Martin,
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg03277.html
Is this the discussion? Forgive me if I can't find it. This discussion is about
why it's good to
re-factor out the dispatch code, not why "flavors" were chosen over
subclassing.
Hmm... Now I think you misunderstood my use
Try the list archives. All the discussion is there.
--
Martin Cooper
On 2/16/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why was it designed to use "flavors" instead of subclassing? I don't get
> it. Why code all the
> different types of mappings into one class? If I wanted to add a few mor
Why was it designed to use "flavors" instead of subclassing? I don't get it.
Why code all the
different types of mappings into one class? If I wanted to add a few more, I am
clogging one class
with a ton of different strategies. I find this to be a flaw. I propose this be
broken into
subclasses.
