Re: Jar clash in the maven build

2008-01-21 Thread Al Sutton
uot;Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 4:54 PM Subject: Re: Jar clash in the maven build On Jan 20, 2008 3:03 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just to make things more interesting we have entere

Re: Jar clash in the maven build

2008-01-20 Thread Al Sutton
unday, January 20, 2008 4:54 PM Subject: Re: Jar clash in the maven build On Jan 20, 2008 3:03 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just to make things more interesting we have entered jar hell :(. Maven is picking up struts-annotations which has a freemarker-2.3.4 dependency and inser

Re: Jar clash in the maven build

2008-01-20 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Jan 20, 2008 3:03 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just to make things more interesting we have entered jar hell :(. > > Maven is picking up struts-annotations which has a freemarker-2.3.4 > dependency and inserting it into the classpath before the S2.1 specified > 2.3.11 dependency th

Re: Jar clash in the maven build

2008-01-20 Thread James Mitchell
Well, that's not exactly what will happen. Core pulls in freemarker 2.3.11, but labels annotations as optional, which means it will not include 2.3.4 (through transitive dependence). But regardless, you are right, they need to be the same. On Jan 20, 2008 5:03 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>