Re: URL validation and capitals

2016-07-28 12:48 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > Ok, forgot about this one, WW-4671 > Me never forget ;-) > May be it would be easier to lowercase the url to start rather than change > the rather complex regex ? It's just a matter of using Pattern.CASE_I

Re: URL validation and capitals

Ok, forgot about this one, WW-4671 May be it would be easier to lowercase the url to start rather than change the rather complex regex ? Cheers. On 28 July 2016 at 10:47, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2016-05-09 8:38 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > > A while

Re: URL validation and capitals

2016-05-09 8:38 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > A while back I though I read a fix on capitals on the url validator. It > now seems to be blacking them again. > > http://www.appache.org/TEST > > I do have some URL's with capitals so it might have worked at some time? Yeah, looks like the RegEx check is

Re: URL validation

Url validation is part of Commons Validator rather than Struts so it might be more appropriate to raise it there. Also, this is subject to an outstanding bug: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30686 Niall - Original Message - From: "David Bowers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:

Re: Url Validation Configuration Options

n I was waiting to see if it got accepted before submitting any changes to struts. Niall - Original Message - From: "Robert Leland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 3:38 AM Subject: Re: Url

Re: Url Validation Configuration Options

I've submitted a new patch with your suggestion. Niall - Original Message - From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 4:33 AM Subject: Re: Url Validation Configuration O

Re: Url Validation Configuration Options

--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any thoughts on this one? The patch looks reasonable to me although the conversion from List to String[] could be made simpler: String[] schemes = new String[schemeList.size()]; schemeList.toArray(schemes); instead of: String[] schemes = null; ... sc

Re: Url Validation Configuration Options

Ted Husted wrote: Any thoughts on this one? http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28148 "The current url validation in struts (validateUrl method in FieldChecks) only uses the default url configuration options. "I am attaching a patch that will allow the following options to be set

Re: URL validation

-Rob -Original Message- From: Richard Bywater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2004 10:06 PM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: Re: URL validation If we're talking URLs aren't we looking at the wrong RFC? RFC1738 has this section: 3.3. HTTP Th

Re: URL validation

ter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2004 10:06 PM > To: 'Struts Developers List' > Subject: Re: URL validation > > If we're talking URLs aren't we looking at the wrong RFC? RFC1738 has > this section: > > 3.3. HTTP > >

Re: URL validation

If we're talking URLs aren't we looking at the wrong RFC? RFC1738 has this section: 3.3. HTTP The HTTP URL scheme is used to designate Internet resources accessible using HTTP (HyperText Transfer Protocol). The HTTP protocol is specified elsewhere. This specification only describes the

Re: URL validation

IL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -Original Message- From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: URL validation On 03/15/2004 10:16 AM Adam Hardy wrote: On 03/13/2004 07:46 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Adam Hardy I provide URL validation on a page which

Re: URL validation

lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -Original Message----- > > From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: URL validation > > > > On 03/15/2004 10:16 AM Adam Hardy wrote: > > > On 03/13/2004 07:46 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot

Re: URL validation

--- "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2004 03:41 PM > > To: 'Struts Developers List' > > Subject: Re: URL v

Re: URL validation

> The way I read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2396.html > section 3.3 > > I don't believe the path segment can legally end with a '/'. > Read the RFC and see what you think. > > So I don't believe http://www.google.com:80/?action=xyz > strictly speaking is valid, should we optionally allow for it >

Re: URL validation

> -Original Message- > From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2004 03:41 PM > To: 'Struts Developers List' > Subject: Re: URL validation > > On 03/15/2004 10:16 AM Adam Hardy wrote: > > On 03/13/2004 07:46 AM [EMAIL PR

Re: URL validation

On 03/15/2004 10:16 AM Adam Hardy wrote: On 03/13/2004 07:46 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Adam Hardy I provide URL validation on a page which saves links for users. I put together the latest build of commons-validator (1.1.2) and struts (1.2) to see what the URL validation is like. The clas