Re: Struts 2.1 plans

2008-12-23 Thread matt.payne
Never mind sorry. I see xwork 2.1.2 is in released form. I had to change our pom from point at the snapshot. Matt matt.payne wrote: > > This just broke our Struts 2.1.3 in maven. > > on line 99 of struts-default.xml > com.opensymphony.xwork2.DefaultUnknownHandlerManager > > This class doe

Re: Struts 2.1 plans

2008-12-23 Thread Musachy Barroso
update and build xwork, or update /pom.xml. musachy On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:47 PM, matt.payne wrote: > > This just broke our Struts 2.1.3 in maven. > > on line 99 of struts-default.xml > com.opensymphony.xwork2.DefaultUnknownHandlerManager > > This class does not exist in xwork (maven). Pleas

Re: Struts 2.1 plans

2008-12-23 Thread matt.payne
This just broke our Struts 2.1.3 in maven. on line 99 of struts-default.xml com.opensymphony.xwork2.DefaultUnknownHandlerManager This class does not exist in xwork (maven). Please introduce a new xwork jar before releasing this change to struts. Anyway this can be fixed soon? Matthew Payne

Re: Struts 2.1 plans

2008-12-03 Thread Musachy Barroso
> > Oh! Multiple UnknownHandler = Convention in 2.1.3 right? If only. > Yes...still pushing for it :) musachy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Struts 2.1 plans

2008-12-03 Thread dusty
Oh! Multiple UnknownHandler = Convention in 2.1.3 right? If only. Musachy Barroso wrote: > > Ah, cool, I assumed you were backed up. Is the 2.1.3 filter up to date > in xwork? I will take a look and see which ones I can fix. When you > have a chance take another look at > http://jira

Re: Struts 2.1 plans

2008-12-02 Thread Rene Gielen
Yeah guys, let's roll... I think we sould stick our heads together with Rainer to get a hands on XWork release tutorial :) For the S2 release, we might still have some small pain points with the documentation, doing a release together will help to get it in best possible shape. Cheers, - Re

Re: Struts 2.1 plans

2008-12-02 Thread Musachy Barroso
Ah, cool, I assumed you were backed up. Is the 2.1.3 filter up to date in xwork? I will take a look and see which ones I can fix. When you have a chance take another look at http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-640 (yeah I am really annoying :) ), and if it looks good I can commit it. regards mu

Re: Struts 2.1 plans

2008-12-02 Thread Rainer Hermanns
Musachy, I'm available for releases as well (especially XWork) and soon will have more spare time I'd like to spent on xw/s2. cheers, Rainer On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:12:39 -0500, "Musachy Barroso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to fix the problem with the empty spaces in the param names, > a

Re: Struts 2.1 plans

2008-12-02 Thread Musachy Barroso
I want to fix the problem with the empty spaces in the param names, and then head to xwork and see if there are any blocking bugs open, and try to help there. I am trying to get Rene to do the xwork release, and me and Wes will step thru the Struts release, so there is more people involved with the

Re: Struts 2.1 plans

2008-12-02 Thread James Holmes
Yes, see the Struts home page for the following info: = The latest release of Struts 2 is Struts 2.1.2, which was promoted to "Beta" on 26 March 2008. For the latest production release ("General Availability"), see Struts 2.0.14. = On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Wes Wannemacher <[EMAIL

Re: Struts 2.1 plans

2008-12-02 Thread Wes Wannemacher
Was 2.1.2 a BETA? -Wes On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:53 AM, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like we're almost there! Musachy is killing it! > > From what I can tell the only real outstanding issue left for the 2.1.3 > release is: > > https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2197 >