I would like to officially announce EOL of Struts 2.5.x, any objections?
https://struts.apache.org/announce-2023#a20231030
niedz., 8 paź 2023 o 17:29 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
>
> śr., 4 paź 2023 o 08:40 napisał(a):
> > for my taste it's too short - the last EOL Announcement (2.3) was over a
>
śr., 4 paź 2023 o 08:40 napisał(a):
> for my taste it's too short - the last EOL Announcement (2.3) was over a
> half year.
That's why I posted this question, 6 months is fair enough :)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
śr., 4 paź 2023 o 09:09 Greg Huber napisał(a):
>
> +1.
>
> If we are going to create a plugin for the Jakarta changes, would
> make it easier.
It's not the case ... many other libs like commons-fileupload or
sitemesh3 based directly on JakartaEE - I already posted another topic
how to move to
Spring 5 Framework has an EOL of 2024-12-31, and 6 is Java 17+.
* Spring Framework 6.1.x: Jakarta EE 9-11 (jakarta namespace)
* Spring Framework 6.0.x: Jakarta EE 9-10 (jakarta namespace)
* Spring Framework 5.3.x: Java EE 7-8 (javax namespace)
On 04/10/2023 05:32, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
Hi,
+1.
If we are going to create a plugin for the Jakarta changes, would
make it easier.
On 04/10/2023 05:32, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
Hi,
I would like to announce that we end support for Struts 2.5.x branch.
Is setting this date to the 1st of the new year ok? Not too short a
period of time?
I am working on `Threads get blocked due to unnecessary synchronization
in OgnlRuntime`. Strangely, `execute` method is locked some where else,
so `OgnlRuntime` blocks for it!
On 7/18/2017 10:24 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a few issues registered that pop up after releasing 2.5.1
2017-07-18 8:29 GMT+02:00 i...@flyingfischer.ch :
> I didn't want to open an "issue" in Jira, since I do not know, if it is
> worth considering upgrading Commons-IO:
>
> Commons-IO has version 2.5 with quite a lot of bug corrections. No
> mention of vulnis fixed though. Binary, source and semantic
Am 18.07.2017 um 07:54 schrieb Lukasz Lenart:
> Hi,
>
> There is a few issues registered that pop up after releasing 2.5.12, I
> would like to fix them and push out an another version of 2.5.x
> branch.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/WW/versions/12341116
>
>
> Regards
I didn't want to
A lot of parenthesis :)
Great, thanks!
---
Regards,
Aleksandr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
2016-05-06 11:58 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> 2016-05-06 11:55 GMT+02:00 Aleksandr Mashchenko :
2016-05-06 10:19 GMT+02:00 Aleksandr Mashchenko :
Some strange issue here with 2.5.
Required labels are shown on both sides of the label. Seems like both
if-s
in xhtml control
2016-05-06 11:55 GMT+02:00 Aleksandr Mashchenko :
>>>2016-05-06 10:19 GMT+02:00 Aleksandr Mashchenko :
>>> Some strange issue here with 2.5.
>>>
>>> Required labels are shown on both sides of the label. Seems like both
>>> if-s
>>> in xhtml controlheader-core.ftl evaluate to true.
>>>
>>>
>>> https
>>2016-05-06 10:19 GMT+02:00 Aleksandr Mashchenko :
>> Some strange issue here with 2.5.
>>
>> Required labels are shown on both sides of the label. Seems like
both if-s
>> in xhtml controlheader-core.ftl evaluate to true.
>>
>>
https://github.com/apache/struts/blob/master/core/src/main/resourc
2016-05-06 10:19 GMT+02:00 Aleksandr Mashchenko :
> Some strange issue here with 2.5.
>
> Required labels are shown on both sides of the label. Seems like both if-s
> in xhtml controlheader-core.ftl evaluate to true.
>
> https://github.com/apache/struts/blob/master/core/src/main/resources/template/
Working on BETA3
2016-01-19 16:02 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> I see no objections, starting with BETA3
>
> 2016-01-18 15:58 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart :
>> If no objections I am going prepare BETA3 release
>>
>> 2016-01-11 14:53 GMT+01:00 Christoph Nenning :
@Christoph I was able to resolve the
I see no objections, starting with BETA3
2016-01-18 15:58 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> If no objections I am going prepare BETA3 release
>
> 2016-01-11 14:53 GMT+01:00 Christoph Nenning :
>>> @Christoph I was able to resolve the issue with that warning about
>>> Custom EL ... also fixed the problem
If no objections I am going prepare BETA3 release
2016-01-11 14:53 GMT+01:00 Christoph Nenning :
>> @Christoph I was able to resolve the issue with that warning about
>> Custom EL ... also fixed the problem with loading ftl layouts - you
>> must define a proper templateType ->
>> https://github.co
> @Christoph I was able to resolve the issue with that warning about
> Custom EL ... also fixed the problem with loading ftl layouts - you
> must define a proper templateType ->
> https://github.com/lukaszlenart/struts2-tiles-demo/commit/
> dc52bc82895dc664ff0db0bb8ca330a13e48c169
> - I will add th
@Christoph I was able to resolve the issue with that warning about
Custom EL ... also fixed the problem with loading ftl layouts - you
must define a proper templateType ->
https://github.com/lukaszlenart/struts2-tiles-demo/commit/dc52bc82895dc664ff0db0bb8ca330a13e48c169
- I will add this to docs an
> >> Wait! My Tiles PR targets 2.3.25 not 2.5 :) I was planning do the
same
> >> for 2.5 - drop support for Tiles 2 and use Tiles 3 only
> >>
> >
> > Oh yes, I remembered. So it is more work to get done for 2.5.
> >
> > Do you want to do BETA3 before?
> > I'm fine with that.
>
> I thought about p
2016-01-07 13:43 GMT+01:00 Christoph Nenning :
>> Wait! My Tiles PR targets 2.3.25 not 2.5 :) I was planning do the same
>> for 2.5 - drop support for Tiles 2 and use Tiles 3 only
>>
>
> Oh yes, I remembered. So it is more work to get done for 2.5.
>
> Do you want to do BETA3 before?
> I'm fine wit
> Wait! My Tiles PR targets 2.3.25 not 2.5 :) I was planning do the same
> for 2.5 - drop support for Tiles 2 and use Tiles 3 only
>
Oh yes, I remembered. So it is more work to get done for 2.5.
Do you want to do BETA3 before?
I'm fine with that.
Regards,
Christoph
This Email was scanned by S
Wait! My Tiles PR targets 2.3.25 not 2.5 :) I was planning do the same
for 2.5 - drop support for Tiles 2 and use Tiles 3 only
2016-01-05 20:01 GMT+01:00 Aleksandr Mashchenko :
> +1 for merging tiles PR
>
> Regards,
> Aleksandr
>
>
>
+1 for merging tiles PR
Regards,
Aleksandr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
2016-01-05 13:59 GMT+01:00 Christoph Nenning :
> I would merge the tiles PR before BETA3. But basically: +1
Yeah, it would be nice
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsu
2016-01-05 9:37 GMT+01:00 Greg Huber :
> Beta 2 did not work for me due to the dmi changes, was this ever resolved?
>
>
> Cheers Greg.
>
> from a previous email:
>
>
> On 30 September 2015 at 09:46, Lukasz Lenart
> wrote:
> 2015-09-30 10:43 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber :
>> Here is my abbreviated structur
> Hi,
>
> I think it's time to release the BETA3 and start thinking about a
> normal release. We have over 30 issues resolved from the BETA2.
>
>
I would merge the tiles PR before BETA3. But basically: +1
Regards,
Christoph
This Email was scanned by Sophos Anti Virus
Beta 2 did not work for me due to the dmi changes, was this ever resolved?
Cheers Greg.
from a previous email:
On 30 September 2015 at 09:46, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
2015-09-30 10:43 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber :
> Here is my abbreviated structure:
>
>
> ..
>
>
>
> ..
>class="org.events.ui.strut
+1 for new BETA release.
Looking forward to see the first normal release. :-)
Best Regards
Johannes
#
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
2016-01-05 9:06 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> Hi,
>
> I think it's time to releas
I love votes to start a vote!
Cheers,
Paul
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Johannes Geppert wrote:
> +1 for starting the vote.
>
> Johannes
> Am 27.07.2015 08:06 schrieb "Lukasz Lenart" :
>
> > 2015-07-24 21:49 GMT+02:00 Johannes Geppert :
> > > Is there a reason why we don't publish the java
+1 for starting the vote.
Johannes
Am 27.07.2015 08:06 schrieb "Lukasz Lenart" :
> 2015-07-24 21:49 GMT+02:00 Johannes Geppert :
> > Is there a reason why we don't publish the javadocs?
> > I just refactored the javadocs a bit and some of them contains may
> usefully
> > information's for develop
+1, good job!
Cheers Greg.
On 27 July 2015 at 07:05, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> 2015-07-24 21:49 GMT+02:00 Johannes Geppert :
> > Is there a reason why we don't publish the javadocs?
> > I just refactored the javadocs a bit and some of them contains may
> usefully
> > information's for developers.
2015-07-24 21:49 GMT+02:00 Johannes Geppert :
> Is there a reason why we don't publish the javadocs?
> I just refactored the javadocs a bit and some of them contains may usefully
> information's for developers.
> May it would be great to give the search engines a chance to crawl that
> content.
As
Is there a reason why we don't publish the javadocs?
I just refactored the javadocs a bit and some of them contains may usefully
information's for developers.
May it would be great to give the search engines a chance to crawl that
content.
Johannes
2015-07-20 16:41 GMT+02:00 Paul Benedict :
> Thanks!! Wasn't there talk to move com.opensymphony.xwork2 into
> org.apache.struts.xwork? Or is that a 3.0 deal?
It'll be in 3.0 :)
but I fought about dropping XWork name and merge everything into
o.a.struts3 package
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323
Thanks!! Wasn't there talk to move com.opensymphony.xwork2 into
org.apache.struts.xwork? Or is that a 3.0 deal?
Cheers,
Paul
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Johannes Geppert wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> here you can find the latest java doc versions.
> But I think until the first release there are
I didn't publish any docs on-line, you can fetch them as a part of the release
2015-07-19 3:03 GMT+02:00 Paul Benedict :
> Do we have any published 2.5 javadocs?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Lukasz Lenart
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please take a time and test the bits -
Hi Paul,
here you can find the latest java doc versions.
But I think until the first release there are no published java docs
available.
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/struts/struts2-core/2.5-SNAPSHOT/
Johannes
###
Do we have any published 2.5 javadocs?
Cheers,
Paul
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please take a time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please
> report any problems back. I'll call for vote in a week if no problems
> will be spotted.
>
> Staging Mave
2014-09-19 17:02 GMT+02:00 Paul Benedict :
> Lots of work to write a line?
yeah, I know, just yielding ;-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apac
Lots of work to write a line?
Cheers,
Paul
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2014-09-19 16:50 GMT+02:00 Paul Benedict :
> > Well... we can also bind the plugin to the appropriate minimum version of
> > Struts. That shouldn't be hard to do. Either the plugin specifies what
2014-09-19 16:50 GMT+02:00 Paul Benedict :
> Well... we can also bind the plugin to the appropriate minimum version of
> Struts. That shouldn't be hard to do. Either the plugin specifies what it
> needs in the MANIFEST who the plugin class has an annotation with the
> version range.
Good idea, but
Well... we can also bind the plugin to the appropriate minimum version of
Struts. That shouldn't be hard to do. Either the plugin specifies what it
needs in the MANIFEST who the plugin class has an annotation with the
version range.
PS: Documentation has nothing to do with Maven :-) You should doc
2014-09-18 16:03 GMT+02:00 Paul Benedict :
> You do it just like Maven does it. You document it. :-)
Problem is with guys that don't use Maven...
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e
You do it just like Maven does it. You document it. :-)
Cheers,
Paul
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2014-09-17 16:25 GMT+02:00 Paul Benedict :
> > PS: When 3.0 comes around, I recommend we split off all plugins into
> > independent release cycles like Maven plugins. Th
2014-09-18 11:59 GMT+02:00 Johannes Geppert :
> At the time when we are using SVN I was moving already a plugin to archive.
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/archive/plugins/
>
> May struts-archive would be also a good name.
Hmm... right
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenar
At the time when we are using SVN I was moving already a plugin to archive.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/archive/plugins/
May struts-archive would be also a good name.
Best Regards
Johannes
#
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://
2014-09-18 11:00 GMT+02:00 :
> I would call it struts-legacy, already in struts1 such a project exists.
good idea +1
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@strut
I would call it struts-legacy, already in struts1 such a project exists.
Regards
Ing. Michael Hintenaus
silbergrau Consulting & Software GmbH
http://www.silbergrau.com
> Am 18.09.2014 um 10:29 schrieb "Lukasz Lenart" :
>
> Moving deprecated plugins to struts-extras project is just idea to
> giv
2014-09-17 16:25 GMT+02:00 Paul Benedict :
> PS: When 3.0 comes around, I recommend we split off all plugins into
> independent release cycles like Maven plugins. This way we can evolve and
> deprecate them independently without waiting for core releases.
I have just one doubt: keeping plugins in
Moving deprecated plugins to struts-extras project is just idea to
give people option to contribute via GitHub - I know that know
everyone can do the same, but I think people really don't understand
that.
Or instead struts-extras it can be named struts-deprecated - anyway we
won't throw it away bu
> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:20:31 -0400
> Subject: Re: Struts 2.5
> From: davelnew...@gmail.com
> To: dev@struts.apache.org
>
> I'm not excited about keeping the deprecated plugins around; IMO it implies
> support.
>
> People still ask questions about t
If you move them into a separate module for 2.5, just don't include it in
the parent's build process (include it only as a special Maven profile).
It's someone is a die-hard hacker and wants to build it themselves, they
can.
PS: When 3.0 comes around, I recommend we split off all plugins into
inde
I'm not excited about keeping the deprecated plugins around; IMO it implies
support.
People still ask questions about the Dojo plugin on Stack Overflow, running
in S2.3. The plugin must die.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Paul Benedict
wrote:
> Ah, struts-extras... how time comes full circle
Ah, struts-extras... how time comes full circle. Struts 1 had its extra
package too:
http://struts.apache.org/development/1.x/struts-extras/
What does creating the new project buy us? or an end-user? Just curious.
Not criticizing; just wanting to learn your plan.
Cheers,
Paul
On Wed, Sep 17, 20
One more idea: instead of dropping deprecated plugins, move them into
a new project ie. struts-extras, so the Struts project will consist
of:
- struts-framework
- struts-examples
- struts-apps
- struts-archetypes
- struts-extras
- struts-website (on SVN)
As far I can recall there was discussion ab
55 matches
Mail list logo
