Hi Christian,
We also started looking at creating custom for YUI while it was still in its
heyday (https://cwiki.apache.org/S2PLUGINS/yui-plugin.html).
I encountered several significant problems creating struts2 tags that attempt
to abstract the details of client-side frameworks away:
- you e
This has several reasons. First I start this project as a non Struts
Committer
and second this plugin produce high support and user mailing list traffic.
Some devlopers was in fear to have the same trouble like with the dojo
plugin.
Johannes
Christian Grobmeier wrote
>
> May I ask you why you
2012/1/28 Christian Grobmeier :
> May I ask you why you didn't develop this at the struts repos? With
> dojo tags going away struts2-jQuery is a very strong replacement.
> Would be cool to see this somewhere more prominent on the struts page.
> I must say, I have either missed it or left it out bec
Great examples. I will look into it.
May I ask you why you didn't develop this at the struts repos? With
dojo tags going away struts2-jQuery is a very strong replacement.
Would be cool to see this somewhere more prominent on the struts page.
I must say, I have either missed it or left it out becau
That's exactly what I try to do with the Struts2 jQuery Plugin.
http://code.google.com/p/struts2-jquery/
http://code.google.com/p/struts2-jquery/
Take a look at the Showcases to see which Components are already supported.
http://www.weinfreund.de/struts2-jquery-showcase/index.action
http://www
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Dave Newton wrote:
> Those are Dojo tags, not jquery tags. Same difference--they make Ajax calls
> to Struts actions. Isn't that what you said you wanted?
well, in a way, yes. This would be the start of it. I thought more on
complete forms, build as a js component
Those are Dojo tags, not jquery tags. Same difference--they make Ajax calls
to Struts actions. Isn't that what you said you wanted?
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> you mean the tags listed here?
> http://struts.apache.org/2.3.1.2/docs/tag-reference.html
>
> The are l
you mean the tags listed here?
http://struts.apache.org/2.3.1.2/docs/tag-reference.html
The are listing this btw too:
http://struts.apache.org/2.3.1.2/docs/dojo-div.html
which is pointing to the dojo plugin somehow
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Dave Newton wrote:
> That's what the jQuery tags
That's what the jQuery tags do.
Dave
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> thanks for all your insights and sharing the "old stories". It was not
> my intention to make S2 to some kind of Wicket-Clone. Now, after I
> have thought a bit more about what I w
Hello folks,
thanks for all your insights and sharing the "old stories". It was not
my intention to make S2 to some kind of Wicket-Clone. Now, after I
have thought a bit more about what I wanted to gain, I think the
"components" I speak of are more or less components like we already
have with S2 t
I agree to Martin, there are enough Component Frameworks available.
That's one point I personally like on Struts2, that all view Logic is in
my JSP/Fremarker/Velocity Template. I know Wicket Apps which have really
nice
and clear looking HTML Files, but the Java Files are bloated and looks dirty
ha
Hi,
After Martin's words, there is nothing to say. Adding components to S2
isn't a good option, S2 should remain as action base framework. If you
want components you have a lot of options - Wicket, JSF, Tapestry,
etc.
Kind regards
--
Łukasz
-
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Last mail for today :-)
>
> Today there is a discussion on going, Tapestry vs Struts (on
> tapestry-users list). Of course people are convinced of Tapestry, and
> actually it is a great framework with huge benefits. And it is pretty
> m
13 matches
Mail list logo
