On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Niall,
>
> You're against moving it? As in you don't like the idea or you would
> block it from moving forward?
Are there really many people (even one?) that wants to contribute to
Struts 1 docs?
Niall
> Paul
>
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 12
Niall,
You're against moving it? As in you don't like the idea or you would
block it from moving forward?
Paul
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
>> I would like to move the Struts 1 documentation from SVN to
>> Conf
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> I would like to move the Struts 1 documentation from SVN to
> Confluence. As old (10 years almost?!) as Struts 1 is, today it is not
> possible for any community member to update it without having SVN
> commit access. I think it's too high a
Martin,
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> Okay. It was just an idea for how the community can add commentary to
> our content without any of us having to do anything. The community
> could still choose to use it, of course - it's more a question of
> whether or not we promo
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> I may have gotten the wrong impression, but it seems all SideWiki
> content is stored in Google. I have a thing about letting Google
> owning all the world's data.
Okay. It was just an idea for how the community can add commentary to
our co
I may have gotten the wrong impression, but it seems all SideWiki
content is stored in Google. I have a thing about letting Google
owning all the world's data.
Paul
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
>> Can we defer the
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Can we defer the research into another wiki? I would at least get into
> Confluence and then move everything to something new, if desired.
Sigh. Please just take 2 minutes to look at what Sidewiki is. It's not
something else we would move ou
Can we defer the research into another wiki? I would at least get into
Confluence and then move everything to something new, if desired.
Paul
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
>> Thanks Martin and Wendy for your replie
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Thanks Martin and Wendy for your replies.
>
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
>> If you're concerned about the need for committership, then certainly
>> the bar is a bit higher than just filing an iCLA. However, it's
>
Thanks Martin and Wendy for your replies.
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> If you're concerned about the need for committership, then certainly
> the bar is a bit higher than just filing an iCLA. However, it's
> absolutely possible to gain committership for documentation,
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> I would like to move the Struts 1 documentation from SVN to
> Confluence. As old (10 years almost?!) as Struts 1 is, today it is not
> possible for any community member to update it without having SVN
> commit access. I think it's too high a
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> I would like to move the Struts 1 documentation from SVN to
> Confluence. As old (10 years almost?!) as Struts 1 is, today it is not
> possible for any community member to update it without having SVN
> commit access. I think it's too high a
2009/12/26 Paul Benedict :
> I would like to move the Struts 1 documentation from SVN to
> Confluence. As old (10 years almost?!) as Struts 1 is, today it is not
> possible for any community member to update it without having SVN
> commit access. I think it's too high a bar. Does anyone have any
>
I would like to move the Struts 1 documentation from SVN to
Confluence. As old (10 years almost?!) as Struts 1 is, today it is not
possible for any community member to update it without having SVN
commit access. I think it's too high a bar. Does anyone have any
technical objections to this?
Paul
14 matches
Mail list logo
