At 5:25 PM -0500 2/27/05, James Mitchell wrote:
I think the best solution to this now would be to put the mock
classes back under core test and simply build them as a separate jar
(so taglib and tiles can use them).
Do you agree?
If mock were simply included in struts-core.jar, then taglib and
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: struts build change questions
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:32:31 -0500, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Ok,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:37:40 -0600, Joe Germuska wrote:
> At 12:32 PM -0500 2/27/05, James Mitchell wrote:
>> Ok, now this is interesting. "mock" depends on "core", and "core
>> tests" depend on "mock". Maven wants to build/test for each
>> distribution, so the "first time" developer is in a chic
; James Mitchell
> Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
> EdgeTech, Inc.
> 678.910.8017
> AIM: jmitchtx
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Developers List"
> Sent: Sunday, Febr
At 12:32 PM -0500 2/27/05, James Mitchell wrote:
Ok, now this is interesting. "mock" depends on "core", and "core
tests" depend on "mock". Maven wants to build/test for each
distribution, so the "first time" developer is in a chicken-and-egg
state trying to "maven build-all" or even "maven dis
chtx
- Original Message -
From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 12:34 AM
Subject: Re: struts build change questions
done
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2005 1:16 AM
Subject: Re: struts build change questions
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 00:18:25 -0500, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I agree on all points.
So, you think I should yank it up to struts/current/ ?
+1
Craig
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Op
> 678.910.8017
> AIM: jmitchtx
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Developers List"
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 11:56 PM
> Subject: Re: struts build change questions
>
&
evelopers List"
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: struts build change questions
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 23:40:41 -0500, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It seems to me that a framework which ships (and supports) a
> ready-made set of mock classes will hav
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 23:40:41 -0500, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > It seems to me that a framework which ships (and supports) a
> > ready-made set of mock classes will have an advantage in today's
> > world.
>
> Yes. It's interesting how things work out. Over the years I use
It seems to me that a framework which ships (and supports) a
ready-made set of mock classes will have an advantage in today's
world.
Yes. It's interesting how things work out. Over the years I used to swear
by in-container based test suites, but after fighting with Cactus and
fiddling with a f
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:50:11 -0500, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Joe Germuska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 3:01 PM
> Subject: struts build change questions
>
> > Hey:
> >
> > I just went to do a couple of thin
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Germuska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 3:01 PM
Subject: struts build change questions
Hey:
I just went to do a couple of things with Struts SVN, and I wanted to
check a couple of things James has done:
If struts-mock is going
13 matches
Mail list logo
