Re: struts-master pom release

2009-04-27 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2009/4/27 Wes Wannemacher : > PS - HAHAHAHA! Just before I hit send, the NOTICE email came through... So, as I understood you don't need my id, but just for case: username: lukaszlenart e-mail: lukaszlen...@apache.org Regards -- Lukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/

Re: struts-master pom release

2009-04-26 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote: > On Sunday 26 April 2009 07:47:25 pm Martin Cooper wrote: > > > > There's no requirement to serialise votes and releases the way you > describe > > above. In fact, as Wendy pointed out before, we could actually run the > > votes concurrentl

Re: struts-master pom release

2009-04-26 Thread Wes Wannemacher
On Sunday 26 April 2009 07:47:25 pm Martin Cooper wrote: > > There's no requirement to serialise votes and releases the way you describe > above. In fact, as Wendy pointed out before, we could actually run the > votes concurrently. I'd say there's very little chance that the POM vote > would fail,

Re: struts-master pom release

2009-04-26 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote: > On Sunday 26 April 2009 07:14:30 pm Martin Cooper wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Wes Wannemacher > wrote: > > > Which brings me back to my first question. Knowing that lukasz will be > > > added any day now, should we hold of

Re: struts-master pom release

2009-04-26 Thread Wes Wannemacher
On Sunday 26 April 2009 07:14:30 pm Martin Cooper wrote: > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote: > > Which brings me back to my first question. Knowing that lukasz will be > > added any day now, should we hold off a few days? Otherwise we will > > all have to spin some cycles aga

Re: struts-master pom release

2009-04-26 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote: > Which brings me back to my first question. Knowing that lukasz will be > added any day now, should we hold off a few days? Otherwise we will > all have to spin some cycles again on this for the next release. Is your concern that you want

Re: struts-master pom release

2009-04-26 Thread Wes Wannemacher
On Sunday 26 April 2009 06:56:17 pm Musachy Barroso wrote: > I'd say just wait, it will happen in the next couple of days. > Yep, that's fine. Martin, do you want to release it when you do the official adding of our newest committer? Or should I just watch for it? -Wes -- Wes Wannemacher Aut

Re: struts-master pom release

2009-04-26 Thread Musachy Barroso
I'd say just wait, it will happen in the next couple of days. musachy On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote: > Which brings me back to my first question. Knowing that lukasz will be > added any day now, should we hold off a few days? Otherwise we will > all have to spin some cyc

Re: struts-master pom release

2009-04-26 Thread Wes Wannemacher
Which brings me back to my first question. Knowing that lukasz will be added any day now, should we hold off a few days? Otherwise we will all have to spin some cycles again on this for the next release. -Wes On 4/26/09, Martin Cooper wrote: > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Musachy Barroso wr

Re: struts-master pom release

2009-04-26 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > Yeah Martin is right, see > > http://struts.markmail.org/search/?q=[VOTE]+master#query:[VOTE]%20master+page:1+mid:zuirstynwqyut3jx+state:results

Re: struts-master pom release

2009-04-26 Thread Musachy Barroso
Yeah Martin is right, see http://struts.markmail.org/search/?q=[VOTE]+master#query:[VOTE]%20master+page:1+mid:zuirstynwqyut3jx+state:results I guess it would be a good idea to add it to the documentation. I wonder how people test the master pom before voting. musachy On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 4:59

Re: struts-master pom release

2009-04-26 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > 1) It has been discussed before, I don't think we vote on poms/maven > artifacts Yes, this has been discussed before. It does need a vote. Every release needs to be voted on by the PMC. See the thread on releasing Annotations 1.0.4 for

Re: struts-master pom release

2009-04-26 Thread Wes Wannemacher
On Sunday 26 April 2009 03:12:24 pm Musachy Barroso wrote: > 1) It has been discussed before, I don't think we vote on poms/maven > artifacts 2) do you mean the maven archetypes? If so, I think we should > wait if Lukasz can take care of them, we have been pushing them around for > a while > No, f

Re: struts-master pom release

2009-04-26 Thread Musachy Barroso
1) It has been discussed before, I don't think we vote on poms/maven artifacts 2) do you mean the maven archetypes? If so, I think we should wait if Lukasz can take care of them, we have been pushing them around for a while musachy On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote: > Lookin

struts-master pom release

2009-04-26 Thread Wes Wannemacher
Looking through the list of tasks, it looks like we need to release struts- master... This brings up a few questions, 1) Do we do a vote, etc. to get this released... 2)Should we wait for upcoming changes to complete to avoid doing another release in a week or two? Knowing another committer is

Struts Master pom release

2006-12-07 Thread Niall Pemberton
I'd like to release the struts master pom - struts1 is currently depending on 4-SNAPSHOT which is a blocker to any possible release. Niall - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE