Re: Mailreader 2.0

2005-11-04 Thread Sean Schofield
> On my list is to test it with 1.1.1 (just released), and to update the > dependency information if that actually works. I'm not planning on trying to > keep up with nightly build changes in MyFaces; just the releases they test > for compatibility with the JSF TCK. Speaking of which I need to pub

Re: Mailreader 2.0

2005-11-03 Thread Craig McClanahan
Thanks for working on this! More below. On 11/3/05, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, I've done the minimal necessary changes to make the shale > mailreader app work (except for 1 thing). I can't seem to figure out > why the edit/delete buttons on a subscription don't work. When >

Re: Mailreader 2.0

2005-11-03 Thread James Mitchell
I don't remember the exact reason. Plus, the latest won't be on ibiblio, so the download-dependencies won't work, unless we point it to where the myfaces nightlies are published. No big deal though, it works with MyFaces 1.1.0, and I'll likely focus future efforts on new stuff. -- James

Re: Mailreader 2.0

2005-11-03 Thread Sean Schofield
> FYI - Shale Mailreader does not work with MyFaces HEAD, you have to > use 1.1.0 (or a compatible release). What's the problem with HEAD? > James Mitchell sean - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional command

Re: Mailreader 2.0

2005-11-03 Thread James Mitchell
Ok, I've done the minimal necessary changes to make the shale mailreader app work (except for 1 thing). I can't seem to figure out why the edit/delete buttons on a subscription don't work. When either is pressed The page simply returns back to the same page and re-renders that same (minus

Re: Mailreader 2.0

2005-11-01 Thread Sean Schofield
[snip] > A larger scale demo app that really showed off Shale would be very useful as > well. It wouldn't *have* to be MailReader 2.0 ... it could be something new > (after all these years :-). Such an app would need to cover enough > functionality areas to show off Dialogs and the application lev

Re: Mailreader 2.0

2005-11-01 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 11/1/05, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can't find my changes to the mailreader app that makes it > compatible with mailreader-dao, so I'd have to start over, which I > really don't mind doing, but what do you think about a Mailreader 2.0? That may well be appropriate ... but

Re: Mailreader 2.0

2005-11-01 Thread Ted Husted
How about a MailReader 1.3 for now? :) I think we should definately use MailReader as a small best practices demonstration of Shale as well as Core. Steve uploaded the CookBook to Apps, so we don't need to stretch the example anymore. I believe we should write the MailReader the way we write our