /release/ to be of /Beta/
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Robert Leland wrote:
> [...] managers can grasp Beta vs GA.
>
Your optimism tickles my funny bone ;)
Dave
Its more on encouraging users to move to releases where bug fixes and
security vulnerability fixes have been made.
From the ancient Struts 1.2.0 release notes:
The /vote/ may also serve to /reclassify/ the /release/ to be of /Beta/
or /General Availability/ (/GA/) quality, as defined by the Ap
2012/3/10 Robert :
>
> I was under the impression that any release past or present could be demoted
> if deficiency were found.
>
> Perhaps this has been done but may not be clear to a casual user. The page
> http://struts.apache.org/downloads.html
> does only list two releases. However, below
I was under the impression that any release past or present could be
demoted if deficiency were found.
Perhaps this has been done but may not be clear to a casual user. The page
http://struts.apache.org/downloads.html
does only list two releases. However, below that is the wording:
'As a
13 matches
Mail list logo
