2010/8/24 Martin Cooper :
> If there's a good reason for not having the code in the main trunk,
> even when it's not part of the distribution, then I suppose it could
> be moved back to the sandbox, or even to the archive.
Basically not, it can stay where it is right now. There is a minor
problem
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Dave Newton wrote:
> Should the Dojo plugin be removed from the distro now?
>
> WW-3484 was just entered against it--if it's not going to be supported, I
> guess I'd vote for stripping it out and putting the code elsewhere like on
> Google or something.
Removing i
I would think so, but that's just me.
(I would like to see it live on Google Code, though, so if anybody *wants*
to support it, they could.)
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Dale Newfield wrote:
> On 8/21/10 11:51 AM, Dave Newton wrote:
>
>> Should the Dojo plugin be removed from the distro no
On 8/21/10 11:51 AM, Dave Newton wrote:
Should the Dojo plugin be removed from the distro now?
Wasn't it deprecated in 2.1? Doesn't that mean we can just kill it in 2.2?
-Dale
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts
truts Developers List
Cc: Gustave Pheiffers
Subject: Re: Dojo plugin deprecated
Let's be clear about this.
* Lots of people think that the Dojo-based AJAX tags would be useful if they
worked with the latest versions of Dojo, or some other toolkit.
* Few, if any, people want to use them in the
Rene Gielen wrote:
Hmm, that is not what I am experiencing - I know a lot of people using the
dojo tags for exactly what it is capable right now, basically doing some
asynchronous page updates and form validation.
I said this once a long time ago; I'll throw it out again now.
I think a core (
In fact the tags are a lot better in 2.1 than they were in 2.0. The
problem is that for a long time we (as in struts 2 committers) have
stopped trying to catch up with Dojo versions and updating the tags
accordingly. This deprecation is the official announcement of my
previous sentence. If they nev
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
I don't know, I think Andreas' point has at least some validity... the
page he linked to does in fact state:
"*First-class AJAX support* - Add interactivity and flexibility with
AJAX tags that look and feel just like standard Struts tags."
Seems like if that's no lon
Guys,
Am Do, 15.01.2009, 07:36, schrieb Martin Cooper:
> Let's be clear about this.
>
> * Lots of people think that the Dojo-based AJAX tags would be useful if
> they
> worked with the latest versions of Dojo, or some other toolkit.
> * Few, if any, people want to use them in their current form.
+1 for removing the First-Class AJAX support line.
Al.
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
I don't know, I think Andreas' point has at least some validity... the
page he linked to does in fact state:
"*First-class AJAX support* - Add interactivity and flexibility with
AJAX tags that look and feel just
I don't know, I think Andreas' point has at least some validity... the
page he linked to does in fact state:
"*First-class AJAX support* - Add interactivity and flexibility with
AJAX tags that look and feel just like standard Struts tags."
Seems like if that's no longer the case, to whatever
The other thing to remember is that S2 doesn't stop you taking any of
the existing AJAX frameworks and using them directly in your JSPs, so
it's no like the change has completely barred the use of AJAX functionality.
Al.
Martin Cooper wrote:
Let's be clear about this.
* Lots of people think
Let's be clear about this.
* Lots of people think that the Dojo-based AJAX tags would be useful if they
worked with the latest versions of Dojo, or some other toolkit.
* Few, if any, people want to use them in their current form.
* Nobody has stepped up and offered to migrate these tags to anythin
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 23:42:18 Gustave Pheiffers wrote:
> Thanks for the info.
>
> It would be a shame if the to use especially the " But I suppose its alot of work to upgrade/maintain the DOJO plugin.
I think there should be a warning-sign about this on the web
(http://struts.apache.or
Thanks for the info.
It would be a shame if the mailto:musa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 15 January 2009 11:05 a.m.
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Dojo plugin deprecated
It means they will eventually be removed or not updated, unless
someone comes up with the code to upgrade them to
It means they will eventually be removed or not updated, unless
someone comes up with the code to upgrade them to a newer version of
Dojo, or a different framework (no volunteers so far).
musachy
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Gustave Pheiffers
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> My understanding is the Do
A few people have tried, but this was some time ago. I can't remember
the problems right now, other than it was non-trivial.
I agree with Martin that we shouldn't just dump the code expecting that
someone else looks after it. Although, other than Musachy, I'm not
aware of any of the committers wo
--- On Sat, 12/20/08, Matt Raible wrote:
> Do we have a plugins area we can check it into? I'd be interested
> in helping update this project to the latest version of Dojo.
It's already in the "plugins" directory. The (potential) issue with leaving it
there is the implied support. Maybe we coul
Do we have a plugins area we can check it into? I'd be interested in
helping update this project to the latest version of Dojo.
Matt
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:27 AM, James Holmes wrote:
>
>> +1 and agree with Dave on moving the Dojo stuff
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:27 AM, James Holmes wrote:
> +1 and agree with Dave on moving the Dojo stuff into a plugin that is
> hosted
> somewhere else and can be maintained by more people.
I'm fine with deprecating it, but I'm not in favour of just dumping it at
Google Code in the hope that som
+1
Den 20. des.. 2008 kl. 19.27 skrev "James Holmes"
:
+1 and agree with Dave on moving the Dojo stuff into a plugin that
is hosted
somewhere else and can be maintained by more people.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Dave Newton
wrote:
--- On Sat, 12/20/08, Musachy Barroso wrote:
+1 and agree with Dave on moving the Dojo stuff into a plugin that is hosted
somewhere else and can be maintained by more people.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Dave Newton wrote:
> --- On Sat, 12/20/08, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > We have talked about this Ad nauseam, and it is obvious that
>
--- On Sat, 12/20/08, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> We have talked about this Ad nauseam, and it is obvious that
> we don't have anyone willing to fix all the current bugs,
> upgrade the Dojo plugin, or write a replacement. 2.1 is
> around the corner and I think we should let users know
> that the D
gt; there are a few people who use screen readers and that puts me personally on
> spot for using framework's ajax tags.
>
> - Original Message
> From: Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Struts Developers List
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 1:19:47 PM
>
Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 1:19:47 PM
Subject: Re: dojo plugin
My take on it is that a limited amount of functionality is valuable--make the
simplest use-cases extremely simple. Anything beyond that it's better to just
u
PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: dojo plugin
> To: "Struts Developers List"
> Date: Thursday, July 10, 2008, 1:11 PM
> Well, I have started 3 times so far, and quit each time. In
> my very
> own humble opinion I don't think it is worth all the
> effort. Our
> j
Well, I have started 3 times so far, and quit each time. In my very
own humble opinion I don't think it is worth all the effort. Our
javascript code consists of wrappers around the dojo widgets to either
fix bugs, or add functionality (like topics). Feel free to ask
questions about the current impl
s of supporting, matured code with a smaller footprint in
a short period of time.
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 fra
--- Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My main driver for doing the updates was to update the S2.1 code to bring
> it inline with the latest version, but perhaps we should put our hands up
and
> admit that S2's focus is not on Ajax UI widgets
Nobody has yet provided any information as to the
Martin Cooper wrote:
On the other hand, creating the project in the Struts sandbox means that it
is immediately open to any Struts committer, all of the resources are
already set up, and getting a release out is dependent only upon a vote to
move the code from the sandbox to the main code li
ED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 3:16 AM
Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Jeromy Evans <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Agreed. The Dojo 0.43 plugin in Struts2.1.1 contains significant
improv
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeromy Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 5:56 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
>
>
> I've concluded that tag libraries for rich client fram
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Jeromy Evans <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. The Dojo 0.43 plugin in Struts2.1.1 contains significant
> improvements over the Dojo 0.40 tags bundled in 2.0.x. It's worth releasing
> as-is and I'd give it a +1 today.
>
> It sounds like there's enough people i
Dave Newton wrote:
Nutshell: what's anybody's take on the effort this would require, and who's
available to make that effort?
I share similar sentiment and at most will just be able to convert my
existing 2.1.1 test applications over to use the Dojo 1.x plugin to
investigate the conseque
Agreed. The Dojo 0.43 plugin in Struts2.1.1 contains significant
improvements over the Dojo 0.40 tags bundled in 2.0.x. It's worth
releasing as-is and I'd give it a +1 today.
It sounds like there's enough people interested to complete a Dojo 1.x
plugin. I also think it's worth creating a go
I don't think we should wait at all. Refactoring dojo out of core was
one of the main things for 2.1 and it's been there for a year already.
Unless Dojo 1.0 is a lot, way, way better than the older versions, I
would say you will find lots of surprises. IMO you should set it up as
a project on googl
--- Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whilst I can see that there is an advantage to getting a 2.1 release out,
> my question would be do we want it to go out with a (very) old version
> of dojo as the demonstration of it's modern ajax capabilities?, and do
> we want to put developers throug
to 0.4 as the bundled version and then
jump to a much newer version as a minor version release?
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Rainer Hermanns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 4:22 PM
Subject: RE: Dojo plugi
struts after you've
done the replacement.
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 4:09 PM
Subject: RE: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
-Original Message-
n continue with the development of S2.1.x.
What do you think?
cheers,
Rainer
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Al Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 12:44 AM
>> To: Struts Developers List
>> Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1
> -Original Message-
> From: Al Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 12:44 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
>
> All of the bits are left in place so that the source can be
> re
bugs,
but at least we now starting the move :).
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Musachy Barroso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 3:18 AM
Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
How deep ar
ress.
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Pedro Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 1:47 AM
Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
This point is clear to me,but ,why don´t you leave a only the jar available
instead the all structur
re bugs will be
discovered as people thrash it.
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 1:03 AM
Subject: RE: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
How deep are the clie
You can do, I'm keeping it on my system atm, so I'm happy to co-ordinate
changes.
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 11:32 PM
Subject: RE: Dojo plugin
> How deep are the client-side tests for the Dojo components? My impression was
> that a fair amount had changed moving from Dojo 0.4mumble -> 1.0.
>
Pretty much the whole thing changed, as far as I know.
musachy
-
To unsubscri
t people to confuse it with the official S2.1 dojo plugin.
>
> Al.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Pedro Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 2:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framew
How deep are the client-side tests for the Dojo components? My impression was
that a fair amount had changed moving from Dojo 0.4mumble -> 1.0.
I don't know the nature of all the changes that were made, but it makes me
nervous. Musachy might have a better handle on this.
Dave
--- "Karr, David" <
Is it appropriate at this point to submit a bug for this, and provide a
patch for your changes?
> -Original Message-
> From: Al Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 11:18 PM
> To: dev@struts.apache.org
> Subject: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
>
>
It's a download URL for a zip file, not a maven repository.
I don't want people to confuse it with the official S2.1 dojo plugin.
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Pedro Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: Dojo
is the source correct (http://www.alsutton.com/dojo_1_1_0_for_2_1_1.zip);
I cant execute mvn package command.
-
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.FileNotFoundException:
C:\Temp\struts_dojo1.1\dojo\..\..\core\src\site\resources\tags\ajax\a.html
Herrera
Al Sutton wrote:
>
Thanks Al - We(& Others I know) are waiting for it quite a long time
since we believe that Struts 2 with Dojo 1.X
are very good choice from architecture prespective.
1 note -
We started working with Dojo 1.0 for few months with Struts 2 - (We had
minimal conversion of some of the tags we used)
Fr
good job. I´ve started a new project and I´m going to test your plugin for
now. I were waiting for this improve for a long time.
Thanks
Herrera
Al Sutton wrote:
>
> [I'm posing this via nabble because the apache mail servers are saying my
> last 3 attempts to send this via my normal mailbox
id is required if "parseContent" is set to false on head. we will have
to add that to the tags docs (there is a section that is shared by all
of them, it should go there)
regards
musachy
On Feb 10, 2008 10:16 PM, Wes Wannemacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been perusing JIRA looking for thi
54 matches
Mail list logo
