Martin Cooper wrote:
I've confirmed that an iCLA is on file for you, and have given you
corresponding access to the wiki.
Thanks!
-Dale
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-ma
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Philip Luppens wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Dale Newfield
> wrote:
> >
> >> Philip Luppens wrote:
> >>
> >>> You should file a CLA (contact Martin C. for that or check out the
> >>> pages at t
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Dale Newfield wrote:
>
>> Philip Luppens wrote:
>>
>>> You should file a CLA (contact Martin C. for that or check out the
>>> pages at the Apache site).
>>>
>>
>> I'm pretty sure I faxed in one of these like
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Dale Newfield wrote:
> Philip Luppens wrote:
>
>> You should file a CLA (contact Martin C. for that or check out the
>> pages at the Apache site).
>>
>
> I'm pretty sure I faxed in one of these like 6-9 months ago, but never
> heard any followup...
The problem i
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Dale Newfield wrote:
> Philip Luppens wrote:
>>
>> You should file a CLA (contact Martin C. for that or check out the
>> pages at the Apache site).
>
> I'm pretty sure I faxed in one of these like 6-9 months ago, but never heard
> any followup...
You might want to
Philip Luppens wrote:
You should file a CLA (contact Martin C. for that or check out the
pages at the Apache site).
I'm pretty sure I faxed in one of these like 6-9 months ago, but never
heard any followup...
-Dale
-
To uns
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 5:00 PM, DNewfield wrote:
>
>> OpenSessionBackgroundProcess on that wiki page has a race condition.
>
> The page that google is able to find is
> http://cwiki.apache.org/WW/hibernateandspringenabledexecuteandwaitinterceptor.html
> but I was unable to edit that page. I adde
> OpenSessionBackgroundProcess on that wiki page has a race condition.
The page that google is able to find is
http://cwiki.apache.org/WW/hibernateandspringenabledexecuteandwaitinterceptor.html
but I was unable to edit that page. I added a comment to a confluence based
wiki that I thought would
Chris Pratt wrote:
Using Thread.wait()/Thread.notify() comes to mind.
wait() and notify() are methods of Object, and are what I'm looking for.
Thread happens to be a class object and therefore you can call
Thread.wait()/Thread.notify() but it probably won't be the
synchronization you're loo
Using Thread.wait()/Thread.notify() comes to mind.
(*Chris*)
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Dale Newfield wrote:
> Wes Wannemacher wrote:
>
>> One issue findbugs points out is that the BackgroundProcess constructor
>>> starts it's thread before returning, which means that any subclass won't
Wes Wannemacher wrote:
One issue findbugs points out is that the BackgroundProcess constructor
starts it's thread before returning, which means that any subclass won't
get to finish it's constructor before the thread is started. This is
relevant to the solution offered at
http://cwiki.apache.org
On Sunday 26 April 2009 09:14:44 pm Dale Newfield wrote:
> I don't know if running a static code analysis tool over the codebase is
> part of the release process (getting ready for 2.1.7), so just for the
> hell of it I just ran struts2 trunk through findbugs. It found 37
> "bugs". Most of them a
I don't know if running a static code analysis tool over the codebase is
part of the release process (getting ready for 2.1.7), so just for the
hell of it I just ran struts2 trunk through findbugs. It found 37
"bugs". Most of them are not bugs (but rather not quite best
practices), but many c
> -Original Message-
> From: Wes Wannemacher
> Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2009 14:20
> To: Jason Pyeron
> Cc: 'Struts Developers List'
> Subject: Re: getting to 2.1.7
>
> We've got the JIRA issues pretty well cleared up... Nils
> volunteered to
We've got the JIRA issues pretty well cleared up... Nils volunteered to try to
push the last one out. I'm going to start working on the source to prepare it
for release.
One that that you can help with (I assume by "we" you meant non-committers) is
to try the release candidate after I build it
WW-3087 would be nice to get done. WW-2759 doesn't need to hold the
release, and WW-2827 need more information to be done, so I suggest it
is pushed forward to the next release. I'll try to get WW-3087 done
tomorrow.
Nils-H
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> On Sunday 26 A
; From: Wes Wannemacher [mailto:w...@wantii.com]
> Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2009 12:16
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: getting to 2.1.7
>
> On Sunday 26 April 2009 10:21:02 am Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > Does anyone want to take a shot at the 2.1.7 build? I can
On Sunday 26 April 2009 10:21:02 am Musachy Barroso wrote:
> Does anyone want to take a shot at the 2.1.7 build? I can do it next
> week if nobody steps up. It should be straight forward now :)
>
> musachy
>
I don't mind doing it tomorrow, but I was hoping someone (Nils?) would take a
quick look
2009/4/26 Musachy Barroso :
> Does anyone want to take a shot at the 2.1.7 build? I can do it next
> week if nobody steps up. It should be straight forward now :)
I can try during this week, if I get my account details ;-)
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
---
Does anyone want to take a shot at the 2.1.7 build? I can do it next
week if nobody steps up. It should be straight forward now :)
musachy
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> Looking through JIRA, there are a few issues left for 2.1.7, but once the
> portlet archetype goes
20 matches
Mail list logo
