s of supporting, matured code with a smaller footprint in
a short period of time.
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 fra
--- Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My main driver for doing the updates was to update the S2.1 code to bring
> it inline with the latest version, but perhaps we should put our hands up
and
> admit that S2's focus is not on Ajax UI widgets
Nobody has yet provided any information as to the
Martin Cooper wrote:
On the other hand, creating the project in the Struts sandbox means that it
is immediately open to any Struts committer, all of the resources are
already set up, and getting a release out is dependent only upon a vote to
move the code from the sandbox to the main code li
ED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 3:16 AM
Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Jeromy Evans <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Agreed. The Dojo 0.43 plugin in Struts2.1.1 contains significant
improv
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeromy Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 5:56 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
>
>
> I've concluded that tag libraries for rich client fram
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Jeromy Evans <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. The Dojo 0.43 plugin in Struts2.1.1 contains significant
> improvements over the Dojo 0.40 tags bundled in 2.0.x. It's worth releasing
> as-is and I'd give it a +1 today.
>
> It sounds like there's enough people i
Dave Newton wrote:
Nutshell: what's anybody's take on the effort this would require, and who's
available to make that effort?
I share similar sentiment and at most will just be able to convert my
existing 2.1.1 test applications over to use the Dojo 1.x plugin to
investigate the conseque
Agreed. The Dojo 0.43 plugin in Struts2.1.1 contains significant
improvements over the Dojo 0.40 tags bundled in 2.0.x. It's worth
releasing as-is and I'd give it a +1 today.
It sounds like there's enough people interested to complete a Dojo 1.x
plugin. I also think it's worth creating a go
I don't think we should wait at all. Refactoring dojo out of core was
one of the main things for 2.1 and it's been there for a year already.
Unless Dojo 1.0 is a lot, way, way better than the older versions, I
would say you will find lots of surprises. IMO you should set it up as
a project on googl
--- Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whilst I can see that there is an advantage to getting a 2.1 release out,
> my question would be do we want it to go out with a (very) old version
> of dojo as the demonstration of it's modern ajax capabilities?, and do
> we want to put developers throug
to 0.4 as the bundled version and then
jump to a much newer version as a minor version release?
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Rainer Hermanns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 4:22 PM
Subject: RE: Dojo plugi
struts after you've
done the replacement.
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 4:09 PM
Subject: RE: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
-Original Message-
n continue with the development of S2.1.x.
What do you think?
cheers,
Rainer
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Al Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 12:44 AM
>> To: Struts Developers List
>> Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1
> -Original Message-
> From: Al Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 12:44 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
>
> All of the bits are left in place so that the source can be
> re
bugs,
but at least we now starting the move :).
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Musachy Barroso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 3:18 AM
Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
How deep ar
ress.
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Pedro Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 1:47 AM
Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
This point is clear to me,but ,why don´t you leave a only the jar available
instead the all structur
re bugs will be
discovered as people thrash it.
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 1:03 AM
Subject: RE: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
How deep are the clie
You can do, I'm keeping it on my system atm, so I'm happy to co-ordinate
changes.
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 11:32 PM
Subject: RE: Dojo plugin
> How deep are the client-side tests for the Dojo components? My impression was
> that a fair amount had changed moving from Dojo 0.4mumble -> 1.0.
>
Pretty much the whole thing changed, as far as I know.
musachy
-
To unsubscri
t people to confuse it with the official S2.1 dojo plugin.
>
> Al.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Pedro Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 2:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framew
How deep are the client-side tests for the Dojo components? My impression was
that a fair amount had changed moving from Dojo 0.4mumble -> 1.0.
I don't know the nature of all the changes that were made, but it makes me
nervous. Musachy might have a better handle on this.
Dave
--- "Karr, David" <
Is it appropriate at this point to submit a bug for this, and provide a
patch for your changes?
> -Original Message-
> From: Al Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 11:18 PM
> To: dev@struts.apache.org
> Subject: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
>
>
It's a download URL for a zip file, not a maven repository.
I don't want people to confuse it with the official S2.1 dojo plugin.
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Pedro Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: Dojo
is the source correct (http://www.alsutton.com/dojo_1_1_0_for_2_1_1.zip);
I cant execute mvn package command.
-
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.FileNotFoundException:
C:\Temp\struts_dojo1.1\dojo\..\..\core\src\site\resources\tags\ajax\a.html
Herrera
Al Sutton wrote:
>
Thanks Al - We(& Others I know) are waiting for it quite a long time
since we believe that Struts 2 with Dojo 1.X
are very good choice from architecture prespective.
1 note -
We started working with Dojo 1.0 for few months with Struts 2 - (We had
minimal conversion of some of the tags we used)
Fr
good job. I´ve started a new project and I´m going to test your plugin for
now. I were waiting for this improve for a long time.
Thanks
Herrera
Al Sutton wrote:
>
> [I'm posing this via nabble because the apache mail servers are saying my
> last 3 attempts to send this via my normal mailbox
26 matches
Mail list logo
