RE: struts-faces target which v of struts

2004-06-02 Thread Joe Germuska
Since there are no existing struts-faces users, I don't think we should make our lives difficult or boring :^) I should clarify "since there are no existing users of a released version of struts-faces..." Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog.germuska.com "In fact,

RE: struts-faces target which v of struts

2004-06-02 Thread Joe Germuska
I see no reason why struts-faces shouldn't track the development of Struts. It should always build against CVS HEAD and the same dependencies. Maybe at some point in the future we'd need a "maintenance" branch of struts-faces, but I don't think enough people use it yet for us to get hung up o

RE: struts-faces target which v of struts

2004-06-02 Thread Michael Rasmussen
I am wondering if the reason that this post has not been answered is because nobody really knows the answer. Is that the case? is there no "roadmap" for struts faces? I can't seem to find one anywhere. I think you assign too much formality to struts-faces. Craig is super busy, and he is the

RE: struts-faces target which v of struts

2004-06-02 Thread Joe Germuska
At 2:16 PM + 6/2/04, Michael Rasmussen wrote: I am wondering if the reason that this post has not been answered is because nobody really knows the answer. Is that the case? is there no "roadmap" for struts faces? I can't seem to find one anywhere. I think you assign too much formality to

RE: struts-faces target which v of struts

2004-06-02 Thread Michael Rasmussen
I am wondering if the reason that this post has not been answered is because nobody really knows the answer. Is that the case? is there no "roadmap" for struts faces? I can't seem to find one anywhere. From: "Michael Rasmussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL