All the POM files in HEAD have been updated to 1.4.0-SNAPSHOT
If you want to work on Struts 1.3, check out the STRUTS_1_3_BRANCH
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
There are STRUTS_1_3_BRANCH and trunk now. What does trunk represent?
1.4? Or something else?
On 2/8/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
There are STRUTS_1_3_BRANCH and trunk now. What does trunk represent?
1.4? Or something else?
On 2/8/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Struts 1.3 has been branched:
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=505116
> Added:
> struts/struts1/branches/STRUTS_1_3_BRANCH/
>
Struts 1.3 has been branched:
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=505116
> Added:
> struts/struts1/branches/STRUTS_1_3_BRANCH/
> - copied from r505115, struts/struts1/trunk/
Please do 1.3.x maintenance and production support on this branch. I or
somebody else will be upda
I am OK with branching. Not that I really need it right now, but it
does not hurt, should be helpful. +0 from me.
On 2/8/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think just go ahead and create the branch. Tags/Branches in svn are
cheap and if anyone doesn't like it can always be re-done/
+1.
On 2/8/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think just go ahead and create the branch. Tags/Branches in svn are
cheap and if anyone doesn't like it can always be re-done/reversed.
Niall
On 2/7/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to do this for the 1.x line a
I think just go ahead and create the branch. Tags/Branches in svn are
cheap and if anyone doesn't like it can always be re-done/reversed.
Niall
On 2/7/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to do this for the 1.x line as well. I want to push out a new
1.3.7 with a few tiny patche
