Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA3

2016-01-22 18:26 GMT+01:00 Greg Huber : > Best I can come up with is > com.opensymphony.xwork2.config.implActionConfigMatcher creates a new > ActionConfig but then only uses the default allowed names: > > return new ActionConfig.Builder(pkgName, orig.getName(), className) >

Re: [CLOSED][VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA3

Vote passed with result: [X] Beta - 3x +1 (binding) Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ 2016-01-21 14:56 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: > The Apache Struts 2.5 BETA3 test build is now available. > > New in BETA1 > - XWork

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA3

OK WW-4596. I did try to find out where the orig object comes from to create pull request, but I was unable to fathom it out. Needs better documentation in the source. So I guess a finial solution would be better form someone who understands what is going on. Cheers Greg. On 25 January 2016 at

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA3

Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: > The Apache Struts 2.5 BETA3 test build is now available. > > New in BETA1 > - XWork source was merged into Struts Core source, it means that there > be no more xwork artifact nor dedicated jar > - OGNL was upgraded to version 3.0

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA3

[ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [X] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) I'm fine to release it as Beta: +1 binding Regards, Christoph > The Apache Struts 2.5 BETA3 test build is now available. > > New in BETA1 > - XWork source was merged into Struts Core sour

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA3

[ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [x] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) Great job! Am 21.01.16 um 14:56 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > The Apache Struts 2.5 BETA3 test build is now available. > > New in BETA1 > - XWork source was merged into Struts Core source, it means that there

Fwd: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA3

[VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA3 To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org> I have got it to start now (missed a dtd, so sorry!) I now have this: execute,input,cancel and get This method: cancel for action eventAdd is not allowed! - [unknown location] .EventAdd

Struts 2.5 BETA3

I am looking forward to testing Beta 3. I tested Beta 2 and am suddenly having problems with the value stack being pre-populated with the prior responses value stack associated with a session. It may be a configuration or an issue I had updating my web.xml for the new struts. I really like the

[VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA3

The Apache Struts 2.5 BETA3 test build is now available. New in BETA1 - XWork source was merged into Struts Core source, it means that there be no more xwork artifact nor dedicated jar - OGNL was upgraded to version 3.0.11 and it breaks access to properties as it follows Java Bean Specification

Re: Struts 2.5 BETA3

Working on BETA3 2016-01-19 16:02 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart : > I see no objections, starting with BETA3 > > 2016-01-18 15:58 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart : >> If no objections I am going prepare BETA3 release >> >> 2016-01-11 14:53 GMT+01:00 Christoph

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA3

saying that it must be declared, with the correct line number in the struts.xml file. Well it is. Where should it go? btw I need all methods to pass until I can work out what I need. Cheers Greg On 21 January 2016 at 13:56, Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org> wrote: > The Apache Strut

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA3

2016-01-21 16:32 GMT+01:00 Greg Huber : > I cannot seem to get the dmi to work, I get action not allowed: > > *This method: save for action eventAdd is not allowed! - [unknown location]* > > I then get this error when I add global-allowed-methods : > > > .. > >

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA3

> btw I need all methods to pass until I can work out what I need. > > Cheers Greg > > > On 21 January 2016 at 13:56, Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> The Apache Struts 2.5 BETA3 test build is now available. >> >> New in BETA1

Re: Struts 2.5 BETA3

I see no objections, starting with BETA3 2016-01-18 15:58 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart : > If no objections I am going prepare BETA3 release > > 2016-01-11 14:53 GMT+01:00 Christoph Nenning : >>> @Christoph I was able to resolve the issue with

Re: Struts 2.5 BETA3

If no objections I am going prepare BETA3 release 2016-01-11 14:53 GMT+01:00 Christoph Nenning : >> @Christoph I was able to resolve the issue with that warning about >> Custom EL ... also fixed the problem with loading ftl layouts - you >> must define a proper

Re: Struts 2.5 BETA3

> @Christoph I was able to resolve the issue with that warning about > Custom EL ... also fixed the problem with loading ftl layouts - you > must define a proper templateType -> > https://github.com/lukaszlenart/struts2-tiles-demo/commit/ > dc52bc82895dc664ff0db0bb8ca330a13e48c169 > - I will add

Re: Struts 2.5 BETA3

@Christoph I was able to resolve the issue with that warning about Custom EL ... also fixed the problem with loading ftl layouts - you must define a proper templateType -> https://github.com/lukaszlenart/struts2-tiles-demo/commit/dc52bc82895dc664ff0db0bb8ca330a13e48c169 - I will add this to docs

Re: Struts 2.5 BETA3

Wait! My Tiles PR targets 2.3.25 not 2.5 :) I was planning do the same for 2.5 - drop support for Tiles 2 and use Tiles 3 only 2016-01-05 20:01 GMT+01:00 Aleksandr Mashchenko : > +1 for merging tiles PR > > Regards, > Aleksandr > > >

Re: Struts 2.5 BETA3

> Wait! My Tiles PR targets 2.3.25 not 2.5 :) I was planning do the same > for 2.5 - drop support for Tiles 2 and use Tiles 3 only > Oh yes, I remembered. So it is more work to get done for 2.5. Do you want to do BETA3 before? I'm fine with that. Regards, Christoph This Email was scanned by

Re: Struts 2.5 BETA3

2016-01-07 13:43 GMT+01:00 Christoph Nenning : >> Wait! My Tiles PR targets 2.3.25 not 2.5 :) I was planning do the same >> for 2.5 - drop support for Tiles 2 and use Tiles 3 only >> > > Oh yes, I remembered. So it is more work to get done for 2.5. > > Do you want to

Re: Struts 2.5 BETA3

> >> Wait! My Tiles PR targets 2.3.25 not 2.5 :) I was planning do the same > >> for 2.5 - drop support for Tiles 2 and use Tiles 3 only > >> > > > > Oh yes, I remembered. So it is more work to get done for 2.5. > > > > Do you want to do BETA3 before? > > I'm fine with that. > > I thought about

Re: Struts 2.5 BETA3

Beta 2 did not work for me due to the dmi changes, was this ever resolved? Cheers Greg. from a previous email: On 30 September 2015 at 09:46, Lukasz Lenart wrote: 2015-09-30 10:43 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > Here is my abbreviated structure: > > >

Re: Struts 2.5 BETA3

2016-01-05 9:37 GMT+01:00 Greg Huber : > Beta 2 did not work for me due to the dmi changes, was this ever resolved? > > > Cheers Greg. > > from a previous email: > > > On 30 September 2015 at 09:46, Lukasz Lenart > wrote: > 2015-09-30 10:43 GMT+02:00

Re: Struts 2.5 BETA3

2016-01-05 13:59 GMT+01:00 Christoph Nenning : > I would merge the tiles PR before BETA3. But basically: +1 Yeah, it would be nice Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ -

Re: Struts 2.5 BETA3

+1 for merging tiles PR Regards, Aleksandr - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org

Re: Struts 2.5 BETA3

> Hi, > > I think it's time to release the BETA3 and start thinking about a > normal release. We have over 30 issues resolved from the BETA2. > > I would merge the tiles PR before BETA3. But basically: +1 Regards, Christoph This Email was scanned by Sophos Anti Virus