Cool, I would wait till the end of week or maybe even till the end of
the month to see if there any other doubts and then we can go ahead
and merge the PR.
pon., 14 sty 2019 o 19:33 Yasser Zamani napisał(a):
>
>
>
> On 1/13/2019 4:14 PM, Aleksandr Mashchenko wrote:
> >> If we are fine with suppor
On 1/13/2019 4:14 PM, Aleksandr Mashchenko wrote:
>> If we are fine with supporting 2.5.x branch for a bit longer than a
> year
>
> I'm fine with that.
Me too. Security and bug fixes don't look like a burden for me even for
several years. And I found Struts, mature, so any structural breaking
h
@Nathan
> We are in the middle of a 2.3 -> 2.5 conversion now, would hate to do
it again.
Can you elaborate on why it was difficult to migrate (if it was :) )?
Have you followed migration guide [1]? It is pretty straightforward.
As for the java version I would suggest using java 8, 2.5.x runs
niedz., 13 sty 2019 o 09:44 Yasser Zamani napisał(a):
> By `support`, did you mean security and bug fixes? If so, AFAIK, it's obvious
> that 2.5.x will receive them in a long term - several years as long as
> technically possible (@dev please correct me if it's not true). But if you
> meant new
espite the java version, I personally experienced it too
hard, buggy and boring to manipulate and then support both branches (2.5 and
2.6) for new features.
Regards.
>-Original Message-
>From: Nathan Bragg
>Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2019 7:05 PM
>To: dev@struts.apache.org
>
Only if support for 2.5 lasts for awhile longer. We are in the middle of a 2.3
-> 2.5 conversion now, would hate to do it again.
On 2019/01/11 20:35:42, Aleksandr Mashchenko wrote:
> We discussed it before but it was quite some time ago. How about >
> upgrading to jdk8 in 2.6 version?>
>
> -
Only if support for 2.5 lasts for awhile longer. We are in the middle of a 2.3
-> 2.5 conversion now, would hate to do it again.
On 2019/01/11 20:35:42, Aleksandr Mashchenko wrote:
> We discussed it before but it was quite some time ago. How about >
> upgrading to jdk8 in 2.6 version?>
>
> -
> having to write a single line of multithread code.>
> www.oracle.com>
>
>
> +1>
> Martin>
> >
> From: i...@flyingfischer.ch >
> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2019 4:23 AM>
> To: dev@struts.apache.org>
> Subject: Re:
I vote for Java 8 as well. I already have clients moving to OpenJDK 11 and
are looking at all suppliers to upgrade their products.
Any of the underlying libraries (asm?) that have many versions ahead of the
current ones in Struts could also be brought up as part of 2.6
Louis
On Sat, Jan 12, 2
pt., 11 sty 2019 o 21:36 Aleksandr Mashchenko
napisał(a):
>
> We discussed it before but it was quite some time ago. How about
> upgrading to jdk8 in 2.6 version?
>
> - Java versions are now released more frequently
> - 2.5.x will still be on jdk7
> - Currently custom converters must be created to
Furthermore, streams can leverage multi-core architectures without you having
to write a single line of multithread code.
www.oracle.com
+1
Martin
From: i...@flyingfischer.ch
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2019 4:23 AM
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Subject: Re: jdk8 in 2.6
+1
Markus
Am 11.01.19 um 21:35 schrieb Aleksandr Mashchenko:
> We discussed it before but it was quite some time ago. How about
> upgrading to jdk8 in 2.6 version?
>
> - Java versions are now released more frequently
> - 2.5.x will still be on jdk7
> - Currently custom converters must be created
++1
Kind Regards.
>-Original Message-
>From: Aleksandr Mashchenko
>Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2019 12:06 AM
>To: dev@struts.apache.org
>Subject: jdk8 in 2.6
>
>We discussed it before but it was quite some time ago. How about upgrading to
>jdk8 in 2.6 version?
>
>- Java versions are now
13 matches
Mail list logo
