Re: STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0

2025-03-03 Thread Greg Huber
OK thanks, https://struts.apache.org/ links at the top seem broken?  Could not find the releases page? btw for STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0 in the pom should it be java 17?   UTF-8 17 17     6.3.0.2     2.23.1 9.4.46.v20220331 true     2.14.1 2.14.1     On 03/03/2025 09:46, Lukasz

Re: STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0

2025-03-03 Thread Ing. Andrea Vettori
ill loaded in memory, thus causing a >>>>>>> memory >>>>>>> leak (use a profiler to confirm): >>>>>>> /helloworld >>>>>>> /helloworld >>>>>>> /helloworld >>>>>>> >>&g

Re: STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0

2025-03-03 Thread Lukasz Lenart
ems to me that you’ve compiled struts example war with one jdk > >>>>>> and are running tomcat with a different one? > >>>>>> I did everything with the same jdk version, to be precise it is > >>>>>> > >>>>>>

Re: STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0

2025-03-03 Thread Lukasz Lenart
pt., 28 lut 2025 o 12:28 Greg Huber napisał(a): > > | https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/tree/STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0 > > Thanks, missed it, and its not oblivious using the branch name. Maybe a > note somewhere on the landing page? I created a Github Release out of the tag a

Re: STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0

2025-02-28 Thread Ing. Andrea vettori
ttori wrote: >>>>>> It seems to me that you’ve compiled struts example war with one jdk and >>>>>> are running tomcat with a different one? >>>>>> I did everything with the same jdk version, to be precise it is >>>>>> >>>>

Re: STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0

2025-02-28 Thread Greg Huber
ote: I tried to use STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0 and I get two ApplicationContext in memory on jdk17 and tomcat 9.0.100 when doing a redeploy either using manager reload or simply coping the war file. Using tomcat manager I get the following message using the ‘Find Leaks’ button: The following web applications we

Re: STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0

2025-02-28 Thread Ing. Andrea Vettori
t;>>> sharing) >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 28 Feb 2025, at 15:28, Greg Huber wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Well it only likes jkd17? Should this be jdk8 as its v6? >>>>> >>>>> java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: >>>

Re: STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0

2025-02-28 Thread Greg Huber
Java Runtime (class file version 61.0), this version of the Java Runtime only recognizes class file versions up to 52.0 (unable to load class [org.apache.struts.helloworld.action.HelloWorldAction]) On 28/02/2025 13:14, Ing. Andrea Vettori wrote: I tried to use STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0 and I get two A

Re: STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0

2025-02-28 Thread Ing. Andrea Vettori
t;>> >>> java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: >>> org/apache/struts/helloworld/action/HelloWorldAction has been compiled by a >>> more recent version of the Java Runtime (class file version 61.0), this >>> version of the Java Runtime only recognizes cla

Re: STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0

2025-02-28 Thread Greg Huber
ore recent version of the Java Runtime (class file version 61.0), this version of the Java Runtime only recognizes class file versions up to 52.0 (unable to load class [org.apache.struts.helloworld.action.HelloWorldAction]) On 28/02/2025 13:14, Ing. Andrea Vettori wrote: I tried to use STRUTS_EXAMPLES

Re: STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0

2025-02-28 Thread Ing. Andrea Vettori
3:14, Ing. Andrea Vettori wrote: >> I tried to use STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0 and I get two ApplicationContext in >> memory on jdk17 and tomcat 9.0.100 when doing a redeploy either using >> manager reload or simply coping the war file. >> >> Using tomcat manager I get the

STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0

2025-02-28 Thread Greg Huber
class file versions up to 52.0 (unable to load class [org.apache.struts.helloworld.action.HelloWorldAction]) On 28/02/2025 13:14, Ing. Andrea Vettori wrote: I tried to use STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0 and I get two ApplicationContext in memory on jdk17 and tomcat 9.0.100 when doing a redeploy either

STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0

2025-02-28 Thread Greg Huber
| https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/tree/STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0 Thanks, missed it, and its not oblivious using the branch name. Maybe a note somewhere on the landing page? On 28/02/2025 11:04, Lukasz Lenart wrote: pt., 28 lut 2025 o 11:55 Greg Huber napisał(a): Maybe comparing your