rg
> Subject: RE: [struts-dev] Re: Move deprecated plugins to archive
> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:36:24 -0400
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dave Newton [mailto:davelnew...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 20:25
> > To: Struts Developers L
On Jul 18, 2011 2:34 PM, "Jason Pyeron" wrote:
> > IMO it's borderline negligent to be shipping such an old
> > version of Dojo anyway.
> >
> > Hey Martin, perhaps you'll donate an updated version of the
> > Dojo tags and maintain them--those seemed to be the sticking
> > points when we made the de
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Newton [mailto:davelnew...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 20:25
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: [struts-dev] Re: Move deprecated plugins to archive
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Dale Newfield
> wrote:
Martin, of course you are right.
In the next days I will go to move the two deprecated plugins (codebehind
and dojo)
to the archive.
What happens with the Wiki Pages?
Johannes
-
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
--
View this message in context:
http://struts.1
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Johannes Geppert wrote:
> What about further development as a plugin outside of the Struts Project?
> We can create a project at Google Code or Github like the jQuery Plugin.
Who is "we"? If "we" is a group of Struts committers, why would "we"
take the code somewh
We had discussed that as well at one point; there was some pushback. I
don't have a problem with it, and I don't recall off the top of my
head what the issue(s) were.
Dave
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Johannes Geppert wrote:
> What about further development as a plugin outside of the Struts
What about further development as a plugin outside of the Struts Project?
We can create a project at Google Code or Github like the jQuery Plugin.
Johannes
-
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
--
View this message in context:
http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/M
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Dale Newfield wrote:
> On 6/27/11 10:09 AM, Martin Gainty wrote:
>> I vote leave dojo as un-deprecated
> Too late. It's been deprecated since the first 2.1 release, and that
> conversation happened nearly 3 ago:
> http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-Depre
On 6/27/11 10:09 AM, Martin Gainty wrote:
I vote leave dojo as un-deprecated
Too late. It's been deprecated since the first 2.1 release, and that
conversation happened nearly 3 ago:
http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-Deprecate-or-remove-Dojo-plugin-td3535027.html
This conversatio
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> Do we need a Vote for that as well ?
Good question. As far as I recall, and as far as I can determine,
previous moves to the archive have been by lazy consensus. Thus as
long as nobody's objecting here, we can go ahead and do the same
thing.
Do we need a Vote for that as well ?
Kind regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
2011/6/27 Dale Newfield :
> On 6/27/11 9:02 AM, Johannes Geppert wrote:
>>
>> What you all think about moving deprecated plugins to ar
On 6/27/11 9:02 AM, Johannes Geppert wrote:
What you all think about moving deprecated plugins to archive for the 2.3
release?
And the Dojo plugin...
-Dale
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For addit
And Dojo, if it isn't already moved.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Johannes Geppert wrote:
> What you all think about moving deprecated plugins to archive for the 2.3
> release?
> I think especially the codebehind plugin confuses the user and should be
> moved
> to the archive.
>
> Johannes
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
