Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-22 Thread Lukasz Lenart
; > Thanks, > Dario. > > -Original Message- > From: Greg Huber [mailto:gregh3...@gmail.com] > Sent: 22 June 2016 10:44 > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29 > > for > > value="%{#list.id.eventCategory}" /&g

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-22 Thread Greg Huber
ce there is no value attribute provided to the tag in either case, the > tag just evaluates the name expression for you to retrieve the value. > > Thanks, > Dario. > > -Original Message- > From: Greg Huber [mailto:gregh3...@gmail.com] > Sent: 22 June 2016 10:44 > T

RE: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-22 Thread dario.liberman
to the tag in either case, the tag just evaluates the name expression for you to retrieve the value. Thanks, Dario. -Original Message- From: Greg Huber [mailto:gregh3...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 June 2016 10:44 To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29 for

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-22 Thread Greg Huber
gards, > Dario. > > -Original Message- > From: Lukasz Lenart [mailto:lukaszlen...@apache.org] > Sent: 22 June 2016 10:15 > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29 > > 2016-06-22 11:10 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > > not really su

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-22 Thread Greg Huber
io. > > -Original Message- > From: Lukasz Lenart [mailto:lukaszlen...@apache.org] > Sent: 22 June 2016 10:15 > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29 > > 2016-06-22 11:10 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > > not really sure on your examp

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-22 Thread Greg Huber
to be able to "fix" all > of them with such a work-around in a reasonable time-frame. > > Regards, > Dario. > > -Original Message- > From: Lukasz Lenart [mailto:lukaszlen...@apache.org] > Sent: 22 June 2016 10:15 > To: Struts Developers List > Subjec

RE: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-22 Thread dario.liberman
attribute to be able to "fix" all of them with such a work-around in a reasonable time-frame. Regards, Dario. -Original Message- From: Lukasz Lenart [mailto:lukaszlen...@apache.org] Sent: 22 June 2016 10:15 To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29 2016-0

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-22 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2016-06-22 11:10 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > not really sure on your example, but this works, is this the same? > > > > . > value="%{#list.description}" maxlength="60" size="60" /> > . > WoW! I'm impressed :) Greg can you post your answer here as well https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-22 Thread Greg Huber
not really sure on your example, but this works, is this the same? . . On 22 June 2016 at 10:00, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2016-06-22 10:56 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > > If the style %{#entry.entryId} did not work it would completely break my > > system? Which is working OK. > > It's a c

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-22 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2016-06-22 10:56 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > If the style %{#entry.entryId} did not work it would completely break my > system? Which is working OK. It's a case when you have a list and dynamically fetching elements from this list, i.e.: // given String[] list = new String[]{"foo", "bar}; int index

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-22 Thread Greg Huber
If the style %{#entry.entryId} did not work it would completely break my system? Which is working OK. On 22 June 2016 at 09:47, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2016-06-22 10:37 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > > As there are web.xml, struts.xml and dtd changes for v2.5, testing prior > > releases is problemat

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-22 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2016-06-22 10:37 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > As there are web.xml, struts.xml and dtd changes for v2.5, testing prior > releases is problematic, so best to switch to the latest versions if > upgrading. Also latest versions will get more much testing. The problem is that the mentioned issue affects 2

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-22 Thread Greg Huber
; > Should 2.3.29 be recalled based on the regressions found for all Struts > tag name attribute expressions? > > See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4641 > > > > Regards, > > > > Dario dot Liberman at JavelinGroup dot com > > > > On 2016-06-1

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-22 Thread Lukasz Lenart
the regressions found for all Struts tag > name attribute expressions? > See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4641 > > Regards, > > Dario dot Liberman at JavelinGroup dot com > > On 2016-06-14 08:07 (+0100), Lukasz Lenart wrote: >> The Struts 2.3.29 test b

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-21 Thread dario.liber...@javelingroup.com
-1 Hi, Should 2.3.29 be recalled based on the regressions found for all Struts tag name attribute expressions? See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4641 Regards, Dario dot Liberman at JavelinGroup dot com On 2016-06-14 08:07 (+0100), Lukasz Lenart wrote: > The Struts 2.3.29 t

[CLOSED] Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-16 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Vote passed with result +1 (binding) x3 Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ 2016-06-14 9:07 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart : > The Struts 2.3.29 test build is now available. It includes the latest > security patch which fixes few possible vulnerabilities: > - Ac

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-16 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2016-06-16 13:52 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [x] General Availability (GA) > > +1 (b) ;) Thanks! -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-16 Thread Greg Huber
[ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [x] General Availability (GA) +1 (b) ;) On 16 June 2016 at 12:39, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > One more vote is needed :) > > 2016-06-14 9:07 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart : > > The Struts 2.3.29 test build is now available. It includes the late

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-16 Thread Lukasz Lenart
One more vote is needed :) 2016-06-14 9:07 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart : > The Struts 2.3.29 test build is now available. It includes the latest > security patch which fixes few possible vulnerabilities: > - Action name clean up is error prone > - Forced double OGNL evaluation, when eval

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-15 Thread Johannes Geppert
> [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] General Availability (GA) +1 binding Johannes Geppert # web: http://www.jgeppert.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep 2016-06-14 21:34 GMT-07:00 Lukasz Lenart : > 2016-06-14 9:07 GMT+02:00

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-14 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2016-06-14 9:07 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart : > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] General Availability (GA) +1 binding Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-u

[VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.29

2016-06-14 Thread Lukasz Lenart
The Struts 2.3.29 test build is now available. It includes the latest security patch which fixes few possible vulnerabilities: - Action name clean up is error prone - Forced double OGNL evaluation, when evaluated on raw user input in tag attributes, may lead to remote code execution (similar to

Struts 2.3.29

2016-05-12 Thread Lukasz Lenart
I'm going to start working on preparing another 2.3.x version, there are 13 issues to fix but I'm not sure if all can be addressed in this version. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW/fixforversion/12335463/ Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/